To: SoConPubbie; Excuse_My_Bellicosity; GeronL; crz; South40; TomasUSMC; Gator113
Look: I get that you people are not satisfied with Gingrich. Some of you clearly hate the man. That is your right. But spamming threads with nothing but attacks and no solutions is not productive. This party his less than six weeks to come up with a viable alternative to Mitt Romney, or the music stops and that’s who we’re left with. The responsible thing to to would be to offer an alternative candidate and his or her serious alternative.
29 posted on
11/26/2011 1:26:28 PM PST by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does.)
To: presidio9; Excuse_My_Bellicosity; GeronL; crz; South40; TomasUSMC; Gator113
Look: I get that you people are not satisfied with Gingrich. Some of you clearly hate the man.
The last refuge of someone losing an argument, the Hate card.
If you are going to accuse us of "Hating" Newt, at least do us the courtesy of proving your point by posting the occasions where we have shown we hate him.
To: presidio9
My remark was no more spam than are the repeated efforts of the pro-amnesty crowd to push Newt Gingrich and his amnesty scheme.
And I don't hate Newt. When you say something like that you sound like a liberal who says we hate Obama because we don't like his politics. We can oppose the man w/o hating him.
Free Republic is about promoting and defending conservatism, not the liberal position of amnesty. If you continue posting pro-amnesty pieces conservatives will continue rebuking them. Get used to it.
34 posted on
11/26/2011 1:32:42 PM PST by
South40
(Just say NO to amnesty. Say NO to Newt!)
To: presidio9; SoConPubbie; Excuse_My_Bellicosity; GeronL; crz; South40; TomasUSMC; Gator113
That is your right. But spamming threads with nothing but attacks and no solutions is not productive.
Now you are either suffering with a bad case of no reading compreshension, or not reading the posts you are referring to, or just plain lying, but on ALL of the threads there is always at least one reference to solutions that will actually work without conservatives compromising on their principles. On this thread alone I have posted multiple times the solution to this problem:
1. Enforce existing laws
2. Implement E-Verify for all positions of employment and for all acquisition of Social Services
3. Build the COMPLETE PHYSICAL border wall
This works, Newt's plan does not and is just another version of capitulation to Illegal Immigration.
To: presidio9
That’s a typical LIBERAL argument: “if you disagree with a person, then you hate them.”
And don’t even unload that lofty load of crap about spamming the threads. Anybody who disagrees with you is putting out “spam”? You clearly don’t know what the term means. Hit the ‘Abuse’ button if a person is posting unsolicited advertisements. And you’d do well to take your RINO can down the road.
To: presidio9
“But spamming threads with nothing but attacks and no solutions is not productive”
Pointing out how Newt is fibbing on illegals isn’t an attack and as far as solutions go, not voting for scum is mine.
248 posted on
11/27/2011 5:07:25 AM PST by
KantianBurke
(Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson