Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clive

“The $7 billion pipeline would transport 830,000 barrels of crude daily to the Gulf Coast, where specialized refineries process a similar product from Venezuela.”

I support the pipeline, but I have to wonder.
Maybe, just maybe, it would make more sense to build a refinery closer to the source?
Short pipeline, new refinery, for the WIN.

Gulf Coast is prone to shutdown due to severe weather, it might make sense to put a refinery or two quite a bit further inland.

NE U.S. still uses a lot of heating oil, a nearby refinery might cut transport cost.

Of course the NIMBY’s and eco-nuts have prevented any new refinery being built for decades.
Maybe the pipe line would be less offensive to them than a new refinery?

Of course we all know the real eco-nut goal is to destroy our way of life by denying us any new source of oil/energy.


18 posted on 12/02/2011 5:01:25 PM PST by Loyal Sedition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Loyal Sedition
"... it would make more sense to build a refinery closer to the source?"

I think there is at least one refinery in Kansas already gearing up to take advantage of this line.

20 posted on 12/02/2011 5:21:20 PM PST by Dust in the Wind (U S Troops Rock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Loyal Sedition
Loyal Sedition wrote:
"Maybe, just maybe, it would make more sense to build a refinery closer to the source?"
D'accord.

How about Turner Valley.


21 posted on 12/02/2011 8:26:07 PM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson