Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Crony Andy Stern: Abandon Capitalism for ChiCom Model
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | November 1, 2011 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 12/01/2011 4:11:28 PM PST by Kaslin

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Folks, just like with the communists in the Soviet Union or the ChiComs, the ultimate goal of the Democrat Party is to discourage anyone from getting anything unless it comes from The Party -- The Party equaling the government. It is precisely why Barack Obama wants to eliminate all tax deductions for charitable donations. He wants the government to take that over or The Party -- and, lo and behold, just as if they knew what was going to be interesting to me today, there is a piece in the Wall Street Journal published by Andy Stern, who used to head up the Service Employees International Union, has always been one of Obama's big fan boys. The piece is entitled, "China's Superior Economic Model."

"Mr. Stern was president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and is now senior fellow at Columbia University's Richman Center." Let me sum this up for you: Andy Stern says capitalism and free markets have been shown not to work, they are a fraud; that what we need to do is to become China. China is communist. That's what we need to do. Let me read you sections of it. "Andy Grove, the founder and chairman of Intel, provocatively wrote in Businessweek last year that, 'Our fundamental economic beliefs, which we have elevated from a conviction based on
observation to an unquestioned truism, is that the free market is the best of all economic systems -- the freer the better. Our generation has seen the decisive victory of free-market principles over planned economies.

"So we stick with this belief largely oblivious to emerging evidence that while free markets beat planned economies, there may be room for a modification that is even better.' The past few weeks have proven Mr. Grove's point, as our relations with China, and that country's impact on America's future, came to the forefront of American politics." He goes on to talk about the work that he's done with the ChiComs. He says, "The conservative-preferred, free-market fundamentalist, shareholder-only model -- so successful in the 20th century -- is being thrown onto the trash heap of history in the 21st century." The free market is being thrown on the trash heap.

"In an era when countries need to become economic teams, Team USA's results -- a jobless decade, 30 years of flat median wages, a trade deficit, a shrinking middle class and phenomenal gains in wealth but only for the top 1% -- are pathetic." That's his review and assessment. Mr. Stern ignores the 4.7% unemployment rate for much of the Bush years. After coming out of the recession and the 9/11 attacks, we had an economic boom, and unemployment... In fact, I remember when unemployment rose to about 5%, the media started talking about, "Uh-oh, we are in a recession!" At 5%, there was panic, and the Bush policies were said to be inflationary. "Oh, no!" It was a disaster.

For thee years the media tried to convince everybody we were in a recession or heading to one -- and now look! The "new normal" is 9%, 18% real unemployment. This guy, Daniel Hannan, who is the member of parliament from Britain who's on American TV quite frequently, has written a piece called "A Memo to the Occupy Wall Street Crowd." He points out to them that everything that's happened in this country since 2008 is not capitalism: Bailouts; government buying car companies; investing in phony, fraudulent green energy things. This is not capitalism that's happened in this country in the last three years! We haven't had any capitalism. And the truth of the matter is, that's why we're in the situation that we're in. We have already abandoned it with this regime.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I'm kidding you not, folks. These people will tell us who they are and what they are on occasion, like the New York Times piece on Monday and the Obama campaign having no interest in white, working class families. Here's Andy Stern in the Wall Street Journal telling us the free market system is an abject failure; it's had its run; we need to be like China. I don't know if Andy Stern is just ignorant or venal or if he's just a flat-out communist. Probably all three. You know, John Edwards ran around and talked about the two Americas. China is at least two countries. You have the rich city rats and the poor country mice. I remember for my birthday in 2009, I was a guest at the White House. I had lunch with the president, George Bush.

No, wait, it was a different occasion. It was the previous August, and I was invited to the White House. We had dinner -- the president, first lady and I -- but prior to that he and Ed Gillespie and I went to the Treaty Room, which is up in the residence quarters for about an hour and a half. The president took me around the world, told me what was going on, the flash points. When he got to China he told me a little story. He said, "I was talking to Hu Jintao, and I said, 'Hu, when you get up every day, what's the biggest challenge you've got?' and the president of China said, 'I have to keep my peasants in the country. If my peasants flood the cities, I lose control of them. I don't have the jobs in the cities for 'em. I have got to keep 'em where they are. Plus, I have to create 25 million jobs a year, but I can't let the peasants over here.'

This is what the president of the United States told me, that the ChiComs would not survive if every peasant tried to get into a city or a job 'cause they just weren't there. So now, as it turns out, you have to have a green card to move from the country to the city, and they are almost impossible to get. The Chinese peasants are almost as poor as they ever have been. The rich in China, for the most part -- the really rich that would be rich in the sense that you and I think of rich -- are trying to leave, because they are targets. No wonder Andy Stern loves this system! But the rich in China, for the most part, live lives that the worst of our poor would reject -- and I am not exaggerating. China is not a dreamland. China is a command-and-control economy.

Now, Andy Stern has a BA in Education and Urban Planning, 1971; and one of the fields of study that he looked into is one that China is probably going to ban in their colleges: urban planning. They don't want anybody to know how to do it. One example of Andy Stern's successes -- in fact, it's what made him famous and got him into the leadership of the SEIU. The SEIU started out in New York City at the turn of the century (the last century) representing doormen and superintendents, janitors and so forth in New York City buildings. In the 1980s and early nineties he started a program called Justice for Janitors. He radicalized those kinds of workers in New York City and Los Angeles who went on strike and stormed meetings and used all kinds of Alinsky-like radicals and tactics.

Now there are almost no supers in New York City buildings, they're gone. They used to get an apartment and nice salary. Now the buildings just hire illegals to do work in many cases. But you go back to China? China has probably the highest income disparity in the entire world. Poverty in China is defined as somebody earning less than a dollar $1.25 a day. You know how poverty in this country is defined: $29,500 for a family of four. Now, the philosophy in this piece, "China's Superior Economic Model," is one that we know Obama shares. Obama references China all the time. During the Olympics, Obama would constantly talk about, "You see all that urban renewal they did? You see all that infrastructure they were able to do?"

He has said on more than one occasion, "Gosh, if I was president of China, I could just wave my right hand and get anything done, but I have to go through a Congress here." He's only half joking. You remember the story of Lincoln Steffens? Lincoln Steffens said in 1919... He had just returned to America from a tour of Russia during the revolution. He said, "I have seen the future, and it works." Lincoln Steffens was a journalist. Lincoln Steffens was a liberal journalist. He was independently wealthy. He was educated. He was a journalist in the early 1900s and he loved communism and he comes back to America from seeing the Russian Revolution and says, "I have seen the future, and it works."

The irony, of course, is (beyond the fact that it didn't work was) that Lincoln Steffens repeated the quote often during his campaign throughout the United States for food aid to Russia! This guy goes to Russia, a journalist -- an independently wealthy, educated journalist goes to Russia during the revolution, comes home and says, "I have seen the future and it works! By the way, we need food aid for Russia. Americans must band together and donate food for Russians." Wait a minute, I thought the system worked. I thought you'd seen the future, and it works? So he had come to the presumably nonworking "past," the United States. He goes to Russia; he comes back to the United States (which is the "past," not "future"), and of course that's not working.

Russia, that's the future! That's the future; that's what's working. So he comes back to beg for food produced by a country he considers to be in the past and failing to be sent to "the future," Russia, that he said he had seen and it was working. The only problem was he said they couldn't figure out yet how to feed their citizens, but I've seen the future and it works. I've seen communism, and that's the way to go. I've seen it, but they just can't figure out how to feed their people. And right there you have it. And there are countless other examples of this. Neville Chamberlain, in his own way, and then of course -- I'm drawing a mental blank on the New York Times reporter who buried the details of Stalin's famine. Yeah, he got a Pulitzer for it.

It's Walter something or other. I can't remember his name off, but this guy went back and he saw the Soviet... Duranty was his name, and he went and he saw the Soviet Union. He saw it, and he lied about it. He got a Pulitzer Prize for lying about what was going on there! I can't believe how history repeats. It was just 1989 and '90, the Berlin Wall comes down. It was not that long ago that we thought we had defeated state communism, Soviet state communism, and now look where we are. I don't mean to sound hysterical here, but this has been an incredible week, folks, for what the regime is willing to admit to here. Andy Stern is Obama. I think Andy Stern, for the longest time, held the record for most Oval Office visits -- and he still might. Occupy Wall Street.

No doubt in my mind, Occupy Wall Street, one of the reasons it's falling apart is because of the Republican nomination campaign. Obama was in New York yesterday, had a fundraiser. By the way, I'm a little jealous. A hundred Occupy people showed at Obama's fundraiser; they think he's sold out now because Obama's raising money with the 1%. They feel betrayed. I only got 15 of these ragamuffins on Tuesday night at Town Hall. Obama gets a hundred of them! (interruption) Well, that's true. It was raining at mine, and these people are afraid of water. They love urine, but they're afraid of water. At any rate, theory out there wearing Guy Fawkes masks. Really, they feel betrayed Obama's raising money from the 1%.

So they're wandering aimlessly through the bowels of Manhattan trying to figure out what happened to their movement. I am convinced that the Occupy Wall Street movement is an Obama creation to destroy Romney. I think they're like everybody else in assuming Romney's gonna be the nominee, Romney is Wall Street, they can make the connection with Bain Capital. Romney loves to talk about how he was a big private sector expert, that he's not been a big government guy, and I think that now that the nomination is not apparently Romney's sewn up, there's a little confusion here. It's not falling out the way the regime intended. Nothing is. But, folks, these two stories -- and I'm sorry if you think I'm beating a dead horse, but I'm really not. They are instructive as they can be. They are as informative, educational as they can be.

The op-ed in the New York Times on Monday: Obama abandoning white, middle class voters. We don't want the votes of white working class families, and now a guy who visited the White House... Figure this now: By October of 2009, not even a full year... This number can't be right, 481 times. There's not even 365 days in a year. This guy couldn't have been there that many times. Whatever. He has set the record. He's been to the White House, Andy Stern has, hundreds of times. He's no doubt involved in strategery. Now he writes a piece -- and this is a sentiment that every leftist worth his salt holds from Walter Duranty who all these other romantic who go and find communist countries and say, "Ah, there's the future! We've seen it! It works," except it never has; and, like I said, Daniel Hannan, in a memo to the Occupy Wall Street crowd, points out: Hey, you idiots? He doesn't say that. Those are my words. You idiots running around Occupy Wall Street protesting all this stuff have no idea what you are talking about. You are not protesting capitalism -- or you are, but capitalism is not what's happened in the last three years in the United States. What's happened in the United States is not capitalism. Bailing out banks, bailing out automobile companies, all of the things that you have seen is not capitalism.

He's exactly right. Capitalism is not what's happening in this country, and here come these Occupy Wall Street people -- and who knows how many others in dire economic circumstances -- who think the problem is free markets, because that's what they believe this country is engaged in now, when of course the word "free" and "Obama" simply can't peacefully co-exist in the same sentence.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: andystern; chicoms; obamacrony
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2011 4:11:32 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I was reading this article in the WSJ becoming more and more outraged so I skipped to the end and saw it was written by Andy Stern. Of course, he would like the ChiCom economic model over American free enterprise.

The Journal must have printed it for a know thy enemy perspective.

2 posted on 12/01/2011 4:14:47 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

How a “labor leader” could praise the communist slave camp is beyond understanding, except that they are commies not labor leaders.

The left pretends to care about people, kids, workers, minorities, women, old people, etc - and it will destroy the life of every single one of them.


3 posted on 12/01/2011 4:21:15 PM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Yup, let`s emulate China:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HU4jjdRzy3w

Hong Kong - Cage Dwellers

.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqsY9eB1HD4

Breaking footage : China’s Brutal Labor Camps, Part 1
.
.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eXzLlXf2IE

Torture of Gao RongRong in the Longshan forced Labor Camp

.


4 posted on 12/01/2011 4:25:24 PM PST by Para-Ord.45 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"The President took me around the world, told me what was going on, the flash points. When he got to China he told me a little story. He said, "I was talking to Hu Jintao, and I said, 'Hu, when you get up every day, what's the biggest challenge you've got?' and the president of China said, 'I have to keep my peasants in the country. If my peasants flood the cities, I lose control of them. I don't have the jobs in the cities for 'em. I have got to keep 'em where they are. Plus, I have to create 25 million jobs a year, but I can't let the peasants over here.'

This is what the president of the United States told me, that the ChiComs would not survive if every peasant tried to get into a city or a job 'cause they just weren't there. So now, as it turns out, you have to have a green card to move from the country to the city, and they are almost impossible to get. The Chinese peasants are almost as poor as they ever have been."

This is it exactly, and it's going to happen in the next 3 years. Food riots in Beijing live on Fox.

5 posted on 12/01/2011 4:25:29 PM PST by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Two feet good, four feet bad


6 posted on 12/01/2011 4:27:08 PM PST by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

hey andeeee...no one in this country keeps people from leaving. Ever! So, if you don’t like how we do things here... get the hell out. Plain and simple. However, you would prefer the FREEDOM to say what you want, WRITE what you want, make the BIG BUCKS that you like all the while knowing you can do just that because you are in the land of the free.
Go elsewhere and try that. Go...go ahead. We certainly won’t miss you but YOU will miss the freedoms you enjoy along with the big fat paycheck you take home. Go, go now you hypocrite and... good luck.


7 posted on 12/01/2011 4:28:44 PM PST by cubreporter (Rush Limbaugh... where would our country be without this brilliant man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

The idiots never figure it out. Anyplace with a long tradition of capitalism never holds to communism for long.

Look at Vietnam. After all the blood that was shed they have a communist government but economic communism was an utter failure so they saved face by going to something called socialist oriented market economy which is capitalism with a communist friendly name. They encourage private ownership of all but a few strategic industries.


8 posted on 12/01/2011 4:34:16 PM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Another one with that "communism is the future" lie. You know what the Founding Fathers would do to someone that promoted a way of life that included centralization of all industry in state hands, abolition of private property and the family, and banning of religion in general? He'd be hung as a traitor to the USA. The same Founders that said things like "religion and morality are indispensable supports" for the US society, and that said that "(o)ur Constitution is made only for a moral and religious people" would make short work of thugs that wanted to set up state atheism and totalitarianism based on technological repression of the people.

PS. One way to make the pics fit better is to use the "align" command within the "img" tag: syntax is <img align="right" src="http://website.com/img.jpg"> (that's what I did with the pic of Washington).
9 posted on 12/01/2011 4:41:03 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Liberals sure do love their dictators.


10 posted on 12/01/2011 4:42:12 PM PST by rlmorel ("A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
The labor union movement has totally changed since I was young. They used to fight with management over money but knew darn good and well it all came from a free market economy. The AFL-CIO cooperated with Reagan to try to overthrow communism in Eastern Europe.

These new government unions are run by a bunch of socialists.

11 posted on 12/01/2011 4:47:29 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; zot; Interesting Times

A few decades ago most unions were anti-communist. here is self-admitted proof that they are now communist controlled and seek that future for the US. Will union members wake up to this or are they so indoctrinated that they are obiedently following?

Also Proof of what Obama wants for this country.


12 posted on 12/01/2011 4:48:31 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The only thing “communist” about China and Vietnam is the way they use the name to justify their authoritarian governments.


13 posted on 12/01/2011 4:48:56 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

They sure do.


14 posted on 12/01/2011 4:53:06 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Communism simply doesn’t work as an economic system. Even Cuba is starting to take baby steps in the right direction.


15 posted on 12/01/2011 4:54:36 PM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

bttt


16 posted on 12/01/2011 5:14:08 PM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Thanks for the ping. Yes, communism is the goal of those who want totalitarian power and those who want free handouts.


17 posted on 12/01/2011 5:21:15 PM PST by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I don't see how that's going to work.

If we adopt the chi-com model, who would we steal the technology from to make cheap crap to sell to them?

18 posted on 12/01/2011 5:33:00 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Wide spread corruption is part and parcel of the “China Model.”

So, no Thanks.


19 posted on 12/01/2011 5:42:50 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Chavez isn’t going to be around much longer to fund the Castros’ economic disaster. They’ll have to reform once their on their own.


20 posted on 12/01/2011 5:46:09 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson