Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek
They could compare green energy scams. Newt’s is bigger and “better”.

What, exactly, is Newt's "green energy scam"?

I heard him recently say that the science on global warming is not settled, and that therefore there is no reason to spend trillions of dollars to try and fight it.

Do you disagree with that?

He made that commercial with Nancy Pelosi in 2008 before Climategate I. He has said that he regrets doing that, and in the ensuing years there has been ample evidence that the whole AGW argument is bogus.

Do you really think President Newt will jump on the global warming train? Really?

I don't.

24 posted on 01/17/2012 2:30:54 PM PST by Maceman (Obama: As American as nasei goreng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Maceman
Do you really think President Newt will jump on the global warming train? Really?

He's already on it and you would see it if you had the courage to look rather than believing what you want to believe. At the first Huckabee forum he said he would eliminate the EPA and replace it with an "Environmental Solutions Agency". And while you were deliberately looking away he expanded on the idea and has said he would give incentives for buying flex fuel vehicles and "incentivize" energy.

Gingrich’s list of energy policies includes providing incentives for flex fuel vehicles that can use corn-based ethanol rather than gasoline — a key issue for Iowa’s farm economy.

Newt Gingrich proposes abolishing EPA (January 2011)

Gingrich "claims" he opposed cap and trade but he seemed to like the idea when he did an 07 Frontline interview.

Asked if he supported George W. Bush’s campaign pledge in 2000 to set mandatory carbon caps, Gingrich responded:

"I think if you have mandatory carbon caps combined with a trading system, much like we did with sulfur, and if you have a tax-incentive program for investing in the solutions, that there's a package there that's very, very good. And frankly, it's something I would strongly support." he said.

He then went on to criticize Bush for backing off the pledge.

"If he had instituted a regime that combined three things I just said -- mandatory caps, a trading system inside the caps, as we have with clean air, and a tax incentive to be able to invest in the new technology and to be able to produce the new technology -- I think we would be much better off than we are in the current situation," Gingrich said.


Newt Gingrich claims he 'never favored cap and trade'
30 posted on 01/17/2012 2:51:27 PM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson