Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Occupy LA members want city to return murals
KABC) -- ^ | Monday, February 06, 2012

Posted on 02/06/2012 10:40:42 AM PST by BenLurkin

While the Occupy Los Angeles encampment has been gone for several weeks now, a few remnants of the protest are being stored by the city.

The Department of Cultural Affairs is now trying to find a new home for several large murals that were painted at the encampment.

But Occupy L.A. organizers argue the murals should be released to them, saying in a letter that the city "misunderstands the true purpose and value" of the murals.

"By naming them 'artifact,' you describe our once-living art as lifeless and attempt to frame our movement as such," the letter read. "We assure you that the occupation is very much alive and well."

The works were painted on plywood built to protect a fountain outside of city hall, while hundreds of people camped on the lawn.

Groups interested in the murals have until 5 p.m. Monday to submit their proposal.

(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: graffiti; murals; occupy; occupyla; occupywallstreet; ows
Dear City of L.A.,
Burn the ugly things. Please.


1 posted on 02/06/2012 10:40:43 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“By naming them ‘artifact,’ you describe our once-living art as lifeless and attempt to frame our movement as such,” the letter read. “We assure you that the occupation is very much alive and well.”

That’s one of the most idiotic “arguments” I’ve ever heard.


2 posted on 02/06/2012 10:44:20 AM PST by youngidiot (Hear Hear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Here's a more appropriate label:


3 posted on 02/06/2012 10:53:36 AM PST by Jack of all Trades (Hold your face to the light, even though for the moment you do not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The works were painted on plywood built to protect a fountain outside of city hall...

In other words, the plywood was paid for using taxpayer dollars, and the "occupiers" are guilty of vandalizing taxpayer-owned property...

4 posted on 02/06/2012 10:57:14 AM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25% MORE sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They should have been burned the day after they were removed.


5 posted on 02/06/2012 11:07:15 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Now come on folks. They’re right. The murals have the same value as used toilet paper. That Occupy Los Angeles folks should want them back is indicative of who they are and what they do, and of their value to society.


6 posted on 02/06/2012 11:11:45 AM PST by righttackle44 (I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Send it all to the city dump along with the other garbage that had to be hauled away from the protest site.

Then OWS can occupy the landfill.


7 posted on 02/06/2012 11:17:00 AM PST by kennedy (No relation to those other Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

“The Department of Cultural Affairs is now trying to find a new home for several large murals that were painted at the encampment.”

I hear CA has massive budget shorfalls. I’d offer the following advice at no charge:

1. Track down the vandals. Punish those found guilty in a court of law. Restitution for all costs mandatory. Public service mandatory.

2. Don’t allow any further Occutard events. There’s a pattern of Occutards abusing a privilege to use public facilities and causing great expense to the public. Enough already.

3. Fire everyone at the ‘Department of Cultural Affairs’ or re-assign them to something actually useful - like lowering taxes and regulations to make a more business friendly environment.

4. Fire everyone in State and Local government who is too stupid to agree with 1- 3. They’re better off finding a new life in the benito obamalini’s ‘green jobs’ economy.


8 posted on 02/06/2012 11:25:00 AM PST by Made In The USA (This post may be recorded for quality purposes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

ha ha...these murals are the great accomplishments of their lives...the hardest they’ve ever worked. How pathetic.


9 posted on 02/06/2012 11:28:38 AM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

Bump that!


10 posted on 02/06/2012 11:38:52 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
They should have been burned the day after they were removed.

Can't do that. Have to get permits, environmental study would have to be done, lawyers would get involved, it could go on and on.

Remember, this is L.A.

11 posted on 02/06/2012 11:39:43 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Groups interested in the murals have until 5 p.m. Monday to submit their proposal.

Some will say the groups will be paying that's a few bucks to offset OLA costs but it's vandalism and should be treated as trash and permanently disposed of to send a message this sort of thing won't be tolerated and treated with reverence in the future. Oh sure, OLA will try to make it a rallying point but even Bill Maher is telling Occupy to go home.

L.A.'s gov't identifies with the Occupiers, however, so they won't send the right message, protecting the Public's property from childish malcontents.

12 posted on 02/06/2012 11:45:08 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I don’t suppose they see any hypocrisy in a movement that decries private property rights now demanding that the city turn over “their” property ...


13 posted on 02/06/2012 11:45:51 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

“In other words, the plywood was paid for using taxpayer dollars, and the “occupiers” are guilty of vandalizing taxpayer-owned property...”

Bingo. Charge the people who are claiming ownership with vandalism and be done with it.


14 posted on 02/06/2012 11:56:55 AM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Auction it off, to recoup some of the money that Occupy cost the city.


15 posted on 02/06/2012 12:00:20 PM PST by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

What you do is you take them over to the Fire Department training school and let them burn them to train the Firefighters.


16 posted on 02/06/2012 12:32:32 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Better yet, they get it back after people get to treat it the same way OWS treated city and private property during the protest.


17 posted on 02/06/2012 5:10:37 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Like all socialists, they greatly overvalue their own contribution. I’ve seen better art on a passing boxcar.


18 posted on 02/06/2012 7:47:55 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Maybe the police should return action and let the K9s poop on them.


19 posted on 02/06/2012 8:08:59 PM PST by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson