[Rate_Determining_Step]

I’m a Phil Gramm Republican. I’ve been a Freeper since 2000. I’m not the establishment.

Although I have reservations about Romney, I think Gingrich isn’t the right candidate.

He disappoints me on so many levels. The criticisms of him are valid.

I’m not so worked up about the yellowstream media, that in an effort to put an overdue thumb in their eye, I support a guy who’s randomness is a showstopper for most voters. He’s NOT a Reaganesque happy warrior. He can’t make the jump. If you remove “fundamentally”, “systemic”, “profound” and “transformational”, he loses his debate edge.

And the #1 reason I can’t handle him is his attacks on capitalism. I though we wiped our feet of Huey Long style economics in the Republican party when that clown Buchannen left!

I need to see Obama defeated. Mitt is better than GW or W on most issues. Is he Reagan? No. Is he better than Newt? Absolutely.

[Just mythoughts]

Would you call this

http://thehill.com/video/campaign/203497-romney-likens-work-at-bain-to-obamas-auto-industry-bailout

the proper defense of capitalism????????

[SupplySider]

Excellent post, because I agree 100% with everything you typed. :)

Glad to see the great Phil Gramm's name mentioned, too. Without him we'd now be living under Hillarycare.