Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Industrial Sabotage: Rockefeller Fund’s $28 Million Campaign Against Keystone Pipeline
http://www.verumserum.com/ ^ | February 6, 2012 | John MERLINE

Posted on 02/07/2012 9:00:31 AM PST by Para-Ord.45

The keystone pipeline is actually just one of several oil sands pipelines targeted by the Rockefeller Brother’s Fund in a coordinated, 4-year, $28 million dollar campaign. Ezra Levant calls it industrial sabotage and, based on their own Power Point, that certainly seems an apt description:

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/video/fine-with-foreign-funds/1426148700001

For all their bluster about money in politics, you won’t hear anything about this from congressional Democrats or their allies on MSNBC. How about it Rachel Maddow? Will you do a segment on keeping the Rockefeller Fund out of American and Canadian energy policy? As it happens, Ezra Levant made this exact point in part 2:

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/video/billionaire-boondoggle/1428210002001


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: keystonepipeline; rockefellerbrothers; rockefellerfund; rockefellers; sourcetitlenoturl
Amazing.

Industrial sabotage or economic terrorism and NOTHING , not a peep, from the left-wing dominant media who did btw go apes**t with false claims the NRA was funding pro-freedom firearms groups in Canada.

My question is, why aren`t people being arrested for industrial sabotage/economic terrorism?

1 posted on 02/07/2012 9:00:36 AM PST by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

Democrats - Thieves, Thugs, Thralls and Thickheads


2 posted on 02/07/2012 9:02:26 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

PS: Author is only listed as John and not the autofil of John Merline.

Most likely is John Sexton


3 posted on 02/07/2012 9:03:35 AM PST by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

This is a campaign to destroy America. It is more than industrial sabotage it is a program to destroy our economy, our standard of living, our freedoms and our very way of life. The same lies are repeated over and over again and too few Americans are able to see through them.


4 posted on 02/07/2012 9:13:47 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

Keep it coming!


5 posted on 02/07/2012 9:29:57 AM PST by bayouranger (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
Ezra Levant calls it industrial sabotage and, based on their own Power Point, that certainly seems an apt description:

Energy is one of the most pressing looming problems for every resident of the country in every way imagineable.

Anyone have any kind of a theory of the purpose for this baffling move by the Rockefeller whatsit?

6 posted on 02/07/2012 9:34:15 AM PST by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
The Rockefeller fund has been taken over by the leftist/environmentalists who can't seem to get a job in private industry, but can find employment in all the leftist non-profits. It's perfect for them. It's other peoples money and they believe that they are the best ones to decide where it goes.
7 posted on 02/07/2012 9:43:14 AM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

fortunately $28 mil is a drop in the bucket compared to all those who stand to gain from this pipeline


8 posted on 02/07/2012 9:57:20 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

The only rational conclusion I can come to is Totalitarianism.

Their left-wing ideology of creating a utopia is based on one fundamental principle, destroy free enterprise so as to replace it with their perceived perfect system.

Think of Cuba or North Korea. All are subservient to the “philosopher kings”, the ideology.


9 posted on 02/07/2012 9:59:11 AM PST by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
The Rockefeller fund has been taken over by the leftist/environmentalists who can't seem to get a job in private industry

A friend of mine who works in HR received a large file full of MBA candidate resumes from a large university. Every one of them had a curriculum focus on "sustainability" and "green". And I dare say not a one of them could land a job at your local Burger King.


10 posted on 02/07/2012 10:00:16 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

If John D. came back from the grave, his minions would have some ‘splainin’ to do.


11 posted on 02/07/2012 10:07:26 AM PST by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

-—A friend of mine who works in HR received a large file full of MBA candidate resumes from a large university. Every one of them had a curriculum focus on “sustainability” and “green”. And I dare say not a one of them could land a job at your local Burger King.-—

Amazing. I’ll pass this along. Shocking, but believeable.


12 posted on 02/07/2012 10:08:16 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

The same groups that Levant calls out, and their US affiliates and allies, are doing the same thing in the US. And not just by shutting down the Keystone project.

At the US federal level, for example, Section 526 of Public Law 110-140, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 states in its entirety:

No Federal agency shall enter into a contract for procurement of an alternative or synthetic fuel, including a fuel produced from nonconventional petroleum sources, for any mobility-related use, other than for research or testing, unless the contract specifies that the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production and combustion of the fuel supplied under the contract must, on an ongoing basis, be less than or equal to such emissions from the equivalent conventional fuel produced from conventional petroleum sources.

Like the titles of most federal legislation, the title, “Energy Independence and Security Act,” denotes precisely the opposite effect of the actual legislation.

At the state level, for example, California policy is heavily weighted against Canadian oil sands oil.

The fact is that the ruling elites are using climate change to engineer a system of global governance. The turmoil surrounding Albertan oil sands is just one front in their strategy to achieve that end.


13 posted on 02/07/2012 10:19:34 AM PST by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]




Click the pic       Thank you, JoeProBono

This Little Cutie Will Soon Be
Ready For His Bottle of Tabasco!


Become a monthly donor
And keep the FReepathon Dragons away

Sponsors will contribute $10
For each new monthly sign-up


14 posted on 02/07/2012 11:09:17 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson