Skip to comments.
GOP New Hampshire Primary debate tonight on ABC at 9 PM et [LIVE THREAD]
2012 Election Central ^
| 01/07/2012
| Nate
Posted on 01/07/2012 1:21:48 PM PST by katiedidit1
GOP New Hampshire primary debate tonight on ABC at 9pm ET
By Nate, on January 7th, 2012
Tonight will mark the first of two debates this weekend focused on the New Hampshire Republican primary. This evening's debate will take place at Saint Anselm College and is sponsored by ABC News, Yahoo! and WMUR. Sunday morning will feature a GOP debate broadcast on NBC at 9am ET (yes, am) but look for more details on that later today.
Air Time: Saturday, January 7th at 9pm ET / 6pm PT on ABC
Live Stream: WMUR and Yahoo! News
Participants: Santorum, Romney, Paul, Perry, Gingrich, Huntsman
Report from WMUR:
(Excerpt) Read more at 2012presidentialelectionnews.com ...
TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: 2ndammendment; 4th; 85000000progunvotes; abc4liarromney; abcflacksmitt; abcpimpsromney; abcprrep; alotsantorumspending; anger; antigunvotes1996; banglist; contractwiththeearth; controversyloses; diamondsareforever; elections; florida; focusoneconomyorlose; freddienewt; gingrich; globalwarming; goa; gunfreezonevote; gunownersofamerica; gunrights; honesty; iowa; livegopdebate; livenhgopdebate; missouri; mrsolutionshohum; newhampshire; newt; newt1996lautenberg; newt2012; newtlautenberg; nhgopdebate; perry; porkbarrelsantorum; reasonableguncontrol; santorum; santuckabee; sofa; southcarolina; spendtorum; talkischeap; toolazytogetonballot; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840, 841-860, 861-880 ... 1,781-1,798 next last
To: Rome2000
Gingrich, in spite of the animus of the three degenerate asshole moderators and Romney/Paul, has DEMONSTRATED why he will be the next POTUS. Winston Churchill was not a handsome or imposing man. He was very difficult to put up with.. arrogant, drunken, slovenly, a bully at times, either depressed or wildly ecstatic, rude to employees, in short, he was often insufferable.
But his saving grace, that which allowed him to achieve and wield great power for good was his intelligence and his gift of oratory. When the man spoke the earth seemed to tremble.
Newt reminds me of Churchill for many of the same reasons.
Remember that in spite of Churchills flaws he was the one man able to rally a nation against incredible odds in a war that most thought was a lost cause. Where would the world be now if not for that flawed man?
I support Newt! Not in spite of his flaws but in fact because of them. We need someone with the will to fight. I believe Newt is the right man at the right time.... if not Newt then just who has both the intellect and will to accomplish the impossible and place this nation on a road to moral and economic recovery?
If Newt does not get the nomination and win the election then we will all soon or late come to wish for what might have been.
841
posted on
01/07/2012 7:18:50 PM PST
by
Bobalu
(We cannot afford to bring Mittens to a Newt-fight.)
To: onyx
Newt’s ability to reason makes him stand out like a mature man among teen age boys.
To: TexasFreeper2009
Santorums has always been disappointing...
LOL. Yeah right. I guess he should sleep around on his wife more.
843
posted on
01/07/2012 7:19:06 PM PST
by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: imchris
I rank it this way for now
Newt
Santorum-Perry (tie)
Romney-Huntsman (tie)
Paul stilling running for the presidency of Iran
844
posted on
01/07/2012 7:19:18 PM PST
by
Reily
To: Reagan69
Santorum giving Ron Paul more attention than he needs to. I think he’s still pissed about Paul’s attacks on him early in the debate. It would be a better strategy to just ignore him.
To: TexasFreeper2009
Perry is right about sending some troops back into Iraq with the approval of the Iraqis. We have thousands of US government contractors providing force protection for our Embassy, consulates, civilian reconstuction teams, rand NGOs. They are heavily armed and have their own air force. The State Department is running it.
The reason why we don't have any US military forces there now is that we could not reach a status of forces agreement with the Iraqis. I bet it was for lack of trying. Obama wants to bug out for political reasons, i.e., his reelection. It has nothing to do with long term US interests.
846
posted on
01/07/2012 7:19:18 PM PST
by
kabar
To: onyx
Like the way Santorum just took down the *Crazy Old Coot* and OBummer on Iran.......Excellent.
847
posted on
01/07/2012 7:19:32 PM PST
by
The Cajun
(Palin, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
To: Recovering_Democrat
Santorum kicking Paul upside the head regarding Iran and foreign policy.
848
posted on
01/07/2012 7:19:44 PM PST
by
RasterMaster
("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
To: RitaOK
“NEWT WINS THE DAY” Agreed, even considering the fact that this debate was rigged to keep him out.
Everyone else was simply yakking and rambling without critical thought or basis of knowledge.
849
posted on
01/07/2012 7:19:44 PM PST
by
Gator113
(~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO.....!)
To: lahargis
We were fighting the wrong enemy all along. Now is not the time to go back and make up for that mistake with more American lives. The real fight is right around the corner, want it or not.
850
posted on
01/07/2012 7:19:44 PM PST
by
Vermont Lt
(I just don't like anything about the President. And I don't think he's a nice guy.)
To: Reddy
Santorum With your policy, RP, we wouldnt even have troops there to pick up the Iranian fishermen!Yay!!
Amen to that, Rick!
851
posted on
01/07/2012 7:20:00 PM PST
by
nutmeg
To: FRiends; FReepers
TIME OUT FOR A SPECIAL MESSAGE!
852
posted on
01/07/2012 7:20:00 PM PST
by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
To: Girlene
And ABC thought that question about contraception was so important that they want to show it AGAIN on their “Rewind”.
To: llandres
The libs are trying to cause more vote spread to get Mitt in.
Period. I hope Conservatives Pay attention to this attempt!
854
posted on
01/07/2012 7:20:05 PM PST
by
ConfidentConservative
(If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
855
posted on
01/07/2012 7:20:12 PM PST
by
llandres
(Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
To: Girlene
Santorum takes it to Obama and his lack of leadership, Chicago Politician.
To: Reagan69
And he isnt even getting hit.
This is his high game.
857
posted on
01/07/2012 7:20:12 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Vermont Lt
Amusing. Will have to sleep on that one.
858
posted on
01/07/2012 7:20:12 PM PST
by
going hot
(Happiness is a momma deuce)
To: Girlene
Perry thinks we should send troops back into Iraq because of Iran
Newt says if yourre trying to keep Iran out of Iraq, come up with a plan to oust the current leadership in Iran.
Newt says we need to develop an energy strategy so no American president ever again bows to a Saudi King. WOWSA!M
Newt definitely had the better idea. Until we deal with the Iranian leadership, we'll always have problems with Iran.
To: Pravious
Can Ron Paul say ANYTHING without whining?
No. I'm not watching the video much, so when I hear him speak, I imagine him wearing a chiffon scarf and a dress. I swear he sounds like a bitter old woman. How does his wife stand him???!!!
860
posted on
01/07/2012 7:20:18 PM PST
by
Girlene
(Let's get ready to rumble)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840, 841-860, 861-880 ... 1,781-1,798 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson