McQueary said he did not provide explicit details of the March 2002 incident to Paterno but did so about 10 days later when contacted by Curley, the university's athletic director, and Schultz, the head of the school's police.
So, McQueary did not provide details to Paterno - - when he went to see him the next day - - but did provide deatils to the AD and the head of the school's police after those two finally contacted him 10 days later.
Good grief. I will cut the old man a little slack - - after all, Sandusky no longer worked for Paterno at the time, and Paterno did report his concerns to the AD and head of campus police - - but those other three need to do hard prison time.
Paterno was told a child was molested!
That is a police matter, not something to be pushed up to the AD.
Oh. So because McQueary didn't provide a "game film" of the action with a complete scouting report, ya wanna "cut" him "slack" because Joe only admitted that he "KNEW some kind of inappropriate action was being taken...with a youngster."
From the article: "I didn't push Mike... because he was very upset," Paterno said. "I knew Mike was upset and I knew some kind of inappropriate action was being taken by Jerry Sandusky with a youngster."
Tell you what, Lancey. If you ever discover "inappropriate action" is occurring against "youngsters"...perhaps your kids or grandkids...be consistent...just "look the other way" or tell others to "look the other way." Cut 'em all slack. /sad sarc