Posted on 01/27/2012 12:18:49 PM PST by mitchell001
Does the thought of Mitt Romney, a devout Mormon and Mormon leader, becoming President scare you? After reading this testimonial of an ex-Mormon ((http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_packham/why.html)), I am scared of Mitt Romney becoming President. Remember when Barack Obama was seeking the nomination in 2008, his 20 year attendance at Jerimiah Wright's church where radical preaching took place was glossed over by the American public and the press. I say we do not make the same mistake with Mitt Romney and his leadership role in the Mormon Church. In the GOP nominating process, let's explore Mitt's Mormon beliefs. Am I totally off base? Please read the link on the ex-Mormon above!
Who you callin' MINOR???
Your umbrage is noted.
So true!
I'll leave my place there open for you.
Worry not; Ma'am. For there are 50,000 of us to counter them!
Zechariah 4:10
"Who despises the day of small things? Men will rejoice when they see the plumb line in the hand of Zerubbabel. "(These seven are the eyes of the LORD, which range throughout the earth.)"
ce in response to
“amazing that none of the mormons in poltical office or who have been in political office tried to kill us or turn us into devils
ou posted
“ You wouldn’ t know it if they did dingbat”
Nice civility
and makes no sense
if in the past 50 years of Mormons holding various elected offices they tried to kill us you think no one would have noticed? either that or they failed 100%
Or is it soooooo secret people were killed and no one noticed?
whooooooooo scary.
Did it ever occur to you that Mormons might be lying to you? Lying for the Lord is common in Mormonism as a way to make the LDS church look good. I was lied to by Mormon missionaries when I was ‘investigating’ the Mormon church (pre internet days). I was lied to by leadership about LDS history and spent almost a year really researching it which is why I left. The leaders were lying to the members.
It is not bigotry to post the writings of LDS leaders which is most of what we do.
Do your own research, Mormons aren’t Christians - their theology precludes it. In a case like Jeff Head, he (like most LDS) use Christian terms but mean something very different. Here is an example of how the LDS twist things.
http://www.utlm.org/newsletters/no115.htm#lying
http://www.mormonthink.com/lying.htm
http://www.exmormon.org/lying.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKt7ozdKeBk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zA-rZQB-xQ
http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,377612
http://archives.exmormon.org/test2
http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,356481
From an earlier post of mine about lying in Mormonism. Telling half truths is also lying.
The LDS dont do systematic theology. For years the closest thing was Bruce R. McConkies Mormon Doctrine. Now that has been thrown under the bus because some of his statements are embarassing to the LDS church even though they have not reputiated anything said in there and it was approved by the Prophet and Apostles and published by the main LDS publishing company (an LDS version of nihil obstat or imprimitur). The LDS use manuals, published every few years, on a rotation for Sunday School, Priesthood/Relief Society and their High School and College religion classes.
They are also discouraged from researching on their own or reading old primary sources. Sadly, they are spoon fed theology in a manner that keeps them from looking too deep. My crime as it were was going beyond the manuals given to me and actually trying to make sense and research LDS history and doctrine in order to prove the antis were lying.As to why I lied about LDS beliefs (or dissembled), there is a constantly used phrase/idea that comes down from the leadership of every member a missionary. It means that every member is to try to convert people to Mormonism. Couple that with the other oftused meme of dont do anything that makes the Church look bad and you have an interesting combination. The why gets down to these. It is easier to lie or omit things or twist words than it is to explain what the LDS really believe and risk losing a potential convert or have someone go away thinking less than glowing things about the LDS church.
Every member is expected to find investigators (people who would be interested in converting who take the missionary discussions - similar to RCIA). There is also a lot of people who hear things about beliefs but dont know enough to know what the LDS are saying, that they use different meanings for terms, even though the LDS usually know that Christians mean different things. A typical exchange could go like this...
non - LDS - I have a lot of Mormon friends, and they are nice people, but dont Mormons believe Jesus and Satan are brothers?
LDS - No! We dont believe that at all! Jesus is the only begotten Son of God! Joseph Smith saw Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ and they said that all other churches had some problems and Joseph needed to start a Church that was the same as the one when Jesus Christ was on the Earth. Why dont you come over for dinner and we will have the missionaries talk to you? There is a set of 6 discussions that they give that shows what we believe.
non-LDS - Well, ok, but I read somewhere that Mormons believe they will become Gods
LDS - That was probably written by someone who has a grudge against the Church. They probably are one of the ones who gets paid to badmouth the Church or someone who couldnt live by the principles of the Church so they left or they were offended by someone in their ward.
Ok, lets parse this. Notice how many times the Church is used. For the LDS it is all about the Church. LDS testimonies often start out with I know the Church is true.
Then there is the automatic denial that Jesus and Satan are brothers. We saw it on this a thread the other day even. Now, all LDS know that their church teaches Jesus and Satan are spirit brothers. So why would you get a resounding NO? Because it makes their theology look silly. By stating No the LDS are lying to you, but they are thinking Well they arent flesh brothers, just spirit brothers like we all are, Jesus is our Elder brother. The other day an LDS came on one of these threads and stated Jesus and Lucifer arent brothers, as if by Mary!. Notice the subtlety of it. As if by Mary implying they arent physical brothers (which no one claimed). But they left out That Lucifer was the second born and Jesus was the firstborn of the spirit children.
Next we come to what would appear to be a rebuttal to the claim Jesus and Satan are brothers. Jesus is the only begotten Son of God! what they are not telling you is that they mean it in a literal sense. Jesus and Satan are SPIRIT brothers (like all of us) but Jesus is Gods physical son, God came down, had sex with Mary and conceived Jesus. So it isnt a rebuttal at all and the LDS know that. They are intentionally twisting words to make you think they dont believe Jesus and Satan are Spirit brothers.
Next Phrase - Joseph Smith saw Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ and they said that all other churches had some problems and Joseph needed to start a Church that was the same as the one when Jesus Christ was on the Earth. This is referring to the First Vision (of which there are several contradictory accounts) and the Great Apostasy. The LDS will tone down things said about other Christians. In the first vision account, Smith isnt told that other churches had problems he was told I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt http://lds.org/library/display/0,4945,104-1-3-4,00.html
All wrong, Corrupt and Creeds an abomination are not the same as some problems and the LDS know that. But they will soften it in order to not scare people off or to put the LDS church in a better light.
Next - about becoming Gods. Notice the LDS response is to go down a rabbit hole, rather than addressing the comment. Instead they lead the person to believe that the source was unreliable, or written by someone who had something to gain (money) or a former Mormon with a grudge. The question itself isnt even addressed (lying by omission). It also causes the person to think that they might be wrong and that the LDS dont believe that, even though the LDS person knows they do.
Finally, the invitation to meet with the missionaries. There is an assumption by many that these are people who know more about Mormonism than the average member and that isnt true either. Most men and quite a few women serve LDS missions (I nearly did). They dont have special knowledge. They also dont tell you is the goal of those 6 discussions is to get you baptized Mormon and there is pressure put on you to read the Book of Mormon, pray about it, make commitments and convert. Those 6 discussions arent just a summary of LDS beliefs, they are the requirements for conversion and that is their goal. But they dont tell you that, they make it sound like this is just a friendly way of talking to knowledgeable people about what the LDS believe.
Also, there is the doctrine of line upon line, precept upon precept or milk before meat, that coverts are only told doctrines when they are spiritually ready to hear them. The missionary discussions are the barest of milk. You learn one set of things in them, and then after you convert you start to learn the rest of LDS theology. Then after a year of faithful membership (sometimes more) you get to go to the LDS temple and learn the meat doctrines and are sworn to secrecy (used to have to swear blood oaths).
Faith, belief, scripture, and doctrine are central issues in judging a person in many situations, but the externalized values and resulting actions are the critical factors in choosing a political leader.
... and I contend that a person's faith and beliefs are the critical factors in determining an individual's externalized values and resulting actions. In other words, you act according to your beliefs.
I know quite a few Mormons, some of them very well, and several would be on a par with some of our top conservatives in their suitability for the White House ...
... in which case, they are not true believing Mormons. As explained HERE and in many other posts by members of the Flying Inman Viper Squad (the term coined by LDS used by them from time to time to denote persons who challenge their beliefs), many of the core tenets of Mormonism are not compatible with the democratic principles upon which this Republic is based. Mormons have to reject numerous teachings of their prophets and holy scriptures in order to govern our society with causing it terrible harm.
anti-Mormon bigotry on FR
Almost all of what is passed off as anti-Mormon bigotry on Free Republic is in reality nothing more than people providing annotated facts (and in some cases personal experiences of ex-Mormons) concerning Mormonism ... and the vast majority of their data is taken directly from LDS sources and historical records. Saints are offered an opportunity to rebut the replies and apologies are offered along with retractions if the information provided is not correct.
Alternatively, it is common to resort to ad hominem responses (i.e. attack an opponent's character rather than answer the contentions made) when unable to make a credible and reasoned response. Blanket use of the term anti-Mormon is one of the most blatant examples of that practice.
The fact that he is a temple Mormon unequivically means he believes what the LDS church teaches. It is an all or nothing proposition. If you don’t believe you leave like I did.
To me his religion matters because it shows his gulliblity and worldview. He thinks he will become a god, and he believes in a very different God.
Do your research. It matters to me that he wears a apron in the Temple that is the apron of Lucifer’s priesthood. In 1990, however, they changed the ETERNAL ENDOWMENT ceremony (right there red flag) and removed the part about ministers being hirelings of Satan. However, they did leave this part in....
www.ldsendowment.org
THE APRON
[Lucifer returns as Adam is eating the fruit.]
LUCIFER: That is right.
EVE: [To Adam.] It is better for us to pass through sorrow that we may know the good from the evil. [To Lucifer.] I know thee now. Thou art Lucifer, he who was cast out of Fathers presence for rebellion.
LUCIFER: Yes. You are beginning to see already.
ADAM: What is that apron you have on?
LUCIFER: It is an emblem of my power and priesthoods.
ADAM: Priesthoods?
LUCIFER: Yes, priesthoods.
ADAM: I am looking for Father to come down to give us further instructions.
LUCIFER: Oh, you are looking for Father to come down, are you?
[Elohim and Jehovah are heard speaking outside the Garden Room.]
ELOHIM: Jehovah, we promised Adam that we would visit him and give him further instructions. Come, let us go down.
JEHOVAH: We will go down, Elohim.
ADAM: I hear their voices; they are coming.
LUCIFER: Seeyou are naked. Take some fig leaves and make you aprons. Father will see your nakedness. Quick! Hide!
[Lucifer withdraws from view.]
ADAM: Brethren and sisters, put on your aprons.
I can be prepared, have survival skills and extra food without being Mormon.
If you talk to ex-mo’s you will often hear stories about how much food they wasted on their requirements to be prepared. It is a hoarding mentality.
Sure - check it out from the source:’
www.irr.org/mit
www.utlm.org
www.mormonoutreach.org
www.mrm.org
www.ldsendowment.org
www.exmormon.org
Not if it was his church that taught him it is ok to lie to get what he wants or to further the goals of said organization.
I expected the media and the democrats to bring up religion, but not conservatives.
- - — -
Why not? For conservatives faith, worldview and beliefs matter.
As an ex-mormon I will say the “Temple of Doom” video is poorly done and a bit over the top. However, much of the info contained in it is accurate.
I recommend other sites for learing about Mormonism and its temples.
www.irr.org/mit
www.mormonoutreach.org
www.utlm.org
www.ldsendwoment.org
www.mrm.org
That FR of all places would be viewed as a haven for those who would castigate, call liars, demean, and marginalize such a group of people is beyond me and astounding.
- - - - - -
Take it up with your LDS leadership. We are just quoting your leaders and telling of our experiences.
What Romney the bishop, the ‘high priest’ thinks is mormonISM.
Romney is not a conservative, he is a liberal.
Romney is a liberal because of his mormonISM not in spite of it.
You keep making that claim, yet there is no evidence to support it. Please provide the source.
Probably after legalizing gay marriages in Massachussetts, he would legalize polygamy on national level *sarcastic grin*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.