Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Declares It Is Ready To Expand Military Ties With Iraq
Business Insider ^ | Dec. 25, 2011 | Robert Johnson

Posted on 12/26/2011 12:53:17 AM PST by LeoWindhorse

A week after U.S. forces pulled out of Iraq, Iran has announced its willingness to expand its military and security links with Baghdad.

The AFP reports Iranian General Hassan Firouzabadi praised the "forced departure" of U.S. troops, saying it ""was due to the resistance and determination of the Iraqi people and the government."

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dncretreat; iran; iraq; obama; obama457states; obama4mullahs; obamaretreat

1 posted on 12/26/2011 12:53:23 AM PST by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

First strike , strike first

We can do better than ‘shock and awe’


2 posted on 12/26/2011 12:54:31 AM PST by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse
First strike , strike first

We can do better than ‘shock and awe’

Unfortunately, not with the muzzie currently occupying the W.H.

3 posted on 12/26/2011 1:06:16 AM PST by radu (May God watch over our troops and keep them safe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse
Well who didn’t see this coming?

Obama

He did this to placate his passivist base for the coming election. Well it just may backfire on him.

4 posted on 12/26/2011 3:31:57 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because oit is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radu
First strike , strike first We can do better than ‘shock and awe’ Unfortunately, not with the muzzie currently occupying the W.H.

Hell, we didn't really do it under Bush who actually wanted to defend us. With the mentality of the times, we would lose another WWI or WWII - everyone's so concerned about collateral damage they won't allow the wholesale destruction of combatants.

5 posted on 12/26/2011 3:38:47 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

Since the Bamster invaded Libya and snuffed his bud Q-Daffy all bets are off. He’s shown himself capable of doing anything to get reelected, including making war on Iran. (After all they’re Shi’ite not Sunni like his MuBro pals.)


6 posted on 12/26/2011 3:46:28 AM PST by Blado (Obama is a coprolite from the Late Soviet Era)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse
A week after U.S. forces pulled out of Iraq, Iran has announced its willingness to expand its military and security links with Baghdad.
Gee whiz. Now who'd a thunk it?!?
Not Barry but hey he's busy running for reelection.
Can't blame him for every little thing that goes wrong.

Iraq = Vietnam ver2.0

7 posted on 12/26/2011 4:45:07 AM PST by Condor51 (Yo Hoffa, so you want to 'take out conservatives'. Well okay Jr - I'm your Huckleberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blado

The foreign policy of the Obama regime is to take down secular dictators to replace them with Islamic extremists.


8 posted on 12/26/2011 5:24:56 AM PST by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse
A decade fighting in this place, thousands of American casualties, hundreds of billions of dollars.

For what? Saddam and his evil, sadistic sons were outta the game early. The threat was eliminated.

We rode to Brook Army Medical Center a while back to give the wounded a donations and a couple of guys that were able to come out to meet with us were all tore up.

For what? The real threats (Iran/Saudi Arabia/Pakistan) are still in business while we fart around in Afghanistan trying to take out a bunch cave dwellers.

Rules of engagement? PC bullcrap? Take a look at the wounded, it's pretty f’d up.

We've got the non nuclear technology to decimate whole cities. We don't need to put boots on the ground until these little tin horn countries bend into submission due to relentless bombing raids.

9 posted on 12/26/2011 6:33:30 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Don’t think Iraq is the same as Vietnam version 2. For one, lot more of us died in Vietnam. Second, in the end, Vietnam paved an independent path, and the domino theory was discredited. In contrast, in Iraq, it is the big domino that we gave on a platter to Iraq.


10 posted on 12/26/2011 7:01:46 AM PST by yinandyang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
He did this to placate his passivist base for the coming election. Well it just may backfire on him.

That, plus the fact that he encourages the Islamic caliphate. The pacifist idiots don't know any better in regards to his agenda, so he gets two birds with one stone.
11 posted on 12/26/2011 7:17:54 AM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yinandyang
Uh-huh. Whatever you say NEWBIE.
12 posted on 12/26/2011 8:21:56 AM PST by Condor51 (Yo Hoffa, so you want to 'take out conservatives'. Well okay Jr - I'm your Huckleberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

The upcoming middle east war, brought to you by Hope N Change, Inc.

The easiest scenario to envision is an Iraq civil war in which the Sunni provinces secede and are attacked by Iraqi Shia militias (and much of the Iraqi army), abetted by large numbers of Iranian Revolutionary Guards/Hezbollah.

Think the larger Sunni world will sit and watch the ethnic cleansing / genocide of the Sunnis in Iraq? Nope.


13 posted on 12/26/2011 9:06:11 AM PST by denydenydeny (The more a system is all about equality in theory the more it's an aristocracy in practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

Smart diplomacy. Thanks Obama. Over 4000 US servicemen died for nothing. Wonderful.


14 posted on 12/26/2011 9:09:40 AM PST by bkopto (Obama is merely a symptom of a more profound, systemic disease in American body politic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
Hell, we didn't really do it under Bush who actually wanted to defend us. With the mentality of the times, we would lose another WWI or WWII - everyone's so concerned about collateral damage they won't allow the wholesale destruction of combatants.

The way I see it, Bush had two problems. He had to deal with too many "doves' and not enough "hawks" in the military to get the job done right. He also had the commie media's constant presence in the war zones, crying and whining to the bleeding hearts.

With Hussein at the helm, we have even more "doves" in charge. The ROEs are worse than ever for our troops, which is why so many more have been lost in Afghanistan.
I don't know that I want him sending more of our men and women into another war zone for that reason.

Another WW with today's mentality, this country is toast.

15 posted on 12/26/2011 12:19:37 PM PST by radu (May God watch over our troops and keep them safe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yinandyang
in the end, Vietnam paved an independent path, and the domino theory was discredited.

Try telling that to the dominoes in Laos, Cambodia, the "independent" boat people who fled HoChiMinh City by the hundreds of thousands, and the ten or so other countries that went communist during the next four years of the hapless Carter administration, once they realized that the US was no longer serious about containment.

16 posted on 12/26/2011 2:28:33 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard; yinandyang

U.S. involvement in Vietnam did contain communist expansion long enough to allow emerging post-colonial countries in East Asia time to develop their governments, economies and will to resist the Reds. Imelda Marcos said LBJ told her that the Vietnam War was not about Indochina but about the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, etc. The war caused the Soviets to expend billions that their economy couldn’t regenerate. They inherited a war-torn, economic basket case. The South resisted collectivization and capitalism spread north. Now the Vietnamese want the U.S. to reoccupy Cam Rhan Bay. Some might say the war never ended.


17 posted on 12/26/2011 10:59:26 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson