Skip to comments.
8 votes: but Romney spent $1.47 million compared to Santorum’s $22,000
LifeSiteNews ^
| January 4, 2012
| Kathleen Gilbert
Posted on 01/04/2012 10:50:38 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Wow! Team Romney probably spent more than $22,000 on pizza!
To: 2ndDivisionVet
anyone who thinks ricky only spent 22,000 is silly...one commercial would be more than that
2
posted on
01/04/2012 10:53:04 PM PST
by
skaterboy
(Hate=Love....Love=Hate)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
We sent Santorum a check today.
3
posted on
01/04/2012 10:53:15 PM PST
by
SoDak
To: skaterboy
4
posted on
01/04/2012 10:54:32 PM PST
by
SoDak
To: 2ndDivisionVet
>> 30,007 to 30,015
In reality, that could be as few as 4 votes.
5
posted on
01/04/2012 10:56:37 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(C'mon, Virginia -- are you with us or against us?!)
To: Gene Eric
I think a more troubling sign for Romney is that he got virtually the same amount and percentage of votes as the last time he ran, only with much weaker competition.
6
posted on
01/04/2012 10:59:17 PM PST
by
OddLane
(If Lionel Hutz and Guy Smiley had a lovechild together, his name would be "Mitt Romney." -KAJ)
Won’t Mitten’s Cult wonder where their donation is after that outlandish display of cash?
7
posted on
01/04/2012 11:01:32 PM PST
by
NoRedTape
To: OddLane
Exactly. That pony couldn’t pull away.
8
posted on
01/04/2012 11:01:42 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(C'mon, Virginia -- are you with us or against us?!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
NEWTORUM!! Willard won't know what hit him by the end of this month --- the Massachusetts liberal is simply not viable if he loses SC & FL. You just don't ever win the nom if you lose those two states.
9
posted on
01/04/2012 11:22:14 PM PST
by
CainConservative
( Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Santorum played superb MoneyBall.
10
posted on
01/04/2012 11:35:14 PM PST
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Ron Paul said that he was not disappointed with the outcome, pointing out his popularity with both young and independent voters.”
Pamela Geller had last night, at her site Atlas Shrugged, very interesting numbers concerning Democrats who voted for Ron Paul in Iowa. Somewhere in the 30% of his final votes were from acknowledged Democrats.
I doubt Newt Gringrich would have done so badly if the Democrats had stayed home.
11
posted on
01/04/2012 11:35:15 PM PST
by
SatinDoll
(NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Romney spent $1.47 million compared to Santorums $22,000 Romney's PAC prolly spent another 2 million so figure that in
12
posted on
01/04/2012 11:42:06 PM PST
by
dennisw
(A nation of sheep breeds a government of Democrat wolves!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
A sizable portion of that $22K went towards gasoline for the minivan he uses to travel from county to county. He probably even sleeps in the thing and takes showers at truck stops. This is the guy I want running our own federal budget. Think of how much money will be left over at the end of each fiscal year.
13
posted on
01/04/2012 11:50:27 PM PST
by
Hoodat
(Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
And Romney also got 6 fewer votes than he did in 2008.
To: SatinDoll
I doubt Newt Gringrich would have done so badly if the Democrats had stayed home.That is preposterous. If those 7,865 Paul voters who were Democrats would have stayed home, then the results would have been:
Santorum - 26.2%
Romney - 26.2%
Paul - 16.0%
Gingrich - 14.2%
Perry - 11.0%
Gingrich would have gained less than a percentage point, and he still would have trailed the Conservative candidate by 12.0 percentage points instead of 11.2.
15
posted on
01/05/2012 12:09:44 AM PST
by
Hoodat
(Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
To: Paleo Conservative
And Romney also got 6 fewer votes than he did in 2008.Don't tell the Newtbots. Their only remaining campaign strategy is to scare Republicans into believing that unless they vote for Newt, Romney will win.
16
posted on
01/05/2012 12:12:28 AM PST
by
Hoodat
(Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ron Paul is not a social conservative..........
8:}
17
posted on
01/05/2012 12:22:17 AM PST
by
AwesomePossum
(I have never looked this forward to a November II........)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Journolists , the most of them, seem to ignore cost-effectiveness
18
posted on
01/05/2012 12:23:17 AM PST
by
Ulysse
(a)
To: skaterboy
anyone who thinks ricky only spent 22,000 is silly...one commercial would be more than that Independent expenditures.
If I'm a billionaire, and I like Santorum, I can buy a boatload of commercials praising him and damning his opponents, and Ricky hasn't spent a dime (it would be illegal otherwise can't even talk about it on the phone).
That's the First Amendment. Don't like it, move to China you aren't American.
19
posted on
01/05/2012 12:26:08 AM PST
by
cynwoody
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Let’s recall too that Santorum basically did nothing but campaign in Iowa, while Romney’s team spread nationwide. Unfortunately, I don’t think Santorum will have quite such a strong showing in any of the upcoming primaries.
20
posted on
01/05/2012 12:30:49 AM PST
by
Little Pig
(Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson