Posted on 01/27/2012 3:51:49 PM PST by jazusamo
Cry me a river. General Motors' CEO is complaining that the Chevy Volt has become a "political punching bag."
As the Detroit Free Press reports ,
GM CEO Dan Akerson defended the Volt before a House of Representatives subcommittee Wednesday, saying that the hybrid electric vehicle seemed to be under attack as much for political as practical reasons. 'We did not design the Volt to become a political punching bag, and thats what its become,' Akerson said.
The optics of Akerson, CEO of a company whose very existence today stems completely from an infusion of tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer money, whining about political complaints about his company, is ironic, and insulting to the taxpayers who were forced to fund the bailout of GM.
If it were not for tens of billions of taxpayer dollars, GM would not exist today, certainly not in its current form. Years and years of bad management and the harmful impact of the excessive demands of its labor unions brought GM to the brink of oblivion. GM lost market share as customers increasingly preferred products from its competitors.
That's the way it works - you make lousy, overpriced products, you lose customers to competitors who are making products customers want and sell them at prices customers are happy to pay.
That's the way it works in a free market. In this Obamic era of crony socialism, you can make crappy products and keep prices high and still stay in business if you have an ace in the hole. GM's ace in the hole: a unionized labor force that supported President Obama in his 2008 campaign. Once elected, Obama move swiftly to take tens of billions of dollars from the taxpayers and gave it to GM, a payoff to Big Labor for backing him in his 2008 election campaign.
The bailout transferred tens of billions of dollars from the taxpayers to General Motors, money which will never be repaid.
At the same time, Obama's administration created new tax breaks specifically designed to get people to buy Chevy's new electric car, and spent billions of dollars subsidizing the supply chain that provides parts and components for the Volt.
According to a recent research study from the Mackinac Center for Public Policy , total taxpayer subsidies in the Chevy Volt amount to as much as $250,000 per car:
Each Chevy Volt sold thus far may have as much as $250,000 in state and federal dollars in incentives behind it a total of $3 billion altogether, according to an analysis by James Hohman, assistant director of fiscal policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Hohman looked at total state and federal assistance offered for the development and production of the Chevy Volt, General Motors plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. His analysis included 18 government deals that included loans, rebates, grants and tax credits. The amount of government assistance does not include the fact that General Motors is currently 26 percent owned by the federal government.
The Volt subsidies flow through multiple companies involved in production. The analysis includes adding up the amount of government subsidies via tax credits and direct funding for not only General Motors, but other companies supplying parts for the vehicle. ... GM has estimated theyve sold 6,000 Volts so far. That would mean each of the 6,000 Volts sold would be subsidized between $50,000 and $250,000, depending on how many government subsidy milestones are realized."
Politics is the system by which the people make public policy and taxpayer money is divvied up. Given the flood of taxpayer-funded subsidies required in order for GM to put one on the showroom floor, the Volt is the most political car in American history.
The market certainly isn't clamoring for the Volt - sales have been lackluster, with only a few thousand sold. But because the car is the creation of politics rather than market demand, GM continues to increase production.
The Volt may have failed in the marketplace. It owes its existence to politics. If GM's CEO doesn't want the car to be a "political punching bag," he ought to reject the ongoing subsidies and give the taxpayers back their money. He won't do that, of course. He can't sell more than a few thousand Volts at a heavily-subsidized final retail price of $32,500, much less the $50,000 to $250,000 the cars actually cost to make.
Everyone should be contacting their representatives in congress to support Rep. Mike Kellys bill to kill the $7,500 tax credit.
This tax credit is for all EVs that qualify and includes the Chevy Volt and Nissan Leaf.
Leftists do not tolerate expressed dissent.

"We got your money, now shut up!"
No way in hell I EVER purchase another Chevy or Chrysler.
I don’t want anything from Government Motors.
With enron inbankruptcy, volt is headed for intensive care.
Who wants a volt when there are no batteries?
Hussein gives GM to the unions in violation of Federal bankruptcy laws and the taxpayers aren’t supposed to comlain?
Do any of the photoshoppers have a pic of a crying baby with the words, “That racist!” they can post?
I know it doesn’t make sense but I’m just imagining the Watermelons (green-skinned and Red on the inside) will say that the reason people aren’t buying the Dolt is because they are racist!
Enron made batteries?
I was raised by a father who drove nothing but Chevy.
I was happy driving Chevy —until my wife bought this Lincoln Continental. And when GM was fisted by club Obama I decided I will NEVER buy another Government owned Garage Mans Companion. (Dad did have a VW back in 67 and it was a lot of fun—But our Govt. doesn’t have the same stuff the Germans had except by importation.)
I believe the Volt won’t spend long in intensive care, it’s headed for the graveyard in the U.S.
GM and SAIC (a Chinese company) will be producing it in China, they’ve already signed on the line.
Government motors can go jump in a flaming lake of shorted and burning Volts, on their way to bankruptcy and irrelevancy. I’ll continue to bash them and their products with much enthusiasm and glee. From the time of the bailouts, I immediately traded in mt GMC truck and bought a new F-150, and I’ll never buy any of their products ever again. They are as dead to me as Matt Drudge and Ann Coulter became this week.
Well, at least we taxpayers got our money back from their bail out and a profit to boot to help with the deficit!
I'm sure the GM bond holders will back up my statements to. /s
I’ll qualify that. GM and SAIC signed to produce electric vehicles in China and GM assured everyone here they wouldn’t give the Volt technology to them, I don’t believe that for a second.
If I started a steam power car (lets call it exCTcitizenSteamer), I won’t ask the government to subsidize it. Stanley Steamer didn’t ask for them. Neither did Pope-Hartford, Locomobile or even American Motors.
Sure GM.
Be honest. Obama instructed you to say that.
You know it’s true. Thing is,.. so do Americans.
I sure hope they didn't design the Volt for profit! (This would be an indication of incredible stupidity.)
ML/NJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.