Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Attacks Romney From the Far Left
American Prowler ^ | 12.12.11 | JOSEPH LAWLER

Posted on 12/12/2011 12:02:53 PM PST by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: nickcarraway
Newt is grandstanding for the MSM. His cheap attacks will not work. Newt knows nothing about starting companies or creating money making enterprises.

Newt is a life long Washington insider. He has good ideas but lacks the self discipline necessary to be an effective candidate or an effective President.

Newt should stop trying to curry favor with the MSM and stop talking about things he doesn't understand.

Instead he should pick a few topics he is knowledgeable about and work on them.

21 posted on 12/12/2011 12:49:12 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

If the republicans supporting Romney would stop and think, it would be clear Obama is going to wage a fair-share-rich-people-are-bad campaign - and Romney and Bain will be his exhibit A. I don’t know if it will work on the republicans, but I can see it really firing up his base, and making things ugly.


22 posted on 12/12/2011 12:51:08 PM PST by true believer forever (First, they came for the rich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
It seems to me his comments were based on Romney's competency rather than an attack on capitalism.

The Newt haters are getting desperate.

23 posted on 12/12/2011 12:53:00 PM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Great tagline you have there.


24 posted on 12/12/2011 12:55:08 PM PST by truthkeeper (Vote Against Barack Obama in 2012! (That's my story and I'm sticking to it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Confab

Using government power to make money is not capitalism. The left would like us to believe it is.


25 posted on 12/12/2011 12:57:59 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

“Actually, (and I am not by any means a Newt supporter), this was actually quite intelligent of Newt. It goes a long way of explaining the Myth of Myth Romney’s vaunted and empty business acumen.”

Bain Capital is a “pump and dump” outfit. If you wan to see analog of Bain, rent “Pretty Woman” and watch Richard Gere in action. The way Bain works, the whole isn’t worth as much as the sum of its parts. In other words, pump up the stock, sell it at a profit to a bunch of dumb shlubs, then close the company in bankruptcy and sell off the parts for a profit leaving a bunch of people unemployed and get paid for doing the dirty work at a hansom profit.


26 posted on 12/12/2011 1:08:52 PM PST by vette6387 (Enough Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

“It seems to me his comments were based on Romney’s competency rather than an attack on capitalism.”

That is exactly right. However that won’t stop the Republican establishment minions here on Free Republic from making their stupid comments.


27 posted on 12/12/2011 1:16:46 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Sheesh. He was simply making a logical comparison. He wasn’t attacking or pushing for it.


28 posted on 12/12/2011 1:17:47 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Newt is a liberal progressive republican. More importantly, he is an ego maniac.


29 posted on 12/12/2011 1:29:40 PM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter from Rutland
A stupid comparison by the author. His point is valid. He crashed and burned companies purely for the profit. I was a victim of one of these, not by Bain but another. These companies were perfectly fine before getting looted by Romney and his legion of doom.

BINGO!!

30 posted on 12/12/2011 1:41:21 PM PST by CainConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vette6387
Bain Capital is a “pump and dump” outfit. If you wan to see analog of Bain, rent “Pretty Woman” and watch Richard Gere in action. The way Bain works, the whole isn’t worth as much as the sum of its parts. In other words, pump up the stock, sell it at a profit to a bunch of dumb shlubs, then close the company in bankruptcy and sell off the parts for a profit leaving a bunch of people unemployed and get paid for doing the dirty work at a hansom profit.

BINGO, II!!

31 posted on 12/12/2011 1:43:34 PM PST by CainConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Actually, he was attacking Gingrich for saying that politicians who took money from Freddie and Fannie should be thrown in jail, while Gingrich took $1.6 million to help them hook up with those politicians.

Like a guy taking money from junkies to help them find dealers, and then saying that the dealers should be thrown in jail.

And Gingrich’s response saying that laying people off at work is evil is humorous — didn’t Cain make Godfather’s profitable by laying off workers and shutting down franchises? When did that become evil? Does Gingrich think Cain should give back his salary from Godfather’s because of how he ran that business?


32 posted on 12/12/2011 1:47:45 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“Does Gingrich think Cain should give back his salary from Godfather’s because of how he ran that business?”

Does anyone care? Get a grip. You’re over thinking it. He was telling him the same thing I would tell anyone...if it ain’t illegal and it ain’t hurting you, STFU.

I don’t want Newtron to be my Daddy...I want him to kick Obama’s ass and pass the type of legislation he’s always passed...and famous for...conservative. I don’t care what he did outside of his voting record as long as it was legal.


33 posted on 12/12/2011 1:54:30 PM PST by jessduntno (The Republican elite hates him, Rove hates him, Boehner hates him, liberals hate him. It's Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

The donations F&F made to politicians weren’t illegal, but Gingrich said the politicians who got them should go to jail.

Should he be judged on his own standard? He took money from them to help them hook up with the political class. If he was worth his $1.6 million, he did an excellent job of making sure that congress wouldn’t pass laws that would impact the companies, and that’s how we ended up where we are today.

You can’t attack politicians for reacting to the work you did for a company, and not expect people to notice.


34 posted on 12/12/2011 2:01:38 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Principled
But he did frame mitten’s work in a poor light - which was not good.

The author is correct that this was channeling of OWS Far Left drivel about awful corporations that bankrupt people and turn them out into the streets in the dead of winter with threadbare socks on their unshod feet.

Newt. Please.

Moreover, there is no political equivalence between working to do normal things (leveraged buyouts) in the business world and what Gingrich did, which was take millions of dollars in fees “to build bridges to Capitol Hill Republicans and develop an argument on behalf of the company’s public-private structure that would resonate with conservatives seeking to dismantle it.”

As part of his relationship with Freddie, Gingrich also OPPOSED George Bush's 2005 efforts to strengthen regulation of these GSEs. Had Bush succeeded, the housing and subsequent economic crash might not have played out quite so badly. And maybe we would have never gotten a President Obama, either.

Nothing Mittens did worked against the conservative agenda or the nation. Gingrich's shilling for Freddie Mac did.

Newt certainly was unwise to attempt to equate his Freddie Mac consultancy with Mitt's private sector career.

35 posted on 12/12/2011 2:10:51 PM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“He took money from them to help them hook up with the political class.”

What documentation has EVER been brought forth to prove this? Any? None, huh? He was not a lobbyist. Period. And you have nothing but thin air or a lower cavity from which you could have pulled this assertion.

I thought so.


36 posted on 12/12/2011 2:15:34 PM PST by jessduntno (The Republican elite hates him, Rove hates him, Boehner hates him, liberals hate him. It's Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

“Newt is a liberal progressive republican. More importantly, he is an ego maniac.”

Impressive diagnostic skills, Dr. You must be quite impressed with yourself to do such a thorough diagnosis with no knowledge of the patient other than what you’ve read in the MSM. An average professional wouldn’t even attempt it.


37 posted on 12/12/2011 2:23:42 PM PST by jessduntno (The Republican elite hates him, Rove hates him, Boehner hates him, liberals hate him. It's Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Confab

That is a bucket of crap. Newt was peddling his influence and lobbying off his political positions. Big difference to “capitalism”.


38 posted on 12/12/2011 2:29:56 PM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: detective
He has good ideas but lacks the self discipline necessary to be an effective candidate

He's gone from dead at the gate to front runner status. Only a negatively biased viewer could call such a person an ineffective candidate.

39 posted on 12/12/2011 2:34:06 PM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

>> Newt is a duplicitous snake in the grass who can’t be trusted. He is a loose canon, and if the Pubs vote him into office, they will find that out in short order. That’s not even mentioning his obvious Napoleon complex. >>

That is some attack, demonstrating a lot of emotion and temper, very little fact, and an irrelevant personal opinion.

Care to actually add something intellectual and factual to your little rant? If not, go away.


40 posted on 12/12/2011 2:34:33 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson