Skip to comments.
Pelosi on Unemployment Benefits Extension: I’d rather not pay for it
Breitbart.TV ^
Posted on 02/06/2012 11:48:21 AM PST by Pacothecat
Pelosi: 'I Don't Want To Pay For It...Surcharge' The Rich For Doctors Visits and Unemployment Benefits
http://www.breitbart.tv/pelosi-on-unemployment-benefits-extension-id-rather-not-pay-for-it/
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: braking; communism; corruption; crushthedemocrats; democrats; eattherich; elections; fraud; govtabuse; healthcare; liberalfascism; liberals; nancypelosi; nannystate; nodemocrats2012; obamacare; pelosi; progressives; redistribution; richdemocratvoters; shadowparty; soaktherich; socialism; socialistdemocrats; socialisthealthcare; spreadthewealth; stealthewealth; surcharge; taxcheatparty; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Pacothecat
2
posted on
02/06/2012 11:50:09 AM PST
by
sappy
(criminaldems)
To: Pacothecat
What I want to know is when the FTC is coming after her for insider-trading.
Congress is covered by the current law. The FTC has said as much.
3
posted on
02/06/2012 11:54:05 AM PST
by
Joe the Pimpernel
(Too many lawmakers, too many laws, too many lawyers.)
To: sappy
Please Lord a 15 on the Rickter(sp?) Scale Earthquake for 15 Minutes Epicenter-Fisherman’s Wharf while she is in the district get rid of Her, Boxer and Feinstein and thier WORTHLESS District @ the SAME time!
4
posted on
02/06/2012 11:54:16 AM PST
by
US Navy Vet
(Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
To: Pacothecat
I propose the following. A 100% tax on every dollar a politician and spouse make about the base salary for their position.
5
posted on
02/06/2012 11:54:23 AM PST
by
Drill Thrawl
(The damage is too extensive. Burn it down and start over.)
To: Pacothecat
I musta missed that part in the Constitution that says “tax the rich and give it to the parasitic multitudes”.
6
posted on
02/06/2012 11:57:25 AM PST
by
traditional1
(Stay thirsty, my friends.)
To: US Navy Vet
I just need 3weeks.
I’m leaving this hell hole for North Carolina for good with my family. California lost yet another taxpaying family.
7
posted on
02/06/2012 11:57:56 AM PST
by
sappy
(criminaldems)
To: Pacothecat
Whatever happened to “equal protection” under law?
8
posted on
02/06/2012 12:04:41 PM PST
by
tractorman
(I never miss a chance to tweak a liberal.)
To: sappy
she is the rich.Yes, that's one of her (and Warren Buffett's) talking points. So what?
We used to let charitable organizations help the needy when and where they determined help was needed.
But, since the SCOTUS decided "promote the general welfare" means Congress can do just about anything it damn well pleases, charities (and the accountability they naturally exercise) will soon be relics of a bygone era.
9
posted on
02/06/2012 12:05:42 PM PST
by
newgeezer
(It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
To: traditional1
I think it's a penumbra that emanates from the Kelo decision.
-PJ
10
posted on
02/06/2012 12:06:00 PM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
To: sappy
she is the rich.Yes, but remember, the "Law" does not apply to Dems. /sarcasm>
11
posted on
02/06/2012 12:06:13 PM PST
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
To: tractorman
Whatever happened to equal protection under law?Not sure that applies here. No doubt the libs deem this to be more like the progressive income tax rates where the "rich" get to pay more than do "working families" (in Dem-speak).
12
posted on
02/06/2012 12:10:07 PM PST
by
newgeezer
(It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
To: Pacothecat
Years of botox use has finally destroyed what few brain cells Pelosi had left. Unfortunately she keeps on getting re-elected because the district that she represents are a bunch of far left whack job kooks. Hey Nancy, I got news for ya, you are RICH, I say we raid her wallet and just go nuts
To: sappy
If you’re headed to the Charlotte region, might I suggest you locate just across the border in South Carolina? Lower income tax, no estate tax, lower property & sales taxes & lower motor-fuels taxes. Unfortunately, NC in general, and Charlotte specifically is being over-run by liberals, and they’ve never seen a tax they haven’t liked.
14
posted on
02/06/2012 12:10:51 PM PST
by
Be Free
(Liberalism is a disease.)
To: traditional1
I musta missed that part in the Constitution that says tax the rich and give it to the parasitic multitudes.No problem. That's why we have the SCOTUS--to show us what we missed!
Welcome to the oligarchy, where any 5 robed oligarchs can rule supreme over the unwashed masses.
15
posted on
02/06/2012 12:13:43 PM PST
by
newgeezer
(It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
To: newgeezer
It’s actually the Commerce Clause that is used expansively, but your point is well taken. It has given us the war on poverty and the war on drugs, which many here shamelessly support.
16
posted on
02/06/2012 12:18:53 PM PST
by
Ken H
(Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
To: sappy
Welcome, help us elect a republican governor and turn state bright red although Obozo didn't really win this state last time, FRAUD.
17
posted on
02/06/2012 12:22:10 PM PST
by
boomop1
(term limits is the only way to save this country.)
To: Pacothecat
Hey Nancy!
You’re not rich because of superior intellect or inovation.
You’re rich because you are corrupt!
Why don’t we impose a 90% tax on folks like you?
18
posted on
02/06/2012 12:23:50 PM PST
by
G Larry
(I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
To: G Larry
What if the rich leave the country, Nancy. Then what? Because YOU are driving them out.
Hmmm? Then what?
Imagine all these people needing help ..and no “rich” to pay for it.
No middle class either.
Imagine it.
Nancy, you STINK. BADLY.
To: Pacothecat
" Pelosi: 'Surcharge' The Rich For Doctors Visits and Unemployment Benefits " was not the published title and had to be changed.
Please do not make up your own title or alter published titles.
Thanks.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson