Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia 2011 Candidate for Legislature has Impact on Pres. Primary (Newt & Perry have a case?)
Ballot Access News ^ | 12-25-2011 | Richard Winger

Posted on 12/25/2011 4:41:06 PM PST by smoothsailing

Virginia 2011 Independent Candidate for Legislature has Big Impact on 2012 Presidential Primary

December 25th, 2011

There are currently many news stories and blog discussions about the Virginia presidential primary ballot access law. Some large blogs, such as Red State, have over 300 comments about the story. Some defend the current Virginia ballot access laws on the grounds that in past presidential elections, a fairly large number of Republican presidential primary candidates managed to qualify.

But what has not been reported is that in the only other presidential primaries in which Virginia required 10,000 signatures (2000, 2004, and 2008) the signatures were not checked. Any candidate who submitted at least 10,000 raw signatures was put on the ballot. In 2000, five Republicans qualified: George Bush, John McCain, Alan Keyes, Gary Bauer, and Steve Forbes. In 2004 there was no Republican primary in Virginia. In 2008, seven Republicans qualified: John McCain, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, and Alan Keyes.

The only reason the Virginia Republican Party checked the signatures for validity for the current primary is that in October 2011, an independent candidate for the legislature, Michael Osborne, sued the Virginia Republican Party because it did not check petitions for its own members, when they submitted primary petitions. Osborne had no trouble getting the needed 125 valid signatures for his own independent candidacy, but he charged that his Republican opponent’s primary petition had never been checked, and that if it had been, that opponent would not have qualified. The lawsuit, Osborne v Boyles, cl 11-520-00, was filed in Bristol County Circuit Court. It was filed too late to be heard before the election, but is still pending. The effect of the lawsuit was to persuade the Republican Party to start checking petitions. If the Republican Party had not changed that policy, Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry would be on the 2012 ballot.

The Democratic Party of Virginia has been opposed to the strict law on primary ballot access, and has been in the habit of collecting signatures for all Democratic presidential candidates recognized by the party. In 2008, the state party collected 7,300 signatures for all its candidates, thus easing the burden on them and requiring them to collect only 4,000 to 5,000 on their own.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: elections; gingrich; grandoldplantation; michaelosborne; newt; osborne; perry; stinkslikemitt; va2012; vageneralassembly; virginia; virginiaprimary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-244 next last
To: Parley Baer; All

From other FR posts apparently both Paul and Romney have submitted at least 15,000 signatures. Probably should be enough to cover deletions.


161 posted on 12/25/2011 11:16:50 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
You might want to take a peek at this post at Tea Party Nation.
There is nothing like bring a little light to a dark subject.
It's politics, there's gotta be something dirty.

I'm sure Ken Cuchinelli's ears are ringing.
162 posted on 12/26/2011 12:40:58 AM PST by bksanders (Spewing Forth Vitriol at the Speed of Spit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
Louisa Woman dies in car wreck

Her and her husband were returning from the ballot verification (the story doesn't say that, a blogger made the connection:

RPV Volunteer killed in crash, husband with life-threatening injuries

163 posted on 12/26/2011 3:16:44 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: conservaterian

>> So you guys are all saying it would be ok if someone that needed 10k signatures just had a bunch of fake names? That nobody should bother to check the signatures? What about our fight to stop the libs from doing the exact same thing in elections? >>

With due respect, that’s a poorly constructed argument and a false choice. No one said to have just a bunch of fake names, so your statement is ridiculous. Second, to equate a bureaucratic registration requirement that serves no purpose with actual voting and voter fraud is a very poor argument.


164 posted on 12/26/2011 4:51:27 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Seriously, have you ever stopped to think how stupid this requirement is in the first place? I mean put aside the technical application of the rule (and you said law, it is NOT a law) for a minute.

There is no reason for this to even exist. It is rules for rules sake. It is the ultimate in meaningless bureaucracy. It makes zero sense for the party who is supposed to stand against meaningless bureaucracy to tie itself in knots over meaningless bureaucracy. There is no reason to add this cost to a political process.


165 posted on 12/26/2011 4:55:04 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Wayne, with both the arch traitor Mitbots out of the way there's no reason for Ken to settle for Governor. He can leap ahead to the Senate (unless he's missed the filing deadline, although I see a judge discovering all the rules are UNCONSTITUTIOPNAL).

Think big.

166 posted on 12/26/2011 5:20:27 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: shield

Doesn’t this Bolling have some kind of connection with GWB?


167 posted on 12/26/2011 5:22:22 AM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for Santorum if he is on the April 3 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

Being “legal enough” and “being politically astute” are two different things. Time for the Board members to move back to Baltimore County.


168 posted on 12/26/2011 5:32:45 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
You can try to defend the Governor if you want, but it's pretty obvious he's happy with the situation or he'd been out there agitating for relief.

He didn't. He's a Mitbot. So is Bolling.

All of these guys gotta' have some less than savory connections somewhere ~ the AG is in charge of moving in on them for that although we'd probably need a federal prosecution looming ~ and there the problem is that the Obots will protect them.

169 posted on 12/26/2011 5:36:24 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
The pressure to find bad addresses (still an inadequate determinant in Virginia) must have been intense. Then forcing them to drive home at night in driving rain, ice and snow ~ drunks on the road threatening their safety.

Heartless bunch.

170 posted on 12/26/2011 5:39:35 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: bksanders

Your link to Tea Party Nation requires membership sign-up to see.
Could you summarize what is there for the non-members?


171 posted on 12/26/2011 5:41:02 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Do what the I candidate did - demand equal treatment to all parties -
soetoro/soebarkah/shabazz/bounel/obama the Democrat should be held to the rules too. He is NOT an article 2 natural born citizen thus ineligible to be the pres. Disqaulify obama and remove him from or keep his name off the ballot!


172 posted on 12/26/2011 5:41:24 AM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: bksanders

“Tea Party Nation is a social network”

No thanks.


173 posted on 12/26/2011 5:43:56 AM PST by Fresh Wind ('People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

And what wasn’t noted in this story is that the Romney and Paul signatures were not checked.


174 posted on 12/26/2011 5:44:57 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Perry (or Gingrich maybe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

It has been explained that under the 15,000/600 and up signature policy Romney’s petitioners were not validated.

Why weren’t Paul’s? Did he also get more than 15,000 signatures with more than 600 from each district?


175 posted on 12/26/2011 5:59:47 AM PST by Piranha (If you seek perfection you will end up with Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: casinva

Thanks for your words of support! I live near George Washington’s Mt. Vernon, and I shudder to think what he would say about what’s going on in his home state.


176 posted on 12/26/2011 6:02:20 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC; All
Exactly right. Romney's and Paul's organizations knew about this requirement, and it's not because they got the message on their Karl Rove Secret Decoder Rings, either. It's because they had boots on the ground.

Newt is my first choice, Perry my second BTW - they just need to suck it up and move forward from here.

177 posted on 12/26/2011 6:20:08 AM PST by Notary Sojac (Liberalism: Ideas so good, they have to be mandatory!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj
Actually, the Obot trick for dealing with primary challengers is the same one the Mitbots are using to dispose of their primary challengers.

Given Bollings involvement in this, and McDonnell's complicity, I think ALL Republicans across the nation should become alert to the fact we have professionals at work here who are so corrupt there's no trick so low they won't bend their backs to do.

Just think of it like Obama is running as a Republican who looks like Mitt. We know you can't trust Obama's friends; well, you can't trust Mitt's friends and associates either.

178 posted on 12/26/2011 6:24:23 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

He’d say “Send out more likker”.


179 posted on 12/26/2011 6:25:38 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

You know, something occurred to me. What if VA is going to seriously crack down on RAT election fraud and needs proof that they intend to penalize BOTH parties?

Fingers crossed that’s the case.


180 posted on 12/26/2011 6:33:49 AM PST by txhurl (Perry/Pence 2012 OR Perry/Ryan 2012 or even better Perry/Abbott 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-244 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson