Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Paul has got to go.

Open primaries/caucuses should go with him.

1 posted on 12/20/2011 8:22:29 AM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TBBT

Yesterday there was a post showing how the Paul camp was actively recruiting Democrats to vote for him.

Considering they don’t have a primary battle to deal with on their own, they are fighting it by trying to crap all over the Republican primary.


2 posted on 12/20/2011 8:25:13 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT
So there is something wrong with the process if they don't get to control the outcome.

Tells you a lot.

PS - I am not a Paultard. I just consider the entire caucus/primary process to be corrupt. I say have national runoffs until somebody gets 50% of the vote.

3 posted on 12/20/2011 8:25:16 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (FOREIGN AID: A transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

Cut and Run has been spending tons of money slinging mud at Newt. I wonder if he will have enough left to buy the amount of dope it is going to take to keep the potheads there until the voting begins.


4 posted on 12/20/2011 8:26:19 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

How soon people forget.

“G.H.W. Bush wins 1979 Iowa Caucus”.


5 posted on 12/20/2011 8:28:04 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

WTH, if it’s in the cards, Dr Paul will prevail, if not.....we all lose...

semper Watching!
*****


9 posted on 12/20/2011 8:34:05 AM PST by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

I find it interesting that the Hacker group has issued a “warning” that they will hack the primary votes.

That would cause a mess.

I suspect many of the paulistas are just troll bashing candidats since ron paul has no credibility.


15 posted on 12/20/2011 8:46:36 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT
The dawning realization of what a Ron Paul win in the Iowa caucuses would mean for Republicans, Iowa, and the caucuses has apparently begun to dawn on Iowa Republicans.

If the Paulistinians win in Iowa, it will merely erase any malingering credibility given to the IA caucuses. But they're pretty circling the bowl already.

23 posted on 12/20/2011 9:06:41 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

First, Republicans in all states should move to a closed primary system. If you’re not registered as a Republican by, say, 60 days before an election, then you don’t get to help pick the GOP candidates. It really should be that simple. It’s absolutely insane to allow members of the other parties choose a party’s candidates, and that goes for Dems too.

Second, Iowa is a caucus state. As such, they caucus, and debate, on the night that they vote. Arguments such as this will no doubt be made, and made effectively, by supporters of the other candidates. People unaware of Paul’s history will be made aware of it that night, and the concern of making the Iowa caucus a joke will also be heard.

And, in Iowa, people are likely to know their neighbors and their political leanings. It will take some serious guts for a known Democrat to show up at a meeting populated with hundreds of his/her Republican neighbors, intending to screw with them. For these reasons, I suspect Paul’s support will drop significantly before the vote is taken.

However, in open primary states, like Wisconsin, crossovers will be frequent, and this year the Democrats are bound to mess with the GOP. All they have to do is show up and pick the right ballot, all in secret, so nothing discourages them from doing so. Republicans need to change this process, for the good of the party.


24 posted on 12/20/2011 9:13:04 AM PST by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

Why did you post the same paragraph twice?


26 posted on 12/20/2011 9:45:53 AM PST by upchuck (Let's have the Revolution NOW before we get dumbed down to the point that we can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

I am not a Paul supporter.

BUT . . .

If Paul wins Iowa (which he might well do), and Romney finishes in fourth or so (a real possibility), it really makes it clea that Romney is unwanted in the heartland.


27 posted on 12/20/2011 9:46:16 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney be the Mo Udall of 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson