Posted on 12/24/2011 11:40:18 AM PST by DeaconBenjamin
School funding in Texas is in turmoil. State lawmakers slashed more than $4 billion from education this school year — one of the largest cuts in state history — and more than 12,000 teachers and support staff have been laid off.
Academic programs and transportation have been cut to the bone. Promising reforms are on hold or on the chopping block. Next year, the cuts could go even deeper.
Schools in Pasadena, just outside Houston, have seen tight budgets before, but never like this. There was $21 million in cuts this fall alone and 340 positions eliminated, Candace Ahlfinger, an associate superintendent of schools in Pasadena, says. Of those cuts, about 180 were teaching positions and 160 were support staff, she says.
Special education teachers who worked with dyslexic kids: gone. Teachers' aides: gone. Dozens of bus drivers, crossing guards and security personnel: gone.
With the district's $350 million budget shrinking and more cuts on the horizon, Ahlfinger says: "Everything has been on the chopping block. There's not been a sacred cow. There's nothing that we have said 'No, we cannot touch that.'"
The state granted Pasadena schools a waiver so that the district could legally raise class size above the maximum 22 mandated in grades K-4. About 7,000 schools have been granted such waivers statewide, a three-fold increase from last year.
A Charge For The Extras
Still, every morning teachers in Pasadena grit their teeth and pretend everything is fine. School officials here considered asking parents to pay for some services, but 80 percent of families in the district live at or below the federal poverty level.
In many school districts across Texas, though, parents are footing the bill for things like bus transportation, field trips, athletics and uniforms.
"Something's got to give, right?" says Jackie Lain with the Texas Association of School Boards. "They're charging for any of the extras that they don't absolutely have to provide, so that they can keep teachers employed in the classrooms."
Lain says the 6 percent cut in school funding this year was bad enough. Next year, it will be 8 to 9 percent.
Even wealthy school districts are feeling the pinch. Leander is a bedroom community just outside Austin that's growing like crazy, but it doesn't have enough money to open two brand new schools that it built to relieve overcrowding.
With less money from the state, Leander had to cut $20 million from its budget and lay off 213 employees, 50 of them classroom teachers.
Leander was supposed to open what's known as Middle School No. 8 this year. It's an enormous building and there's a lot of construction going on at the site, but that was slowed this summer because the district cannot afford to open it.
Leander schools Superintendent Bret Champion says Texas raised school funding consistently every year for the past half century, until now. "For the first time since World War II, the state hasn't funded what it had promised to fund," he says.
What Can Be Cut?
At a football game between Leander High and Vista Ridge High School, the funding crisis is the last thing on parents' minds. The stadium fills quickly; it's supposed to be a good game.
Leander has already eliminated golf and tennis. What if football is next?
"I'd spend a thousand bucks out of pocket myself to make sure it'd stay," says Ross Briton, whose son plays football. "I'd work two jobs if it took that to do it. End of story."
Briton says it's not just a sport here: It's part of the culture and a big part of the community's identity. The district should pare down the curriculum before it cuts football, he says.
"I would cut most liberal arts out of the high school. I'd keep math, science, reading. I'd add the vocational education back, because I think there's too much fluff," Briton says.
Several parents in the parking lot nod in agreement as they walk away; others stay behind to say they disagree. Cutting instructional programs, they say, is more damaging than cutting sports.
Kate Patterson works for a local nonprofit that ran a program for struggling readers in the Austin area, including Leander. Sadly, it's been cut, she says, and lawmakers don't seem to care.
"Honestly, I'm not looking to the government anymore," Patterson says. It's as if Texas has thrown in the towel when it comes to education, she says, but some lawmakers blame voters.
"Legislators respond to what they hear," says Scott Hochberg, a Democrat and state representative from Houston.
Hochberg says parents and community organizations that are aghast at the cuts' impact haven't put nearly enough pressure on legislators
"I think they need to put their votes where their mouths are," he says.
A Hold On The Rainy Day Fund
Texas, meanwhile, is sitting on at least $5 billion in its rainy day fund. It's mostly gas and oil revenues. Hochberg says lawmakers refuse to draw from the fund to blunt the education cuts because the governor told them not to.
"The governor drew a very, very sharp line in the sand [saying] that the rainy day fund, which was specifically designed for periods of economic slowdown, would not be touched," he says.
NPR repeatedly called Gov. Rick Perry and numerous Republican legislators asking them to comment for this story; they refused.
The president of the anti-tax lobbying group Empower Texans, however, did not. For too long, Michael Sullivan says, the state has thrown tons of money at education.
"We've assumed that, well, more money equals better education. Let's just spend more money," he says. "How much more money do we need to spend? ... More, more, more, more. We have doubled real per pupil spending in the past 10 years."
And yet, Sullivan says, Texas has nothing to show for it. Schools still graduate students who are unprepared for college or work; that's why school districts have no credibility when they complain about funding, he says.
The Impact On Low-Income Students
Sandy Kress, an attorney in Austin with close ties to both political parties, doesn't go that far, but he too faults school districts for looking at this as a crisis rather than an opportunity to show they can be more efficient with the money they get.
"The system is getting defensive about having to make the changes it has to make," Kress says. "It's resisting change and accountability just as people who are paying the taxes are getting tired of paying the taxes. I am definitely worried."
Kress says efficiency and accountability are crucial, but he worries even more that Texas will revert to the bad old days when school districts used tight budgets as an excuse for neglecting low-income and minority students.
"The result is that children will be left behind, gaps will grow again and we may be in a place where we are retreating instead of advancing for the first time in 50 years," Kress says. "And this is disastrous."
Already, the $4.3 billion in school funding cuts seems to have made the disparity between poor and wealthy school districts worse. A poor district now gets $800 less per student from the state than a wealthy district.
More than 300 school districts are now suing. They're hoping the courts will declare the cuts and the school funding formula in Texas unconstitutional.
Texas doesn’t charge students for Bus service.
But here is a more timely article on the situation. I find it interesting that the found 5 Billion to help pay for EDU.
IIRC Houston was going to lay off a bunch of teachers and when the final budget came in they didn’t have too.
Please notice that there are no administrators in this list.
The admin jobs are the big money jobs....with special retirement and buy out clauses that rip off the taxpayer more than any group of teachers would
Reality is that school cuts are a joke...the big cuts do not get made. Many of the admin jobs end up getting filled by the former politicians
No bi-lingual teachers either...
.
The problem across the usa is the overall pay and cost structure. Teachers , admn, staff, etc are grossly overpaid for the amount of work they allegedly do.
Bilingual education needs to GO. It may just get shopped this coming year. We have kids in this state who have been in bilingual education for 6-7 years and still can’t function in English. That would be because bilingual teachers (from Mexico) can speak Spanish but not English.
shopped = “chopped”
Charge all illegals enough to cover their kids school expense.
So?....Why do team sports need to be tax supported? Why not privatize them? This father is willing to pay a $1,000 to have his son play football.
Good point.
The average school superintendent gets more than $200,000 a year plus benefits. The problem is that too many school systems have too many federal and state mandates laid upon them, plus they tend to have facilities too rich for their blood. Then we have the demographic/political problem: the children of immigrants put a huge burden on the school system just to get the kid up to half speed. They hire half-educated teachers who get their jobs because they know Spanish but know little else. I dare say that the teachers in country schools in the 1930s have more knowledge of math and literature than those in the large urban schools.
You missed the sarcasm of my saying they would have to pay. I did not indicate they did. Only sarcastically that they would start having too.
—Give any kid, of any age, who passes the GED a certified and official diploma from his local high school!
— Give any parent $5,000 if they remove their child from government school.
— Put all K-12 courses on the Internet ( contract with someone from India to do it) . If the child passes a qualifying exam in that course he immediately moves to the next level in that specific subject. Even if he is 10 or 11, if he finishes all the courses and passes the GED give him an official diploma from his local high school.
Solution: The fewer kids in school, and the more quickly they move the system, the fewer classrooms and teachers needed. Result? Massive savings.
By the way....Why aren't **all** government school classes filmed and on-line for FREE for anyone of any age to use? Hey! The taxpayers paid for it why hide it like this information was some secret initiation rite?
No bi-lingual teachers either...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yep! Good point!
“The problem across the usa is the overall pay and cost structure. Teachers , admn, staff, etc are grossly overpaid for the amount of work they allegedly do.”
Take a look at this: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/02/arlene-ackerman-ex-philad_n_1120637.html
I have often said that Public School Superintendents are the highest paid migrant workers in the country. Most are former PS school teachers who haven’t a clue about managing a business which is what the PS education system is afterall.
If it comes from NPR, then you can be assured that it is BS of the highest quality from the people who produce the most of it.
Just to add to your excellent list of ideas, which I totally agree with. Return to the old way of teaching arithmetic and math. Get rid of sex education altogether and return that responsibility to the parents where it belongs. I am all for moving all schools to the internet, the way you outline it would work well and really cut down on the brainwashing liberals are doing to our children now.
I will feel sympathy for teachers and school administrations when they start being frank about what the body of children born to illegals is costing their school districts.
Why should I go out of my way to ally with them, if they’re going to act as if their schools are in Mexico?
We simply cannot afford to pick up the tab any longer.
The Supreme Court in Plyler Vs Doe ruled that since state consumption taxes fund the public schools, illegals have to have free access to public K-12 schools. The state of Texas had been trying to charge them yearly tuition fees or kick them out entirely, but these efforts were struck down in 1982.
That came to me after I hit post. Sorry!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.