Skip to comments.
The Past and the Present (Thomas Sowell on Newt Gingrich)
Creators Syndicate ^
| December 20, 2011
| Thomas Sowell
Posted on 12/19/2011 9:59:22 AM PST by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-134 next last
To: Responsibility2nd
I’m not name-calling. I’ve stated a fact.
61
posted on
12/19/2011 11:18:44 AM PST
by
Chunga
(What a load of codswallop!)
To: Chunga
62
posted on
12/19/2011 11:21:19 AM PST
by
b9
To: sickoflibs
wow, the bots are comin out of the wood work harder and faster by the day...
the ABBB crowd will be full chorus before new years...
63
posted on
12/19/2011 11:21:56 AM PST
by
Gilbo_3
(Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
To: Responsibility2nd
If I gave a crap on how wrong you are - I would bookmark your goofy tagline and waive it in your face (Nyah-nyah-nyaaahhhh) when Sarah Palin endorses Mitt Romney.So what? I'm a big Sarah fan, bought her books and went to her rallies, but at this point, why would her endorsement influence my vote?
If you think that those of us that love and respect Sarah are mind numbed Sarah-bots you are so wrong, and it's easy to see why you are anti Newt, you are brainless.
64
posted on
12/19/2011 11:27:53 AM PST
by
USS Alaska
(Merry Christmas-Nuke The Terrorist Savages)
To: b9
Dr. Sowell’s article is superb. But as Andy Mccarthy (who dissented from National Review’s Editorial against Newt) writes in today’s NRO, Newt’s statements are so utterly implausible that it is like giving Obama a wrecking ball to launch against Newt. As other FReepers have pointed out the problem with Newt, is Newt. With Reagan we could all confidently say “Let Reagan be Reagan” and we can’t say this with Newt.
65
posted on
12/19/2011 11:31:49 AM PST
by
Steelfish
(ui)
To: jazusamo
Oh NO!
Someone like Thomas Sowell, making logical sense and pointing out something positive about why we need a man like Newt leading the country! That won’t do! (/s)
66
posted on
12/19/2011 11:33:46 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: Responsibility2nd
Well then you sound perfectly happy with Romney or Paul.
Keep up the great effort to help the Democrats put the finishing touches on destroying the country. You did your part, It must make you happy and proud.
67
posted on
12/19/2011 11:37:23 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Well then you sound perfectly happy with Romney or Paul.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Either you can’t read or you don’t think Romney or Paul are RINO’s.
68
posted on
12/19/2011 11:41:32 AM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
To: Gilbo_3
RE :"
wow, the bots are comin out of the wood work harder and faster by the day... the ABBB crowd will be full chorus before new years... "
Saw it, They are competing with the ABNG crowd. The ABBAR crowd is shrinking.
69
posted on
12/19/2011 11:42:43 AM PST
by
sickoflibs
(You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
To: Steelfish
I used to think Steyn was the smartest man in the room.
He still thinks he is.
Sowell has the smarts to see the worth of Newt.
Steyn doesn’t have the same stake - he’s not even a US citizen.
70
posted on
12/19/2011 11:43:01 AM PST
by
b9
To: Gilbo_3
Correction, the ABBNG crowd.
71
posted on
12/19/2011 11:57:43 AM PST
by
sickoflibs
(You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
To: jazusamo
It’s coming down to Paul, Romney or Newt. The country would survive Newt. Paul is unelectable and Romney would crush the conservative movement. I don’t see a heck of a lot of options.
72
posted on
12/19/2011 12:04:03 PM PST
by
FastCoyote
(I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
To: loveliberty2
73
posted on
12/19/2011 12:24:06 PM PST
by
Jacquerie
(No court will save us from ourselves.)
To: Prokopton
You mean a sometime conservative, sometime liberal suck up, Republican backstabbing, amnesty loving, consummate insider, "maverick"? Na, no similarity at all. I'm thinking of the Speaker who oversaw the contract With America, four consecutive budget surlpuses and the only significant welfare reform ever passed. He's the man who was totally exonerated of any wrongdoing after a four year investigation by the IRS.
74
posted on
12/19/2011 12:46:20 PM PST
by
skeptoid
(The road to serfdom is being paved by RINO's, and Lisa Murkowski is their mascot.)
To: skeptoid
The federal budget was balanced in '98, '99, '00 and '01. In which of those years did the national debt not increase?
75
posted on
12/19/2011 1:30:32 PM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: skeptoid
Here’s the record of the national debt over the four years you like to cite:
09/30/2002 6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 5,807,463,412,200.06
09/30/2000 5,674,178,209,886.86
09/30/1999 5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 5,413,146,011,397.34
Maybe you could point-out the surplus to me. I’m having trouble finding it.
76
posted on
12/19/2011 1:41:34 PM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: C. Edmund Wright
Yes, but Sowell as we all know is just another globalist statist Marxist RINO!!!!!!! /sYou left out "elitist" and "Beltway". /s
77
posted on
12/19/2011 1:42:55 PM PST
by
Notary Sojac
(Liberalism: Ideas so good, they have to be mandatory!!)
To: driftless2
I'm just saying I'd trust that "zany" Gingrich more than I'd trust Romney. I agree.
78
posted on
12/19/2011 2:16:40 PM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Two women in one house ... and one of 'em a redhead!)
To: Chunga
79
posted on
12/19/2011 2:30:09 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
To: skeptoid
He's the man who was totally exonerated of any wrongdoing after a four year investigation by the IRS. You know, I didn't even mention that as a "similarity" but, come to think of it, Gingrich's cover up, for which he paid a huge fine, does remind me of McCain's "Keating Five" antics.
You started out with a shovel, then you had to bring in the backhoe.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson