Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Interested In Forming Anti-Romney Alliance With Santorum
RealClearPolitics ^ | January 4, 2012

Posted on 01/04/2012 8:32:50 AM PST by US Navy Vet

Laura Ingraham: "Can you see a scenario under which the two of you [Santorum and Gingrich] would align together to try to defeat the establishment candidate, Mitt Romney?"

Newt Gingrich: "Absolutely. Of course. I mean Rick and I have a 20-year friendship, we are both rebels, we both came into this business as reformers, we both dislike deeply the degree to which the establishment sells out the American people. We both think Washington has to be changed in very fundamental ways, and we have lots of things that fit together. And the thing that's interesting is if you take the votes, you add to that Perry and Bachmann, you begin to see the size of the conservative vote compared to Romney...if you take, you know, Santorum and Perry and Bachmann and Gingrich you get some sense of what a small minority Romney really represents."

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: elections; iowa; iowacaucusaftermath; newt; newtgingrich; ricksantorum; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
HUMMM...Very Interesting!
1 posted on 01/04/2012 8:32:56 AM PST by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

“...we are both rebels...”

I hope Newt doesn’t replay the ‘maverick’ theme.


2 posted on 01/04/2012 8:34:28 AM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Aha! I predicted this last night on the live thread after watching Newt praising Santorum and how pissed he was at Romney. It seemed the natural alliance, Newt can focus on attacking Romney which enables Santorum to stay positive. I think it’s brilliant ;-) And if it means Newt ends up in a Santorum Cabinet or as VP, no problem with that either.

Go get’em, Newt!


3 posted on 01/04/2012 8:35:14 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Santorum doesn’t need him and shouldn’t trust him.


4 posted on 01/04/2012 8:35:44 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

Great Newt! Then endorse Santorum. :D

Santorum/Newt!


5 posted on 01/04/2012 8:35:58 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Woo Hoo! Team up, boys! Huck and McCain did it in ‘08.

Willard’s worse nightmare revisited.


6 posted on 01/04/2012 8:37:59 AM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

Huge DIFFERANCE btwn a “maverick” and a “Rebel”!


7 posted on 01/04/2012 8:38:29 AM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

“And the thing that’s interesting is if you take the votes, you add to that Perry and Bachmann, you begin to see the size of the conservative vote compared to Romney...if you take, you know, Santorum and Perry and Bachmann and Gingrich you get some sense of what a small minority Romney really represents.” - Newt

Willard is toast.


8 posted on 01/04/2012 8:39:42 AM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Good idea for Newt. No so good for Rick.


9 posted on 01/04/2012 8:40:09 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

That’s wisdom.


10 posted on 01/04/2012 8:40:36 AM PST by Track9 (There IS revolution brewing..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

A few weeks ago when Newt said ,” I new I was going be the GOP candidate” , think he jinxed himself


11 posted on 01/04/2012 8:41:02 AM PST by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Kinda like appearing on the cover of “Sports Illustrated”.


12 posted on 01/04/2012 8:43:14 AM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Oh yes he does. Remember, Willard is trying to buy this thing. Doubling up against Willard is the best chance for Newt and Rick in the next several states.


13 posted on 01/04/2012 8:44:04 AM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

last time I looked Gingrich had a big lead in SC and Santorum was pulling 1%.. I’m sure things have changed a bit from then but doing well in the Iowa straw poll(where he practically lived for the past year) isn’t going to make you the nominee.. Gingrich on the other hand has been coming down here for years promoting Conservative causes.. so we will see who leaves SC with a win and then we can decide.. hey it could be Gingrich, Perry or Santorum.. hopefully not Romney


14 posted on 01/04/2012 8:45:03 AM PST by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

Newt is a bottom feeder and completely untrustworthy.


15 posted on 01/04/2012 8:47:13 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I think that’s exactly what Newt is doing. He probably doesn’t even care if he loses at this point, so long as Mitt doesn’t win. He’ll gladly take the blowback after damaging Mitt.

I have no problem with it either. Mitt may reap what he sowed.


16 posted on 01/04/2012 8:47:38 AM PST by RIRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

This is why I like Newt. He’s always thinking, always coming up with ideas.

He will find that Ricky won’t play with him though.

Did you see Sanctimonious’ AL & TIPPER moment last night? Geeze, get a room.


17 posted on 01/04/2012 8:47:50 AM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

That’s already happening without Newt. I expect a lot of Bachman’s support to fall in place for Santorum. I also expect Bachman to endorse him and eventually Rick Perry will the futility and try to preserve his own future and his support will go to Santorum. I think Mitt for Brains is screwed. And so is Paul.


18 posted on 01/04/2012 8:48:26 AM PST by Harley (Will Rogers never met Harry Reid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Ho-hum. Posted yesterday— -:)

“My impression is that Rick and Newt like each other, and they’ll act as a team to destroy Romney’s pretense as a conservative.

As between Rick and Newt, ultimately I think Newt will come out on top, wt Rick as a potential VP ( he might be able tto bring over PA).

When push comes to shove, Newt is simple more competent— and I think the country wants that now— they want someone to take charge.

But, certainly, if it’s Rick- that would be fine with me.”


19 posted on 01/04/2012 8:49:03 AM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

This isn’t worth spit, unless Gingrich withdraws within days/hours and endorses Santorum.

Otherwise, Gingrich staying in will cost both he and Santorum votes and money.

If a grand compromise is being considered, it should be considered soon to force Romney out at the nearest exit ramp.

That could avoid the conservative branch being shut out.

[I am not particularly fond of either S or G, but this would be a definitely positive move to head off a Romney coronation.]


20 posted on 01/04/2012 8:50:29 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson