Look, I like Ann Coulter, but....she is dead wrong on this one!!! Mitt Romney had two debates in South Carolina to directly address both the Bain Capital issue & the Income Tax form release time & substance!!! IMHO, Mitt Romney addressed both in timid, meek, weak, ineffective response!!! I got so angry, because all I could think of was whimp, John McCain back in 2008 telling us what a good and decent man POTUS Barack Hussein Obama was and is!!! McCain stood by while Obama destroyed him for his weakness!!!
If Romney wants in this race, he best get his act together, tell like it is, and...start getting fire in his belly, by ripping the political heart out of POTUS Obama and his un-American Democrat party!!! the sooner romney realizes that Obama is out to destroy America, the better off he will be!!! Americans want a fighter for them and a strong, gutsy leader to oust this America destroyer Obama and hois evil ilk!!
Now, Mitt, if you can’t handle fighting for the life and future of this USA with your heart, soul, and...with every available political weapon at hand, then I suggest you withdraw from the race and join whimp John McCain is his continuing adoration of POTUS, Barack Hussein “Muslim Brotherhood Lover” Obama!!!
I saw it, too. She also said that the SC Tea Party apparently requires nothing more than someone calling Obama a bunch of names. Isn’t that what her books consist of?
I think what we are looking at is another Sharon Angle situation with Newt and you know how that turned out.
I agree with point #2. His failed marriages are going to be a problem. I don’t see moderate women jumping on the the bandwagon for a man that has had 2 affairs (and they sure aren’t going to like “the other woman”, Calisa).You can bet the media will be playing up what a wonderful family man Obama is. If Newt were running against Bill Clinton it probably would not have mattered (although it may have been like that sexual harrassment skit on SNL with Tom Brady where the women didn’t considerate it sexual harrassment when Tom did it but did when it was by a less attractive man).
Probably don’t need that Barf Alert......
Just sayin’
Hanging around with gay or married men is attractive to women who have trouble with commitment because they still gain the attention of men (which they are genetically programmed to seek) without the danger of a long-term sexual or emotional relationship.
The problem with this is that it is impossible to remain neutral when it comes to a destructive lifestyle. Take, for example, a friend who might have a drinking problem. This person might be an otherwise wonderful human being, who just has a problem with his/her drinking. But, if you are around this person long enough, a decent and rational person has no choice but to notice the destructive nature of your friend's behavior. You either then have to confront the friend, or change your own morality and values. If you choose to confront, you will most likely lose the friend. If not, then you will increasingly be dragged into more and more uncomfortable situations (for you), until you have to break off the relationship. Or, you can change your mind, and salvage your friendship ("Oh, that's just the way he is. There's nothing wrong with it... it's him."). This is why peer pressure is so powerful.
So let's take a hypothetical. You have gay friends, and you are struggling with your moral doubts about their lifestyle. Then you get put in a situation where you have to either compromise your morals and go along to keep your friends ("Hey, Ann, go over there and tell that guy I think he's cute."), or take a stand and lose everything. The easier path is to just tell yourself that your friend is a good person (which he may be in every other respect), and that his behavior is just the way he is. And now you are a "live-and-let-live" gay rights supporter.
So, having come to her stealth morality change, who would Ann support? Not Santorum (for obvious reasons)! And Newt, as randy as his past life has been, is firmly hetero... with a social philosophy to match. But we all know Romney is just giving lip service to "conservative values" (so much so that your "friend" Drudge is fully on his bandwagon). Well, Romney it is...
Just my guess... but I'd be surprised if that wasn't part of it...
Not that it will stop her, but someone should tell Ann that Peggy Noonan already has the job she's trying out for and is better at it.
The spindly spinster was all a twitter with drivelous chatter. Her skirt was severely short for a woman her age. Her knees protruded through her hose disrupting the blackness sight line destroyer.
Perhaps like Mary Matlin she’ll capture a poisonous lefty. a boston Dandy is in her future no doubt
Ann, I put you in the same class as Piggy Noonan. I once agreed with you, admired you and now both of you can blow it where the sun don’t shine. You’ve sold out to the highest bidder and now nothing you say is anything I’m interested in hearing. Newt isn’t Conservative???.....but Mittens and Christie ARE??? Give me a break!!
Ann Coulter has been a consistent, dedicated warrior for the conservative cause. She is wrong about Romney, IMHO, but all this Ann-hate on FR is uncalled for. Just agree to disagree with her and leave the personal attacks for sites like DU.
Note to Ann:
Mormons rarely take on mistresses.
Find someone else to fall in love with from afar.
RomneyCare. End of story.
It looks like Coulter is coming out with a new book, “How to Talk to a CONSERVATIVE (If You Must)”.
To think I used to respect that harpy. I/we didn’t change. It did.
Ann Coulter has morphed into a blonde anorexic version of Peggy Noonan and both of them would be delighted if they had been born with the name ‘Megan Marshack’.
Peggy Noonan = Was always a RINO.
Ann Coulter = Went over to the dark side, now a Romney-RINO.
All the good that Ann has done with her prior exemplary writing is being undone by her insane flight from reality in backing Mitt-Witt.
cue Yoda: “a sad little thing, Coulter is”
Ann is the Lee Corso (College Gameday) of elections. Not so fast...
Ann Coulter was a hero here for years. Now she's the object ugly ad hominems because she opposes Newt.
I don't think Newt can attract Reagan Democrats, independents, young people, or women. I want to Republicans to win. I guess that makes me a horrible person, too.
I’m a Phil Gramm Republican. I’ve been a Freeper since 2000. I’m not the establishment.
Although I have reservations about Romney, I think Gingrich isn’t the right candidate.
He disappoints me on so many levels. The criticisms of him are valid.
I’m not so worked up about the yellowstream media, that in an effort to put an overdue thumb in their eye, I support a guy who’s randomness is a showstopper for most voters. He’s NOT a Reaganesque happy warrior. He can’t make the jump. If you remove “fundamentally”, “systemic”, “profound” and “transformational”, he loses his debate edge.
And the #1 reason I can’t handle him is his attacks on capitalism. I though we wiped our feet of Huey Long style economics in the Republican party when that clown Buchannen left!
I need to see Obama defeated. Mitt is better than GW or W on most issues. Is he Reagan? No. Is he better than Newt? Absolutely.
Alzheimers?