Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner wants new bill cutting payroll tax
Atlanta Journal and Constitution ^ | 12-18-11 | Alan Fram

Posted on 12/18/2011 6:57:56 AM PST by Yankee

WASHINGTON — House Speaker John Boehner says he opposes a Senate-approved bill extending a payroll tax cut and jobless benefits for just two months and wants congressional bargainers to write a new measure that would last an entire year.

The Ohio Republican said on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday that the Senate's two-month bill would be "kicking the can down the road." He mentioned items in the House version of the bill that were not in the Senate legislation, including restrictions on Obama administration curbs on industrial pollution.

Boehner's comments came a day after the Senate easily approved a compromise payroll tax cut bill. But in a conference call among House Republicans later Saturday, many complained bitterly about the $33 billion Senate bill, saying it lacked serious spending cuts.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: boehner; congress; gop; ohio; payrolltax; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: HenpeckedCon
An income tax cut doesn't help most of Obama’s base because they already don't pay income taxes.

Yes, that is indeed the point.

It nearly requires this to be pointed out.

21 posted on 12/18/2011 7:49:22 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
The 2 percentage point payroll tax “holiday” for employees that was enacted last year is scheduled to expire at the end of December 2011. President Obama reportedly plans to ask Congress to renew it and to provide a similar tax cut to employers. It was unwise last year to substitute the employee tax cut for the expiring Making Work Pay Tax Credit. Extending this policy by reducing the employer Social Security contribution is even worse.

I believe it was the Zero Administration that substituted the term "Payroll Tax Cut" for "Contributions to the Social Security Trust Fund" about two years ago. The politicians have hijacked the English language - with the help of their state run media - to change the way the sheeple think of their policies.

The RAT originated and sponsored Socialism Security, Medicare, and Medicaid desperately need to be overhauled, but cutting the "contributions" is not the way to start. A two month extension will do NOTHING to stimulate jobs, absolutely NOTHING.

So now we have Zero and his state run media telling us this.......If Congress doesn't act, your taxes will go up. Find out how much more you'll pay. Personally in the war of words I find a huge difference between contributing to my Social Security Trust Fund and allowing the Fed Govt to take more taxes out of my pocket at the point of a gun.
22 posted on 12/18/2011 8:06:04 AM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Give a copy to all your friends for Xmas. Send it to Ipad?


23 posted on 12/18/2011 8:06:23 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Mitchy and bonehead quietly stashed NEW taTaxes in the bill on all real estate transactions!

How many other taxes increases were quietly
Snuck in?

They financed Obamacare TOO !

These two lobbyist stooges are disaster and will lose the House at this rate!


24 posted on 12/18/2011 8:09:39 AM PST by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
The FedGuv treats it all the same,...

That may be, but it makes a world of difference politically. The 'rats created SS, over the years refer to it as your nest egg, sends you letters showing how much you've accumulated, during campaigns calls it things like "locked box", and pummels republicans on it. It's time to call out this "payroll tax cut" for what it is - a 'rat-created disaster designed to fail and go bankrupt so that they could roll out more totalitarian-socialist solutions that helps them retain power.

25 posted on 12/18/2011 8:41:10 AM PST by C210N (Dems: "We must tax you so that we can buy our votes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

THEY ARE TRYING HARD NOT TO DISCUSS THE PRIMARY ISSUE.

THIS MUST BE PAID FOR.

This payroll tax cut, this time last year, was pure stimulus. Extending it is neutral stimulus-wise, but negative deficit-wise. IT MUST BE PAID FOR WITH OTHER SPENDING CUTS. That would be de-stimulative and cut Obama’s election chances.

One other thing . . . if they do not PAY FOR THIS . . . the debt ceiling that was designed for February 2013 expiration will move up. Maybe months. I do not think they have factored that in. The debt ceiling calculations presumed this thing expired properly.


26 posted on 12/18/2011 8:42:22 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Taxes are just a shell game, they’ll reduce them there, and increase them over there.


27 posted on 12/18/2011 8:42:22 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Yankee

This is an unjust tax cut. It has Obama’s name on it. People who live on Social Security or invested retirement funds will get no tax cut, even though most retired people have suffered large cuts in income. Only those on payrolls will get it.

So, why is Boner a hero for trying to push Obama’s half of the bill and extending it? It’s nothing but more stupid Boner tricks, helping Obama get whatever he wants. Probably he’s ready to cave on putting the pipeline through, too.


28 posted on 12/18/2011 8:57:24 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

You know all taxes go into the general fund, right? And from the general fund there is not enough money to fund anything Congress has created. We are a debt based economy.


29 posted on 12/18/2011 9:37:40 AM PST by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: anoldafvet

Agree, he’s a total sell out, crybaby, sissy.


30 posted on 12/18/2011 9:38:24 AM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Principled
Instead of “payroll tax” being cut [which worsens the SS funding situation] how about an “income tax” cut?

Because the lowest 50% (in income) of taxpayers don't pay income taxes. Reducing income taxes won't benefit them at all.

For the lowest 50%, the payroll taxes (Social Security and Medicare) are the only federal taxes they pay, aside from federal excise taxes.

Now that you understand the distinction, you can easily figure out why Obama and the rest of Democrats want to reduce the payroll tax "temporarily".

But, since Social Security is already paying more benefits than it receives in payroll taxes, this makes the situation worse. So, more money must be drawn from the "general fund", which is funded by income taxes.

See above for who pays income taxes. So, reducing the payroll tax is nothing more than another form of "soak the rich".

31 posted on 12/18/2011 9:51:21 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Principled

“Unless ozero is intentionally trying to bankrupt us, that is.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Unless? I have never doubted it.


32 posted on 12/18/2011 10:04:59 AM PST by RipSawyer (This does not end well!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
There is no opportunity for your imaginary conservative dictator, to implement your heart’s desire. Time to recognize success when it shows up, and quit whining.

In may seem success at the moment, but be certain, in the end, Boehner will screw conservatives. I am under no illusion that there will be the slightest move towards Liberty. He throws crumbs to placate the foolish.

Boehner is a true enemy of our Constitution. The total sum of his actions is proof that he worships at the alter of State Power.

33 posted on 12/18/2011 10:09:07 AM PST by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

If Obama gets his “payroll tax cut” extended for the full year, he will tell Americans that HE, the all-wonderful and benevolent one, has put more money into their pockets despite stiff resistance from the Republicans who hate the middle class but love the rich and the oil companies.

It’s pure election year politics, and will do nothing to stimulate job creation or the economy. The whole thing is designed to get votes, pure and simple.


34 posted on 12/18/2011 10:10:21 AM PST by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Yankee

“This is not going to help the narrative that “Boehner caved”.”

Only because there was a big Republican Tea Party uprising in Congress. Boehner was quite happy with the deal until the uprising.


35 posted on 12/18/2011 10:16:27 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

Upon further review, you are correct.

At least it was stopped.

Limbaugh is right, conservatives have to replace the GOP establishment. It’s going to take more than one or two elections.


36 posted on 12/18/2011 10:36:48 AM PST by Yankee (ANNOY THE RNC: NOMINATE NEWT GINGRICH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Yankee

Boehner needs to be replaced with a True Conservative. Mr. Ryan step up to the plate and be House Speaker! No payroll tax extension and no extension on unemployment benefits!!!


37 posted on 12/18/2011 11:22:53 AM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yankee

“Limbaugh is right, conservatives have to replace the GOP establishment. It’s going to take more than one or two elections.”

We need to burn them out at the grassroots level. We need to watch very carefully who is taking the K Street and Wall Street payola. Why do you think many GOPers in even heavily Republican districts are not having town halls now? The answer is because they are afraid of us.


38 posted on 12/18/2011 11:40:15 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Yankee

The Senate version also gives more funding for abortion here and abroad.


39 posted on 12/18/2011 11:47:53 AM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente

“It’s pure election year politics, and will do nothing to stimulate job creation or the economy. The whole thing is designed to get votes, pure and simple.”

Exactly. Where the GOP is failing miserably is playing all these small ball games with Barry and letting him lead them from one “crisis” to the next. It totally lets the dims off the hook from the fact that they have no serious overall plan for the economy. No budget, trillion dollar deficits, union payoffs, etc.

We need to spotlight their refusal to govern responsibly but McConnell and Boehner are so busy tip toeing to 2012 that it never gets publicized.


40 posted on 12/18/2011 11:52:17 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson