Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/07/2011 11:53:46 AM PST by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: raptor22

DC insider mud wrestling.


2 posted on 12/07/2011 11:55:59 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Nasty Pelosi and her gangster family are already filthy. And those boobs are sagging down around her waist, she needs a better bra.


3 posted on 12/07/2011 11:57:59 AM PST by Judith Anne (For rhe sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
"get"? already "is"


7 posted on 12/07/2011 12:09:34 PM PST by SparkyBass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

I’m a Newt supporter and I hate Princess Nancy as much as anyone, but I can’t help thinking that any mud-slinging contest has to hurt Newt more than it does the princess.

She’s not running for prez, he is.

But the bigger question is, if she really has something, why would she bring this up now? Why not wait until after Newt is nominated (assuming)?

The fact that she’s bringing it up now, even before Iowa, makes me think it’s all a bluff.


9 posted on 12/07/2011 12:10:51 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
"If she's suggesting she's gonna use material she developed while she was on the ethics committee, that is a fundamental violation of the rules of the House, and I would hope members would immediately file charges against her the second she does it."
That's weak, and it worries me that a) he would say it, b) he doesn't see how weak that is, c) the implication that he's not aware of the single cardinal fact in any presidential campaign: there are no secrets for Republicans.

Only Democrats can have stuff "off limits to the press". For Republicans, everything is completely open.

Newt has to realize that as a given.

13 posted on 12/07/2011 12:14:53 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Nancy will get the last word here.

Only she won’t get the credit for it.

She ran her mouth, now she has to release this a little at a time through her Media suck butts.

But: She will release it credit or not and we will know where it came from, but there isn’t a damned thing we can do about it.


14 posted on 12/07/2011 12:15:48 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22
The House ethics charges against Newt Gingrich were all politically motivated and came to nothing. The much-publicized $300,000 fine was overkill and was the result of a relatively minor infraction with no criminal intent whatsoever. Gingrich is no saint - and I'm not a supporter - but Nancy Pelosi is a classic corrupt Democrat insider that has profited nicely while 'serving' in congress. The former Speaker of the House is on very shaky legal and ethical ground with her 'warning'. However, I like Newt's in-your-face response to her snarky threat. Pelosi is not well liked by most Americans who see her as a none-too-bright, knee-jerk partisan politician. I'm sure that to some younger men, 71-year old, Botoxed Pelosie is a living example of the 'mother-in-law from hell' they worry that they may have to endure, some day. Dumb, opinionated and nasty. That's 'San Fran Nan'.
18 posted on 12/07/2011 12:20:22 PM PST by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

It’s really hard to believe Nancy is THAT stupid! Talk about opening a can of worms, throwing stones at glass houses, etc. She grew up in corruption. It’s innate.

However, there were those on here (anti-Newties) proclaiming “where there’s smoke there’s fire.” If there’s one thing about Newt’s dirty laundry background that benefits him, it’s the extent to which he was investigated by the Congress. Little new to be exposed.

Ditto the way the media went after him when he engineered the ‘94 takeover. He’s grown a thick skin. They can get as snarky and vicious as they want, it’ll be as water off a duck’s back.


19 posted on 12/07/2011 12:23:03 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

Dirt doesn’t seem to bother the old hag.


26 posted on 12/07/2011 1:17:04 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson