Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I will support Santorum if he wins the nomination, however, he has to stop doubling down on 'big govt is good' and he is proud of his earmarks.
1 posted on 01/06/2012 10:00:52 AM PST by Fred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Fred

The list at the link is informative.


2 posted on 01/06/2012 10:03:24 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Santorum will be a total train wreck if he becomes the nominee. He will be slaughtered by the left on social issues (say goodbye to any of the youth vote), and he will turn off the limited gov’t tea party types like myself.


3 posted on 01/06/2012 10:03:51 AM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Erickson lost all credibility when he started attacking Sarah Palin and pimping Mitch Daniels. He can take his RINO red website and go away.


4 posted on 01/06/2012 10:03:59 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

I’m okay with Santorum as VP, but I want to make sure he’s matured and grown out of his love affair with big government-ordained social collectivism before he becomes president.


5 posted on 01/06/2012 10:04:10 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Immigration:

Voted against increasing the number of immigration investigators

Voted to allow illegal immigrants to receive the earned income credit before becoming citizens

Voted to give SSI benefits to legal aliens.

Voted to give welfare benefits to naturalized citizens without regard to to the earnings of their sponsors.

Voted against hiring an additional 1,000 border partrol agents, paid for by reductions in state grants.

___________________________

I can imagine what would be said against any of the other candidates if they had this voting record.


7 posted on 01/06/2012 10:07:04 AM PST by LimberJim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Wow, Erickson put my list on Santorum to shame. Good job.


9 posted on 01/06/2012 10:11:11 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred
What a load of crap. Everyday on CNN Erickson trashes Republicans with whatever lands in his "in box" from Media Matters.

Santorum wants the government to do what the Constitution and Declaration of Independence dictates it do, defending "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".

12 posted on 01/06/2012 10:17:14 AM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Whatever. I take no political input from a Paul-tard.


13 posted on 01/06/2012 10:17:18 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Seems like Erick Erickson wants Romney to win, because other than Perry all he does is tear down the other conservatives- sure they aren’t perfect, but they’re darned better than Romney. Maybe he should spend more time attacking Romney’s record (truthfull) than being a pessimistic party pooper! I am really disliking this strategy of tear the current non-Romney down untill they sink to the point that Romney SUCCEEDS (all the while ingnoring Romney’s glaring RECORD)!?

Can we all AGREE to just attack Romney (on his truthful liberal record, and not or “not-perfect” conservative)?? We are running out of time-unless YOU LIKE Obama Presidentcy, or a Romney (George W. McCain/Kerry) administration??

In fact I think that IS Romney’s strategy- send out bloggers into the conservative blogosphere to tear down the current “surging” conservative; so that he can slide by clean as glass?..


14 posted on 01/06/2012 10:20:37 AM PST by JSDude1 (https://transaxt.com/Donate/PTWALC/RickSantorumforPresident)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred; Jim Robinson

Seems like Erick Erickson wants Romney to win, because other than Perry all he does is tear down the other conservatives- sure they aren’t perfect, but they’re darned better than Romney. Maybe he should spend more time attacking Romney’s record (truthfull) than being a pessimistic party pooper! I am really disliking this strategy of tear the current non-Romney down untill they sink to the point that Romney SUCCEEDS (all the while ingnoring Romney’s glaring RECORD)!?

Can we all AGREE to just attack Romney (on his truthful liberal record, and not or “not-perfect” conservative)?? We are running out of time-unless YOU LIKE Obama Presidentcy, or a Romney (George W. McCain/Kerry) administration??

In fact I think that IS Romney’s strategy- send out bloggers into the conservative blogosphere to tear down the current “surging” conservative; so that he can slide by clean as glass?..


15 posted on 01/06/2012 10:21:51 AM PST by JSDude1 (https://transaxt.com/Donate/PTWALC/RickSantorumforPresident)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred
LOL, do you have a list of the shrimp kings ear marks, and the king of ear markers noot.
18 posted on 01/06/2012 10:24:04 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Actually this is more monkey poo from the red state jokers.


19 posted on 01/06/2012 10:25:36 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Which candidate two days ago said that he was the man with BIG IDEAS and BIG SOLUTIONS? Sounds like BIG GUBMINT to me.

LLS


24 posted on 01/06/2012 10:33:36 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (ONWARD CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Seems to me Jim has spoken about attacking conservative Republican candidates, and made it clear that WE SHOULD NOT BE DOING THIS, especially at this point in the primaries.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2829090/posts


27 posted on 01/06/2012 10:39:51 AM PST by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

I thought that question was settled. We WILL be getting a big state big spender for a candidate because that is what the “adults” are prepared to present us with.


35 posted on 01/06/2012 10:47:53 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Rick Santorum is a social conservative. He is not a fiscal conservative, and this nation is in a full-on plunge into fiscal disaster. I want a nominee whose candidacy and message are about the economy and the need to shrink the federal government - why is this not possible?


56 posted on 01/06/2012 11:45:07 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred
In fact, he has been complicit in the expansion of the welfare state.

He left of the /s.

58 posted on 01/06/2012 11:52:58 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Erick Erickson is reminding me of how glad I am to be a regular at Free Republic and one who has never posted at Red State


60 posted on 01/06/2012 12:03:03 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Arrrgh. I’m having second thoughts about Santorum.


93 posted on 01/06/2012 8:17:03 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

This election will be a challenge to defeat the entitlement class, unions, tree huggin liberals, socialists, muslims, and marxists. But in the process of choosing the best candidate to defeat them, and the odds are against us, we should not accept another big govt rino socialist.

Sadly, from the looks of things, we are headed down that road, yet again.


100 posted on 01/06/2012 11:47:28 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Constitutional Conservatism is Americanism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson