Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bluecat6

It is a reasonable theory but I think it is likely contradicted by the Hawaiian state “stamp” on it. The stamp says “abstract.” If Obama’s team of idiots were forging it, they would likely have omitted that word and used the same language which was on the known documents from the 1960s. (I no longer recall exactly what it was, but I think it was a “true and correct copy of the record on file” or some such.)

No, I think the word “abstract” is legal weedeling on the part of Hawaii. It allows them to produce something which is misleading, but protects them from any consequences if it should be discovered to not be true.

It is that stamp and access to similar birth documents which convinces me it was created by DOH Hawaii.


106 posted on 01/19/2012 2:38:01 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

The old, old certified copies said ‘true copy of the record on file’. The newer ones say ‘abstract or true copy of the record on file’. The ‘abstract’ was probably added to cover the infamous COLBs, which are abstracts only and not a ‘true copy’.

The image in that god awful pdf is meant to be a ‘true copy’ since it has hand writting and written signatures. If someone really tries to claim it was ‘created’ from other documents to assemble the legal ‘abstract’ the would be a difficult argument.

Another useful purpose of abstract COLBs is for the legally adopted or those that have legally changed their identity. The COLB allows them to have a valid document from the state without a legally created ‘fake’ BC to make their adopted name or new identity. But look at the possibilty of mis-use of such a document. In fact the original COLB (that was also a fake - but a pretty good one) was attempt to do just that.

Obama’s buddy since the early 1980s was Bill Ayers. Ayers was (is?) a master at forged identities. The original COLB forgery was decent stuff but the LFBC was an statement of

‘Catch me if you can’.


124 posted on 01/19/2012 5:42:13 PM PST by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp
"It is that stamp and access to similar birth documents which convinces me it was created by DOH Hawaii."

Intriguing theory. Isn't the :) in the Alvin Onaka part of the stamp at the very least an an element of an over-the-top eff-u document by a taxpayer-funded (presuming the DOH creation involvement) department? Additionally, the "x" being in place of the "h" in the word "The" of that "stamp" is highly suspect, as far as the "stamp" on a pdf goes. Setting those aside, as my Japanese friends are wont to say, "Lazed Seeru, wa?"

140 posted on 01/20/2012 1:53:12 AM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome ("Obama" Eligibility: Don't let 'em (continue to) get away with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson