Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/27/2012 2:47:40 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: neverdem

BTTT


2 posted on 01/27/2012 2:48:31 PM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

So what happens if she doesn’t recuse herself? Can the Republican House impeach her?


5 posted on 01/27/2012 2:55:06 PM PST by KansasGirl (Romney to Santorum: Obamneycare "nothing to get angry about".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Case closed in a nation of laws.

We are not in a nation of laws, albeit it is an emerging police state.


6 posted on 01/27/2012 2:56:11 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Didn’t she flat out lie about it during the Senate confirmation hearings?


7 posted on 01/27/2012 2:57:25 PM PST by djf (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2801220/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

What happens if it is 4-4 on the individual mandate? We have had different rullings from the appellate courts.


8 posted on 01/27/2012 3:01:02 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

9 posted on 01/27/2012 3:03:12 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It would seem like the case is closed, but I’ll be shocked if she does recuse.


11 posted on 01/27/2012 3:05:04 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


12 posted on 01/27/2012 3:12:56 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

More info here, too:

“Obamacare Litigation: More “Golden” Reasons Why Justice Kagan May Need to Recuse Herself”

http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/13/obamacare-litigation-more-“golden”-reasons-why-justice-kagan-may-need-to-recuse-herself/


13 posted on 01/27/2012 3:15:50 PM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

She won’t recuse and no power that we have can make her. Even so, the vote would then just become 4 to 4 just for spite.


15 posted on 01/27/2012 3:26:04 PM PST by itsahoot (You are no longer a person, you are now a Unit when you need health care.{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I don’t see how any ethical lawyer adhering to professional codes of conduct could not consider that they need to recuse themselves from this case,” he said.
...........................................................

We are talking about ethical lawyers are we not?

I believe that probably lets her out.


16 posted on 01/27/2012 3:26:56 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It is apparent that anyone on the inside circle of the Obozo or of power and wealth doesn’t need to be concerned about our laws. At the expense of the common citizen, those people are above the LAW. Even John Roberts needs to be b**ch slapped over his stand on this Kagan recusal issue. The Obozo is an illegal president and every justice on that court knows it so they accept two illegal supreme court justices as well. The US is worse than a banana republic. We had the means and the wherewithal to stop the erosion of enforcement of our laws for those of power and wealth but so far we have stood and done nothing.


17 posted on 01/27/2012 3:30:09 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
“Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy.”

Unless she would be hearing an appeal of an particular case in which she participated, I don't think the quoted section would apply (but if such a case does come before her, refusal would obviously be required). If the section were read so broadly as to suggest that her participation on one case involving Obamacare would disqualify her from hearing others, such a reading would also require that when a case comes before the court regarding a matters which the court has previously decided, any judges who were on the court when the previous case was decided would be required to recuse themselves--clearly absurd.

20 posted on 01/27/2012 3:49:07 PM PST by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Here is the bigger question. Has she told her fellow jurists the same lie. If so will they see this a as breach of ethics and sanction her?


21 posted on 01/27/2012 4:39:47 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Did she state before her confirmation hearing that she had nothing to do with the health care law???


23 posted on 01/27/2012 4:47:25 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy.” <<<

I see the loop hole!...2nd word!...it says “he”

Gonna need a TSA employee with latex gloves to make a ruling...

26 posted on 01/27/2012 5:37:28 PM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy.” <<<

I see the loop hole!...2nd word!...it says “he”

Gonna need a TSA employee with latex gloves to make a ruling...

27 posted on 01/27/2012 5:37:46 PM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
The Decline of Violence - Neuroscientist Steven Pinker on the triumph of peace and prosperity over death and destruction

No Need to Panic About Global Warming

Slashing America's Defense: A Suicidal Trajectory

Issa Demands Access to Second US Attorney who Supervised Operation Fast and Furious

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

28 posted on 01/27/2012 5:46:12 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; Jet Jaguar; Lady Jag; Slings and Arrows; maggief; Dog; BP2; Candor7; ...

SWEET PING


32 posted on 01/27/2012 9:23:46 PM PST by bitt (Socialism works great until you run out of Chinese money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

JACK CADE.
Valiant I am.
SMITH [aside].
‘A must needs; for beggary is valiant.

JACK CADE.
I am able to endure much.

DICK [aside].
No question of that; for I have seen him whipp’d three market-days together.

JACK CADE.
I fear neither sword nor fire.

SMITH [aside].
He need not fear the sword; for his coat is of proof.

DICK [aside].
But methinks he should stand in fear of fire, being burnt i’ th’hand for stealing of sheep.

You can almost hear the rim-shot after everything Dick or Smith say here.
Cade proceeds to go more and more over the top, and begins to describe his absurd ideal world:

JACK CADE.
Be brave, then; for your captain is brave, and vows reformation. There shall be in England seven half-penny loaves sold for a penny: the three-hoop’d pot shall have ten hoops; and I will make it felony to drink small beer: all the realm shall be in common; and in Cheapside shall my palfrey go to grass: and when I am king,- as king I will be,-
ALL.
God save your majesty!

Appreciated and encouraged, he continues on in this vein:
JACK CADE.
I thank you, good people:- there shall be no money; all shall eat and drink on my score; and I will apparel them all in one livery, that they may agree like brothers, and worship me their lord.
And here is where Dick speaks the famous line.
DICK.
The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.


35 posted on 01/28/2012 5:24:50 AM PST by Karliner ( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28, Romans 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson