BREAKING!!! Georgia Court to Hear Natural Born Citizen Case vs Obama

The National Patriot ^ | 1/3/12 | Craig Andresen

[Nachum]

The liberty Legal Foundation has announced that the case pending in Georgia, challenging Obama’s eligibility, has been ACCEPTED.

This is great news considering Obama and his team of attorneys had been actively trying to have this case DENIED!!

The Georgia court in agreeing to hear the case could well be setting the stage for other states in which quite similar cases are pending. Arizona and Tennessee both have such cases waiting right now.

This case, in Georgia, deals specifically with the Natural Born Citizen issue.

In a previous article, we brought up the Minor vs Happersett case from 1875 in which the Supreme Court defined a NBC as one who has 2 parents which were citizens at the time of the subject’s birth. We also cited 3 other cases in which the Supreme Court, previous to the Minor case, said the same thing.

[freepersup]

A moot point of law was dismissed in this particular motion, if my meager understanding of the judge’s ruling is correct. Freepers have already posted links to the public documents. A motion to sever Plaintiffs was granted, and another motion to dismiss by defendant Barry Soetoro’s attorneys was denied. Orly Taitz, warts and all continues the good fight.

[DiogenesLamp]

I hate to admit it, but I think the Obots may be right about what "the courts" are likely to do. It's too easy for them to decide this issue wrongly.

Here's hoping sanity will prevail.

[NoGrayZone]

ping!

[Hoosier-Daddy]

You might want to read the judge’s response to the motion. Common sense was applied. Quelle horreur!

[Cobra64]

Is it time for panic yet in Obamaland?............

[traditional1]

"Seems to be a court of arbitration and outside the normal law courts??"

Somehow, even though Georgia seems to have this special system of Voting Cases, they will drag the case to Federal Courts, citing "disenfranchisement/standing/etc." contorted grounds to do so, to squelch it.

[freepersup]

The quintessential picture... in lieu of 1,000 words.

Know thy enemy.

;o)

freepersup

[CapnJack]

I like where the story says that this could cause the Dems to look else where for a new candidate.

Now ... who would be the next logical choice if Zero was ever declared ineligible ... hummmmm could it be HITLERY?!?!?!

The only way that this stuff could gain serious legs is for the Clintoons to call in every favor owed to them and get Zero nullified, then Hitlery could step in as the savior of the Dems.

Its possible.

[MMaschin]

"I hate to admit it, but I think the Obots may be right about what "the courts" are likely to do. It's too easy for them to decide this issue wrongly."

According to Georgia law (Code Section 21-2-5(a)) every candidate to state or federal office, must be eligible to that office. And it provides the procedures for any voter in Georgia to challenge a candidates eligibility.

Obama's lawyer argued that for various reasons the office of president was an exception. The judge denied this. That means that Obama must comply with the law, and prove that he is eligible for the office.

The case was severed into 3 separate cases. I only care about the first two, those represented by Irion, and Hatfield.

These cases simply argue that Obama is not eligible for the office of Potus because his father was never a US citizen. And that's it. They require no conspiracy by the state of Hawaii. No forged documents. There only concern is the legal definition of the term 'natural born Citizen'. These cases actually stipulate that they believe that Obama was born in Hawaii. And, that the COLB, and LFBC released by Obama are legit.

Since the Motion to Dismiss was denied. It appears that the court will need to determine 3 things. 1) Obama is over the age of 35. 2) Obama has lived in the US for more than 14 years. And, 3) Obama is a 'natural born Citizen'. There is no way around the fact that a US court WILL determine the legal meaning of the term 'natural born Citizen'.

Obama will not have to provide his COLB, or LFBC, because the paintiffs have already stated that they accept what has been released. What is going to be argued is whether or not Minor V. Happersett is standing legal precedent. And there are many VERY good arguments that it is.

Personally, I think that has always been the issue. I believe that Obama was born in Hawaii. I believe that he's got a LFBC on file just like everyone else. I also believe that the COLB, and LFBC that he released was fraudulent. He has done everything possible to stir up 'birthers'. Every time the issue starts to settle down, bam, something stirs it back up again. Things settle down, and bam, Ambercrombie, one of Obama's biggest supports comments that Hawaii doesn't have a certificate on file. Bam, Trump stirs things up, and then gets some permits in Chicago.

I belive that Obama has done everything he could to create enough evidence that even reasonable people would question whether or nothe was born in Hawaii. And he's done this to obfuscate the one fact he can't hide (because he wrote an entire book about it!), that he's not constitutionally qualified to hold the office of POTUS, because his father was never a US citizen!

[Norm Lenhart]

Whether or not this or similar cases go anywhere ‘now’ they need to happen if for no other reason that to lay the foundation for future legal action if the Just-Us Dept is ever fixed and Constitutional government is ever restored in America.

The first argument libs would make is “Why was no action taken at the time? It’s just a post-facto witch hunt.”

Lay the foundation now and let the cards fall where they may.

[Shery]

Should this go through and he be found ineligible, what we can expect is to be facing off with Hillary next November. That would really be a game-changer!

[baa39]

“Minor vs Happersett case from 1875 in which the Supreme Court defined a NBC as one who has 2 parents which were citizens at the time of the subject’s birth.”

That’s the first time I’ve heard that. All the liberals I know who call “birthers” hysterical nuts base it on the fact of Obama’s mother being a citizen, so he automatically is a NBC. Heard that a thousand times.

Also, this has nothing to do with the Kenya speculations, it has to do with his father’s citizenship status.

Never heard that BOTH parents must be citizens. Finally we clarify “NBC”!

Well, if this ever does get before a judge, doesn’t it make it a done deal? I mean if a legal precedent stands for that definition, Obama clearly does not meet the Constitutional requirement. Do you agree?

Also, if a judge declares his presidency unconstitutional, would it be “revoked” on the spot, and would all Obama’s signed laws, executive orders and such, including Obamacare, be automatically null and void?

[Mortrey]

“JUSTIA.COM SURGICALLY REMOVED “MINOR v HAPPERSETT” FROM 25 SUPREME COURT OPINIONS IN RUN UP TO ’08 ELECTION.”

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/

[Danae]

I have to admit I find this news encouraging!

[Danae]

Ping to the Usual suspects!

I have to admit, I find this encouraging!

[Danae]

Yes that would be a very different race.

[Godebert]

"Also, if a judge declares his presidency unconstitutional, would it be “revoked” on the spot, and would all Obama’s signed laws, executive orders and such, including Obamacare, be automatically null and void?"

No, the MSM (Including FOX News) would just ignore the story and Obama would ignore the ruling. The active duty military officers and elected officials would just continue to ignore their sworn oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

[RedMDer]

[Fred Nerks]

...fingers crossed, but won’t hold my breath, and thanks for the ping.

[Las Vegas Ron]

I have to admit, I find this encouraging!

I'm with you, high hopes but reserved...Happpy New Year to you!!