Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Will this prompt a contempt of court charge? We shall soon find out.
1 posted on 01/25/2012 2:40:03 PM PST by Obama Exposer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Obama Exposer

My understanding is that this isn’t about his citizenship or his birth certificate, but about whether he meets the definition of “natural born citizen’.
No?


2 posted on 01/25/2012 2:44:14 PM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

Leave obama off the ballot. It’s no big deal.


3 posted on 01/25/2012 2:44:23 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

Motion for Contempt of Court Approved.

Send the Marshalls to arrest and detain the defendant.


4 posted on 01/25/2012 2:44:40 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

Now that you mention it, it certainly shows a great deal of contempt for the judge in question.

I presume they calculate that a decision keeping Obama off the ballot in Georgia may be the best outcome, since he stands no chance of winning there anyway. And now he can accuse the judge of being a nutty birther, as a way of explaining what happened.

I’m sure the press, the “conservative” Pundits, the RINOs, and Fox News will all agree.

Least damaging outcome? Better than sending in his lawyer and watching him lose.


5 posted on 01/25/2012 2:45:04 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer
"This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings. At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia - that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process"

Oh I see... so now we don't need to actually have the court decide the facts, we can decide for ourselves and mail them to the Judge?

Neato...

6 posted on 01/25/2012 2:46:54 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

Default judgment for plaintiffs?


7 posted on 01/25/2012 2:47:32 PM PST by wvguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

This follows the usual Obama pattern ..... the law means nothing to him and as Emperor, he’s above it all.


9 posted on 01/25/2012 2:49:08 PM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

I think Obama is doing this in order to draw attention to this political whack-a-mole game. Earlier, the only republican he could attract to make noise over the issue was Donald Trump. Now he’s hoping one of the 4 remaining candidates will try to make political hay out of this.

After all, that forgery cost him a bundle. He better get something out of it other than Donald Trump doing the Rosanna Rosannadanna impersonation of “never mind”.


10 posted on 01/25/2012 2:49:14 PM PST by Kevmo (If you can define a man by the depravity of his enemies, Rick Santorum must be a noble soul indeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

Just remove him from the ballot!


13 posted on 01/25/2012 2:50:38 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

Isn’t that contempt?


16 posted on 01/25/2012 2:51:18 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

The dirty-rotten-commie-dual-citizen pig and his dirty-rotten, lying lawyer!

They spit on our Constitution, rule of law and the limits placed on the Executive Branch.

I could puke.


17 posted on 01/25/2012 2:52:06 PM PST by WXRGina (Further up and further in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

I love the whiny cry-baby voice you read throughout this letter.

.... on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless...

...For these reasons, and as discussed briefly below, you should bring an end to this baseless, costly and unproductive hearing by withdrawing the original hearing request as improvidently issued....

...As a national leader in the so-called ‘birther movement...

We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.

(in other words - we have been down this road a 1000 times.)


19 posted on 01/25/2012 2:52:38 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

Since my eyes start to cross when I read “legalese” my take is that Obama’s Attorney is saying: You got NO STANDING, (NEENER-NEENER).

With that being said it’s pretty obvious that they are pretty contemptuous toward this judge.


20 posted on 01/25/2012 2:53:20 PM PST by The Working Man (The mantra for BO's reign...."No Child Left a Dime")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide. These people cannot prove Obama is eligible for office in a court of law. All they can do is hide behind procedural hurdles. When does America wake up and realize that it’s being duped by a fraud??


22 posted on 01/25/2012 2:55:08 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer
Isn't failure to appear without explanation grounds for a summary judgment against the absent party? The judge should rule against Obama and disbar Obama’s lawyer for what is clearly unethical behavior. The attorney refused to even make an appearance and then went to the Secretary of State without court authorization. This should result in a hefty fine and disbarment proceedings.
23 posted on 01/25/2012 2:55:52 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

the Honorable Judge Michael Malihi

Malihi - has kind of a Hawaiian ring to it.

Wonder if he knows what we know and maybe a bit more ?


25 posted on 01/25/2012 2:57:09 PM PST by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer
At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia - that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process.

WRONG! No hearing has, to my knowledge, been held on the merits of the complaints. Rather, all the cases until now have been dismissed on procedural grounds for lack of standing.

28 posted on 01/25/2012 2:58:37 PM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

I know you are new and learning but do you have a link, please?


29 posted on 01/25/2012 2:59:29 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

LoL. Those Foggy-OBots were saying for the last weeks that Obama and Joblinski would show up with Obama’s Crayola Crayon abstract birth certificate. Could it be as fake as OBama? Of course it is. Instead, the OBums withdrawal crying and whining at the court. Ha.

Go play more 18 hole golf Obama.


30 posted on 01/25/2012 3:00:01 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Obama Exposer

Oh gee...I’m shocked! Breaking news /sarc


31 posted on 01/25/2012 3:00:29 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson