Posted on 12/29/2011 8:26:25 AM PST by wgflyer
For me, Ann now lives in the land of used to be. She used to a person I listened to. She used to be a person who made sense. She used to be a person who looked at the facts and saw things as they were. Now, she looks at the facts and see things as she wants them to be.
My god. My exact words, Ann must be reading FR!
Amnesty is the defining issue. That issue disqualifies Amnesty Newt.
Ann is given to overstatement but in this case I agree with her. America itself is actually at stake in the November elections and the repeal of Obamacare and the securing of the borders as the first step in a rational immigration policy.
Ann is given to overstatement but in this case I agree with her. America itself is actually at stake in the November elections and the repeal of Obamacare and the securing of the borders as the first step in a rational immigration policy.
LOL
I think Ann just went "full retard". Sadly, far too many voters are willing to believe this nonsense.
Only one candidate right on Two major issues:
Obamacare and Immigration
That would be Bachmann
what I hate about Ann is how she talks to us like we are knuckle draggin a holes
FU AC
Is this chick sleeping with Rove?
So now she stumps, earnestly to be sure, for Romney. She makes the case that Romney is the only one certain to oppose Obamacare simply because "all the candidates oppose it."
Wish I could believe the Governor did, but does he?
And I must have missed something, but is Romney seriously the most opposed to illegal immigration?
Again, seriously?
Her whole case, as with Christie, seems to rest on nominating a candidate who "can win."
Is she right about Santorum being unlikely to be effective at stopping illegal immigration?
For someone who makes such an effective case for the existential threat we face with both Obamacare and illegal immigration she doesn't close the deal for Romney very effectively.
From the article:
"As a senator, Rick Santorum voted against even the voluntary use of E-Verify."
Why would a conservative candidate vote against one of the very few positive things the feds do to enforce immigration laws?
Ann’s right on the two most critical issues, but it’s Congress that can make things right on both. Only Congress can repeal Obamacare and Congress can refuse to pass any and all amnesty schemes.
We need to retain and even strengthen control of the House and win back the Senate with, hopefully, a gain of at least eight to get to the mid-fifties. Then we need a president to sign a repeal of Obamacare and also enforce existing immigration laws.
I’ve given up finding an ideal Republican presidential candidate.
The only thing Romney ever did about illeagal immigration as governor was to sign a law that empowered the Mass. state troopers to to enforce immigration laws. He talks about it like it gives him credibility but if you dig deeper, you see that he signed the law a month before he left office knowing full well that it would be repealed a month later by the incoming governor, deval patrick. It was then, in fact, repealed within a week of leaving office having never been enforced. It was Bull Shiite and he’s lieing to us when he touts it. Romney isn’t the kind of Republican that thinks illegal immigration is bad, he’s the kind of republican that bullshiites us on every core conservative issue from illegal immigration to the second amendment to health care to abortion.
“Why would a conservative candidate vote against one of the very few positive things the feds do to enforce immigration laws?”
Rick is the only real conservative in the race, dont’cha know.
At least that’s what the purity caucus keeps telling us.
Right, Coulter not only jumped the shark, she now even looks like the Fonze!
I don't know, but it reminds me of the great job done by TSA. /S
First of all, I disagree with her with WHAT is the most important issues of today. But Romney is no good for America. He is the same as zero.
Education is the No.1 issue—and we need to get rid of DOE and the indoctrination machine—yesterday! We are mass producing Marxists every day-—and immigration wouldn’t be a problem if our schools weren’t PC (cultural Marxism) to destroy the minds and thinking of the new immigrants. We are creating race hatred and class envy and man-hatred and women-hatred and child hatred—with the feminist/homosexual/marxist communist agitprop being pumped into all schools 24/7. We need to get back to our God-centered curricula—like in the McGuffey Readers that Dewey—the socialist—threw out. We need to TEACH, not indoctrinate and “shape” the “plastic minds” of the children. We need intelligent, well educated population.
NO. 2: Rule of Law. All laws have to be enforced. We no longer have a Justice system, though. It is rights of criminals tyrannizing the majority. They have special rights and indoctrinating our children with their lies and moral relativism—which is antithetical to the Constitution—based on Objective Truth—God’s Laws. Just Laws are laws based on Moral Absolutes not barney frank’s urges and standards. (Ann should understand this!!!!! Romney sure doesn’t.)
No. 3 : The MSM. They lie, slander and are not held accountable by our legal system. Death-hold on information has to be de-monopolized. We can’t have one person like Soros controlling all the information for most people. Internet has to stay absolutely free of government control.
No. 4. Politicians and judges NOW can be immoral and keep their position. Our Founding Fathers said that they would HAVE to step down if there was even an appearance of impropriety. Holder should be gone years ago. Pelosi should be gone years ago. Homosexual judges who think sodomy is “good” should not be able to take an oath to God on the Bible and sit on the bench. They should be forced to step down. Their ideology is not compatible with a nation and legal system built on “laws of nature and Nature’s God.” Objective Truth has to be incorporated into our Positive Laws—laws which deny Objective Truth are “null and void” (Supra Positive Law).
No. 5. No lobbyists—NONE. They bribe and corrupt.
No 6. All speeches are to be written by the politicians—NO speech writers. If they can’t write a decent speech—they are not good enough or smart enough to run a country. We want no spin doctors—all such people eliminated from the payrolls of the American taxpayers.
We need schools to teach like they did BEFORE the Marxist takeover by John Dewey. We need to educate the people-—not brainwash them into dependency.
Mexicans—like the Cubans—can be great citizens—if they are not corrupted by the system like they have been since the “Hey Ho Western Civ has got to Go”—days. These immigrant’s children could be a great asset since too many American women abort their babies or get sterilized. Then again—they are not above the law—or get special treatment. Special treatment (as affirmative action) create weak people......perseverance comes from overcoming hardship—the way early Americans did—Thomas Sowell did, Clarence Thomas did. Hardships make better citizens. Giving things to people without earning it makes weak, manipulative, unmotivated people.
It would be nice if the republican elitists just say what everyone already knows. They do not care about who is President as long as they have the majorities in both houses and SCOTUS.
They are not fighting to win. They are fighting not to lose.
Idiots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.