Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/27/2012 8:02:56 AM PST by freedommom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: freedommom

This was not only about the birth certificate issue.
Orly Taitz got the point across about his ss#’s.

BOY HOW CAN THEY IGNORE THIS.


2 posted on 01/27/2012 8:05:11 AM PST by freedommom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedommom

“More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.”

Should read, “UNLESS Obama PROVES his eligibility, his name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.”

The burden of proof has ALWAYS been on the candidate. There is no need to prove he is not eligible to disqualify.


5 posted on 01/27/2012 8:07:52 AM PST by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedommom

Cautiously optimistic. If soetoro/obama/soebarkah/shabbaz is kept out of 1 state’s ballot, more states will follow.

With him out of the race, anyone can be the next real 44th president and prosecute obozo to the utmost.

We must not fall for any staged crisis which he and his gang will definitely manufacture should he be kept out of the race!


16 posted on 01/27/2012 8:22:05 AM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedommom

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2838364/posts

Read more at: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138. By Craig Andresen.

Court is called to order.

Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.

Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.

Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.

Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.

June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.

Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.

It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.

The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.

Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.

Carl Swinson takes the stand.

Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.

2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.

Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.

Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.

RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.

DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.

Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.

Dreams From My Father entered.

Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.

Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.

This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.

At this point, the judge takes a recess.

The judge returns.

David Farrar takes the stand.

Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.

Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.

Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.

State Licensed PI takes the stand.

She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.

Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.

Next witness takes the stand.

This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.

Linda Jordan takes the stand.

Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.

Next witness.

Mr. Gogt.

Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.

Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.

States this is a product of layering.

Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.

Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.

Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.

Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.

Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.

Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.

Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.

Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.

Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.

Taitz takes the stand herself.

Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.

Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.

Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.

And with that, the judge closes the hearing.


19 posted on 01/27/2012 8:25:18 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedommom

The sad part of this is that this information has been in play since BEFORE he was elected. And nobody did anything about it.

** HE IS A TOTAL FRAUD ** And nobody really knows who he is.
Yet, he was ALLOWED to become president. How corrupt and criminal is Washington??


23 posted on 01/27/2012 8:27:03 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedommom

Below is a list of the physical evidence introduced in today’s trial in GA. As Obama did not appear, he may be ruled ineligible to be on the Georgia ballot

.P2. Affidavit of Senior Deportation Officer with the Department of Homeland Security John Sampson, showing that Obama is using Connecticut SSN 042-68-4425 and stating, that there is no legitimate reason for him to use a Connecticut SSN, as he was never a resident of Connecticut.p3.

Affidavit of Adobe Illustrator expert Felicito Papa, showing Obama’s alleged true and correct copy of his birth certificate to be a computer generated forgery.P4. Affidavit of witness Linda Jordan, attesting to the fact, that SSN 042-68-4425, used by Obama, does not pass E-Verify.p6.

Selective service certificate showing Obama using SSN 042-68-4425 and official printout from Social Security Number Verification Services, showing that 042-68-4425 was never issued to Barack Obama, attached e-mail from Colonel Gregory Hollister.p7.

Affidavit of Adobe Illustrator expert Felicito Papa, showing that Obama is using CT SSN 042-68-4425 on his 2009 tax returns.p9.

Hawaiian birth certificate 61-00637 of Susan Nordyke, born a few hours after Obama in Kapiolani Hospital, looks completely different from alleged copy of birth certificate of Obama.

p10. Passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, mother of Barack Obama, showing Obama listed in her passport under the name Barack Obama Soebarkah, attached affidavit by Chris Strunk, recipient of Obama’s passport records under FOIA.p11.

Barack Obama’s Indonesian school registration card #203, date accepted January 1, 1968, released by the Associated Press in Indonesia, showing him using last name Soetoro and listing citizenship –Indonesia....


32 posted on 01/27/2012 8:40:09 AM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedommom
Obama, by way of government in Hawaii, have made it very difficult to examine Obama’s original BC. Orly Taitz has been granted discovery in another case, but Hawaiian officials are refusing to allow her access. They are stonewalling. The case the other day in Georgia is the first case being heard “on the merits”. Obama’s forged birth certificate was entered into evidence and experts testified that it was a forgery. Neither Obama nor his lawyers would participate in this case. In fact Obama defied a subpoena to appear.

In the following motion, Orly is asking the judge to exert authority on the officials in Hawaii to allow, require access to Obama’s original BC as is the case in Hawaiian law. This could finally force the issue and get Obama’s ORIGINAL BC (if one exists) into Georgia court for examination. The worm is turning.

Emergency motion for letters rogatory and commission

excerpt, complete document here:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Emergency-request-for-letters-rogatory1.pdf

“.........Under rule 338-18(9) access to the original records is allowed
(9) A person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction;
This court is a court of competent jurisdiction.
Plaintiff’s attorney has travelled to the state of HI 5 times at her own expense to obtain access to the original birth records under Federal Subpoena and under UIPA (unified Information practices Act) which is equal to the state of HI freedom of information act.
Director of Health Loretta Fuddy by and through her attorney, Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine is refusing to cooperate.

The only way to obtain cooperation, is through a letter rogatory from this court to the circuit court in the state of Hawaii, requesting commission for the Plaintiff’s attorney Orly Taitz, which would extend the jurisdiction of the Administrative court of the state of GA to the state of HI.
Plaintiff’s attorney has already instituted a legal action Taitz v Fuddy under UIPA and Agency appeal. The case is currently presided by Honorable Judge Rhonda Nishimura.
Georgia statute 9-26-11 states
“A commission or letters rogatory shall be issued only when necessary or convenient, on application and notice, and on such terms and with such directions as are just and appropriate. Officers may be designated in notices or commissions either by name or by descriptive title and letters rogatory may be addressed “To the Appropriate Judicial Authority in….”
Plaintiffs counsel is respectfully requesting this court for an emergency letter rogatory to Honorable judge Nishimura to either extend the subpoena from this court or to issue subpoena for the Director of Health Loretta Fuddy to appear at the January 26 2012 hearing and provide the book of records with Mr. Obama’s original 1961 birth certificate and the corresponding microfiche film. Respectfully submitted
Emergency motion for letters rogatory and commission 6
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
01.20.2012
I, Orly Taitz, attest that I served the plaintiff on 01.20.2012 by and through his counsel Michael Jablonski at Michael.Jablonsi@comcast.net
/s/ Orly Taitz
01.20.2012”

55 posted on 01/27/2012 9:10:17 AM PST by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedommom

AND NONE OF THE MAJOR NEWS MEDIA COVERED THIS STORY YESTERDAY!!!

And I was looking all night...


57 posted on 01/27/2012 9:14:26 AM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedommom

.

Canada Free Press:

(snip)

Who will save Freedom?
A brave few… This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.

“...Orly Taitz, who has made defending the Constitution and the American way of life a personal ambition, in the absence of any constitutional leadership.”

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999

.


69 posted on 01/27/2012 9:24:08 AM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!Ho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freedommom
do you think this is factual?? It was offered here:

The real issue in this is a President is not elected to these 49 United States, but Constitutionally must be elected by all 50 states, unless they have seceded from the Union as the Confederates did. Unless an event as that has taken place, the Constitution is not about Electoral Colleges or being ratified by Congress, but it is about the Union electing a President of all 50 states. Understand that any President can loose the popular vote as President Bush had, and win the electoral votes, along with numerous states, but no President can be President of these United States if he is not on the ballot or certified in all 50 states.

Scholars have missed this ultimate check and balance in the "silence of the Constitution". No state can keep any legal candidate off the ballot, but a state can keep anyone off the ballot who does not provide legal documentation they are qualified to be President. That is the Constitution at it's core in the Articles concerning the Presidency. 49 states can state a fraud can be President in their super majority, but if one state demands proof and the candidate does not provide that legal proof, the one state in checks and balances can negate a national Presidential Election.

...The experts will try to state that …….. can not override a majority vote by 49 other states, ……………..A President must be accepted by all 50 states according to legal Constitutional requirements. Any subject failing to provide natural born status can legally be rejected by any one state, and that one state in its minority rights will negate the other 49 states in the check and balance the Founders left silently in the Constitution to protect America from threats domestic and foreign.

.

106 posted on 01/27/2012 5:10:08 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson