[SoConPubbie]

I don't agree with everything Newt is saying, but I respect a politician who treats a difficult and controversial topic with the gravity required, and comes up with a workable solution. I have no doubt that this thread is going to attract plenty of anti-Gingrich spammers. I only wish that before you attack Gingrich, you name your candidate, and why you prefer his or her solution for immigration reform.

The devil is in the details with Newt's so-called plan.

Try reading the fine details.

With regards to the border fence, he wants fencing only in strategic urban areas.

Do you know how much Urban area there is along the border?

Probably less than 1/10 of 1 percent.

So in an effort to sound like he is strong on the border, he throws up, at least in this instance, a plan that leaves the status quo in place where the border fence is concerned.

[Lady Lucky]

The devil is always in details. Let’s just not have any!

[ez]

The devil is in the details with Newt's so-called plan. Try reading the fine details.

Good idea. Read Newt’s 10 step immigration plan here.

[presidio9]

Look: I get that you people are not satisfied with Gingrich. Some of you clearly hate the man. That is your right. But spamming threads with nothing but attacks and no solutions is not productive. This party his less than six weeks to come up with a viable alternative to Mitt Romney, or the music stops and that’s who we’re left with. The responsible thing to to would be to offer an alternative candidate and his or her serious alternative.

[moehoward]

"Do you know how much Urban area there is along the border? "

I guessing most of that is already fenced.....