Posted on 01/07/2012 1:21:48 PM PST by katiedidit1
GOP New Hampshire primary debate tonight on ABC at 9pm ET
By Nate, on January 7th, 2012
Tonight will mark the first of two debates this weekend focused on the New Hampshire Republican primary. This evening's debate will take place at Saint Anselm College and is sponsored by ABC News, Yahoo! and WMUR. Sunday morning will feature a GOP debate broadcast on NBC at 9am ET (yes, am) but look for more details on that later today.
Air Time: Saturday, January 7th at 9pm ET / 6pm PT on ABC
Live Stream: WMUR and Yahoo! News
Participants: Santorum, Romney, Paul, Perry, Gingrich, Huntsman
Report from WMUR:
(Excerpt) Read more at 2012presidentialelectionnews.com ...
Newt does appear to be the only one who can systematically take it to Zero and his regimes pathetic policies. He does not mince words.
No one wanted to have to go there in the first place, but we do what we have to. Strategically, that was a good place to be.
Huntsman=Barney Fife
I'm sorry about comparing Santorum to Ambien, he is definitely ten dollar bag of heroin territory.
Dianne Sawyer is a LUSH!!
If Newt were elected President, he will tone down his demonization of the Saudis in a NY minute. Anyone who understands the region and the impact of oil on the global ecnomomy would never make such statements. And the Saudis have been very helpful to us is many ways that the public is not aware of.
Just sent another $300 ! to NEWT
Put an Norwegian Blue next to Newt in a debate and it would do very well too.
Remarkable bird, the Norwegian Blue, idn'it, ay?
:/
Tonight? Those three are ALWAYS boring
Bigtime.
What’s up with that? ? /s
Just what I was thinking about Newt.
He should insist on debates every other night.
He comes across as sharp and quick witted on debates, ...
but ... let’s face it, he’s not as good in ‘real life.’
He can’t whip up a crowd and he’s not that personally likeable.
As soon as the tv goes off on the debate, the doubts start creeping back in.
But, he’s still my second choice.
Right on.
Honestly, I’d be really leery of a leader who didn’t have a temper.
Anger doesn’t necessarily mean imply loss of control or reckless irrationality—it can be a source of clarity. Too many get brought up to see anger something ‘low’ or ‘scary’. But, there’s a time and a place for channeled anger, and this is certainly one of them.
“Santorum doesn’t know how to convey a message. He rambles too much.”
Unlike the others, he’s not been in the limelight before now, and not had to worry about articulating much of a message until now. That’s something he’ll need to work on, for sure.
right..David and Bathsheba. There are so many biblical stories of Gods chosen and they were not sinless. Newt has atoned and confessed publicly. It is between him and God. I know that Newt would make a fantastic president. The short air time he is given in debates just boggles the mind. He is right on and our nation needs him.
Why not ask a question like, “The u.s. Senate hasn’t passed a budget in almost 3 years. What will you do to get this disfunctional DEmocrat led insti,tut ions to get to work for the American public?
how bout THAT question,ABC?
If you were taking a drink every time someone took a shot at Willard Romney tonight, you’d be cold sober right now.
What is most wrong is that they're not giving him but few chances to use the mike.
I could never quite put my finger on why I don't care for him and you nailed it for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.