To: ncalburt
Correct me if I am incorrect here, but is not “earmarking” just saying with specificity how the appreciated money is to be spend? Why is that a bad thing? It is better to just appropriate the money and allow the administration (Obama) to spend it anyway the administration wants to.
10 posted on
01/01/2012 8:28:43 AM PST by
jpsb
To: jpsb
Who are you trying to fool here!
You know what PORK is !
Pork is the mothers milk of Big Government.
This racist lying fraud had some nerve peddling
Some little govt bs while spreading millions of my tax dollars to his pals on Texas !
The fraud fought and voted against the GOP Pork Ban !
The Jew hating fraud was acting like a Pig in Mud during the
Phony Stimulus scan and demanded over 134,000,000
That year!
18 posted on
01/01/2012 8:44:12 AM PST by
ncalburt
(NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !)
To: jpsb
Correct me if I am incorrect here, but is not earmarking just saying with specificity how the appreciated money is to be spend?
If there is nothing wrong with wasting money with bribes called earmarks, why does the surrender monkey say he is against them? If he is truly against them why does he acquire more bribes called earmarks than any other candidate running? Maybe because he is just plain dishonest.
35 posted on
01/01/2012 4:58:16 PM PST by
John D
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson