Skip to comments.
NH Primary Tracking Poll (Suffolk 1/4)
Suffolk University (pdf) ^
| 1/4/2012
| Suffolk University
Posted on 01/04/2012 11:47:07 AM PST by Crichton
Jan 2nd - Jan 3rd
Romney 43%
Undecided 16%
Paul 14%
Gingrich 9%
Huntsman 7%
Santorum 6%
Bachmann 2%
Perry 1%
Roemer 1%
Karger 1%
(Excerpt) Read more at suffolk.edu ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: 1percentperry; 2percentperry; larazarick; perry4amnesty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
This is the only up to date polling on NH. It is from pre-Iowa so expect some shake-up after those results.
1
posted on
01/04/2012 11:47:13 AM PST
by
Crichton
To: Crichton
If Santorum can make any kind of contest out of Iowa then Romney is in deep trouble.
This is the 4th day of tracking from Suffolk - the results have been more or less steady, slight downticks (2 pts) from Gingrich and Huntsman, uptick from 3 to 6 for Santorum.
3
posted on
01/04/2012 11:56:01 AM PST
by
Crichton
To: Crichton
OK, I’ll bite. What’s a Karger?
4
posted on
01/04/2012 11:58:58 AM PST
by
BigEdLB
(Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
To: Crichton
What a sorry state of affairs in NH.
5
posted on
01/04/2012 11:59:31 AM PST
by
bereanway
To: Crichton
Thanks for the new poll : )
Jan 2nd - Jan 3rd
Willard (D) 43%
Paul (D) 14%
Gingrich 9% .. Go Newt!!!
Huntsman 7%
Santorum 6% .. Go Rick!!!
Bachmann 2%
Roemer 1%
Karger 1%
PERRY 1% .. Yikes!!!
Undecided 16%
6
posted on
01/04/2012 12:03:06 PM PST
by
CainConservative
( Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
To: BigEdLB
Fred Karger .... I think he runs for president in the NH primary every cycle. Probably some good stories about him!
7
posted on
01/04/2012 12:03:23 PM PST
by
Crichton
To: Crichton
What importance is New Hampshire? Answer - 0!! New Hampshire has gone from a Conservative state to the mix we have today. The public up there are as screwed up as Massachusetts. And, Romney does well both places. Fortunately some of the rest of the country has some intelligent people that can determine what smell right or wrong. New Hampshire is now full of migrating liberals from Massachusetts's who voted high taxes, liberal pensions plans for public employees, in bed with corrupted unions and loved every welfare program devised. Why did they move to New Hampshire you ask??? In order to get away from the policies the espoused in Massachusetts, pinheads!!!
8
posted on
01/04/2012 12:03:40 PM PST
by
bramps
(zero from zero is zero)
To: freedomrings69
If Santorum can make any kind of contest out of Iowa then Romney is in deep trouble.
On the up side nobody expects anyone but Romney to win in NH. Santorum needs to come in 2nd with over 25% to make it interesting. If he is in the single digits he won't be able to build momentum in the South. Especially now that Perry has elected to stay in.
Newt can help him a lot if he savages Romney. If nothing else it will keep the Romney machine busy fighting Newt and off of Santorum. Best case it pulls Romney down into the 30s where Santorum or Gingrich might be able to get at him. Not likely to happen, unless Romney blows his cool under the assault.
9
posted on
01/04/2012 12:05:37 PM PST
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
I think Newt rebounds to double digits in NH.
And I think Santorum hits about 10% which will be pretty good for him, and Perry drops BELOW 1%.
10
posted on
01/04/2012 12:07:00 PM PST
by
CainConservative
( Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
To: bramps
Bingo! NH sucks almost as bad as MA now. Although NH does have NASCAR : )
11
posted on
01/04/2012 12:08:51 PM PST
by
CainConservative
( Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
To: freedomrings69
12
posted on
01/04/2012 12:09:48 PM PST
by
alloysteel
(Are Democrats truly "better angels"? They are lousy stewards for America.)
To: Crichton
Worst case scenario would be
Romney
Paul
Huntsman
Santorum
Gingrich
A 4th and 5th place showing for Santorum and Gingrich would be crippling to both. Gringrich would be seriously (irreparably ?) damaged especially given the huge endorsement by the NH paper.
This is setting up to be a wild political winter/ spring
To: GonzoGOP
I would guess Romney's support is pretty solid. The keys from my perspective:
* Will Romney finish under 50%, limiting his delegate share?
* Will Hunstman get any traction, or at least finish in the top 4 to remain eligible for the SC debate?
* Will Ron Paul see a surge? He could take 2nd.
* I doubt Santorum will hit 20% but how high will the bounce take him?
* Will Newt really compete in the state or throw in the towel and head to SC?
14
posted on
01/04/2012 12:13:17 PM PST
by
Crichton
To: Crichton
* Will Romney finish under 50%, limiting his delegate share
Likely. He isn't at 50% now and the one thing that we know for sure is that even if 16% are undecided they have decided one thing, and that is not to vote for Romney.
* Will Hunstman get any traction, or at least finish in the top 4 to remain eligible for the SC debate?
No. His dismal finish in Iowa and low numbers in the South mark him as an also ran.
* Will Ron Paul see a surge? He could take 2nd.
Santorum or Gingrich need 20% to keep Paul out of 2nd. He won't get much higher than he is now, but he isn't going any lower either.
* I doubt Santorum will hit 20% but how high will the bounce take him?
You never know. There are 16% undecided. Pick up that an you are at 22%. And you can pick up a percent or two of ex-Bachman voters. Not likely by any stretch of the imagination, but possible.
* Will Newt really compete in the state or throw in the towel and head to SC?
He will be there, but will be running a scorched earth campaign against Romney. While he may siphon off some of the "Not Romney" vote, he will at a minimum keep the Romney camp's attention. Allowing Santorum to retain a positive message.
15
posted on
01/04/2012 12:26:09 PM PST
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: trumandogz; Liz
HAHA! La Raza Rick at 1% with Karger and Roemer!
To: PAConservative1; miss marmelstein; TADSLOS; South40; rintense; fieldmarshaldj; CodeToad; ...
Perry was just on TV attributing his loss to Iowa’s “quirky” process——says he’s looking forward to state caucuses where “real” Republicans vote.
17
posted on
01/04/2012 3:07:02 PM PST
by
Liz
To: spetznaz
18
posted on
01/04/2012 3:17:58 PM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
Perry was just on TV attributing his loss to Iowas quirky processsays hes looking forward to state caucuses where real Republicans vote. Damn...talk like that might convince me to vote for him...
19
posted on
01/04/2012 3:20:53 PM PST
by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: Liz
You know who else is “quirky”? South Carolinians, Floridians, Virginians and Ohioans. Looks like Rick’s gotta lotta quirkiness to wade through.
20
posted on
01/04/2012 3:24:01 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
(It's time for Rick Perry to go home to Paint Creek.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson