Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wind Turbines add to Global Warming
Daily Telegraph ^

Posted on 12/08/2011 1:49:29 PM PST by Timocrat

A £2 million, 100 metre tall wind turbine catches fire in hurricane-force winds at Ardrossan, North Ayrshire, Scotland. The wind turbine was spinning so fast it caught fire.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Those warmists will do anything to prove their case.
1 posted on 12/08/2011 1:49:31 PM PST by Timocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timocrat; Genesis defender; golux; proud_yank; Bockscar; grey_whiskers; WL-law; IrishCatholic; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 12/08/2011 1:53:42 PM PST by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timocrat

I prefer to call them warm mongers.


3 posted on 12/08/2011 1:54:40 PM PST by Hugin ("Most time a man'll tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear"--Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timocrat

4 posted on 12/08/2011 1:58:30 PM PST by ILS21R (Never give up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timocrat

I wondered what those giant lengths of NiChrome wire running from the generators to the power station to run power from the turbines to the powerlines....


5 posted on 12/08/2011 1:58:48 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timocrat

If “the wind” - in spite of its totally dynamic and locally variable expression everywhere - represents some natural and quantifiable force in and aspect of the ‘natural’ global climate, then is it possible that the capture and diversion of that force on a massive global scale - to mechanical energy driving electric turbines, could result in unknown, and possibly massive changes in global weather patterns? /sarc

Can humans ‘fix’ a supposed outcome of one form of our massive ‘intervention’ in the globe’s climate with a means that is nothing other than a different massive intervention? /more sarc

More and more the tiny atom seems the most ‘green’ energy on the planet.


6 posted on 12/08/2011 2:00:10 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timocrat
"The engine of the giant turbine went up in flames and its blades were blackened by smoke."

Normally, I'd deride the author's technological illiteracy (calling a generator/motor an engine) -- but, I'll have to give a pass in this case. Combustion was clearly involved, so "engine" may actually be the correct term.
7 posted on 12/08/2011 2:01:48 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ILS21R

Suddenly, I find myself thinking of the Chevy Volt...


8 posted on 12/08/2011 2:03:32 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Yes. The “Green” world seems to involve a lot of external combustion.


9 posted on 12/08/2011 2:07:50 PM PST by Timocrat (Ingnorantia non excusat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ILS21R

These things are designed to work in a narrow range of wind speed. If the wind gets too low or too strong, they are supposed to self feather the vanes. Most have adjustable vanes. If these vanes were fixed it should have had a disconnect to not over rotate the generator.

The whole wind turbine deal is a fraud when you figure the site cost, build cost, maintenance and government subsidy compared to a coal, nuclear or gas generator plant.


10 posted on 12/08/2011 2:08:49 PM PST by RicocheT (Eat the rich only if you're certain it's your last meal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ILS21R

Surplus Energy Production!
ML/NJ
11 posted on 12/08/2011 2:10:13 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Timocrat
green electricity

LOL!

Tinted electricity...

12 posted on 12/08/2011 2:10:29 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
The whole wind turbine deal is a fraud when you figure the site cost, build cost, maintenance and government subsidy...

The ROI on that $3.5 million investment suddenly jumped to infinity.

13 posted on 12/08/2011 2:12:44 PM PST by Timocrat (Ingnorantia non excusat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Yup, it blowed up real good.


14 posted on 12/08/2011 2:18:10 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Combustion was clearly involved, so "engine" may actually be the correct term.

Interesting. It appears to be an internal/external combustion engine.

15 posted on 12/08/2011 2:19:04 PM PST by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

* More and more the tiny atom seems the most ‘green’ energy on the planet.*

Regular nuclear power is pretty good for energy independence, thorium nuclear is even better and safer.


16 posted on 12/08/2011 2:26:27 PM PST by PATRIOT1876 (The only crimes that are 100% preventable are crimes committed by illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
"The engine of the giant turbine went up in flames and its blades were blackened by smoke."

Isn't the engine that makes the blades turn when there's no wind? :-)

17 posted on 12/08/2011 3:06:00 PM PST by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ILS21R
Photobucket
18 posted on 12/08/2011 3:14:54 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Timocrat

“The turbine was one of 15 set up on hills overlooking the Scottish coast, built to supply green electricity to 20,000 homes.”

So, those 20,000 homes are now off the grid, right? No, of course not. Fraud.


19 posted on 12/08/2011 4:52:47 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PATRIOT1876

“thorium nuclear is even better and safer”

My reference to ‘the tiny atom’ applies to every type of ‘nuclear’ energy, thorium included; but I would not exclude any (nuclear energy sources) either. If we cannot avoid having our politicians giving a government boost to ‘energy’, nuclear is the one area I would consent to.


20 posted on 12/09/2011 12:17:51 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson