Replies

This is a liberty taking bad law. It forces a person to have a medical procedure done. Where would you want to stop this? What is the next medical procedure a state forces you to have?

Oh please, don't you have some other NARAL "Champions of Choice" talking points to toss out at us?

It doesn't "force" a woman to do a damn thing, it DOES make the abortion procedure (which is entirely elective and voluntary) subject to including a sonogram so the woman can see exactly what is going on in the womb, and gets a clear picture of the life she's about to snuff out. Tell me how that could POSSIBLY be a "bad law"?

However many unborn children who were aborted from the point of the Texas injunction up to today when that injunction was overturned by the Fifth circuit, their blood is on the hands of that Texas judge.

It requires a person to have a medical procedure, therfore, it does force that person to have that procedure. Forcing a person to have a medical procedure goes beyond the abortion question. This law doesn’t affect you so it’s okay with you for the state to require someone else to have a medical procedure. When the state requires YOU to have “x” medical procedure, your opinion will change.

Personal liberty can be taken away by Democrats or Republicans. I do not want the state of Texas or the US government to force me to have “x” medical procedure done, neither do I want them to refuse to give me “x” medical procedure if my doctor says it is necessary.

I am pro life and always have been - that is not the issue. This law begins a slippery slope to take away your liberty relating to your medical decisions.