Mitt fits in there with McCain and Dole in his non electability. Many of us scratched our heads when they were nominated to run for POTUS.
Romney is the ideal candidate for Obama. Unenthusiastic Republicans will stand down and not vote at all; the biased and vicious media will turn its attention to Romney. Why elect a Democrat-lite when you can elect a true socialist Democrat? What an easy choice!
No matter what, I WILL NOT vote for Romney. If he became, heaven forbid, the Republican nominee, he still will not get my vote. There are many others, here and elsewhere, in the rest of the country, who feel this way. I feel very safe in saying that a nomination of Willard is a guarantee of harm to the Republican party. I might even go so far as to say that, were he the nominee, I would not vote Republican for any position. Period. I cannot vote democrat, as a Catholic. That’s immutable. But if the establishment of the RNC wants to lose the 2012 election, and I mean BIG TIME, all they need to do is make Willard the candidate.
I posted this vanity last week: 'Mr. Electability?' SuperLoserMan Mitt not viable candidate...0-17 in 'road' races [Vanity]
When you total ALL of Romney's wide-open voter races (which discounts caucuses), he is 0-for-17 in races "on the road"...away from his home turf of...
...New England (where he lives...he attended Harvard)
...Michigan (where he grew up)
...and Mormon-laden Utah (he went to BYU and oversaw the Utah Winter Olympics)
In those road races...
* The South hasn't embraced Romney...he's lost South Carolina -- twice, and Florida, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, and Tennessee rejected him last election cycle;
* The Midwest? Nope. They didn't want Mitt Romney, either, last cycle (Missouri, Illinois, Oklahoma);
* Beyond Mormon Utah, a Romney "home field" advantage to the tune of receiving 94 percent of the Mormon vote, the West didn't want him in '08 (Arizona; New Mexico; California);
* Surely the East Coast would be "open arms" for a fellow East Coaster. Right? Wrong! In 2008, Connecticut, Delaware, New York, and New Jersey rejected Romney!
Mitt's even lost two races in New England! ('94 Senate race in MA; '08 primary in Maine!)
Sadly, I fear Romney is more electable, but that is not a compliment to him but rather an indictment of the mentality of the voting public.
Because that's what most polls have shown.
Lessee...
Obama beat McCain, McCain beat Romney, so (using some kind of brilliant logic no sane person has ever heard of) Romney is the only person who can beat Obama.
IOW, the loser to the loser can be the winner?
Perhaps RINOmney is electable.
But not by me.
Don’t worry, I’d nevah vote for the Cretin either.
Romney’s father George was born in Mexico.
so was George a US citizen at birth? or a Mexican citizen? if a Mexican citizen, did he cross the border illegally? are there naturalization papers? are those papers dated pre or post Mitts Birth?
Is Mitt Romney eligible for the presidency? or is he the perfect cover for Obama not being eligible?
“Is Mitt Romney Actually Electable?”
More than that, he not eligible. Read the following:
Mitt Romney’s Father Was A Mexican Citizen When Mitt Was Born.
Romney will only carry 1 of the “ 57 States” and that is Utah but only by a few % points.
Romney did not make 50% in that Governor election he won, he left office with 34% approval, wrecked the state party, and Dems have held the seat ever since.
