Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate To Vote On Legislation That Allows U.S. Military to Detain Americans Without Charge or Trial
The SHTF.com ^ | 25 Nov, 2011 | Mac Slavo

Posted on 11/25/2011 3:06:35 PM PST by Errant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Errant

I looked at the ACLU site regarding the Defense Act and was astounded by the number of amendments. What a mess! It would take a month of Sundays to go through all of them.


41 posted on 11/25/2011 5:20:44 PM PST by Jukeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Errant
You want to make war against this country you've given up the protections of the court ~ you become a TARGET.

I know it's a bummer of a thing to happen, but that's the way war is conducted, and if the gub'mnt cain't do it, then we citizens need to be authorized to carry it out as we see fit.

Lak' ah said, they's dead meat!

Yah heyah?

42 posted on 11/25/2011 5:20:53 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Errant

“Hope you’re right sergeant...”

I am right, Errant. Levin is my Senator, and the fat, commie slob hasn’t had the guts to show his fat, commie face in my congressional district for 18 years. I live in hard-core, rural gun country. He’s scared shitless. This legislation is nothing more than a feel-good law to make Levin believe he has some modicum of the military to protect his fat, useless life.

He doesn’t.

Cheers, FRiend.


43 posted on 11/25/2011 5:26:29 PM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: djf

Looky here, Defense money for HILLARY TO SPEND:

“SEC. 1207. GLOBAL SECURITY CONTINGENCY FUND.

(a) Establishment- There is established on the books of the Treasury of the United States an account to be known as the `Global Security Contingency Fund’.
(b) Authority- Amounts in the Fund shall be available to either the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Defense, notwithstanding any other provision of law, to provide assistance to countries designated by the Secretary of State, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense...
Funds available to the Department of State for foreign assistance may be transferred to the Fund by the Secretary of State. Funds available to the Department of Defense may be transferred to the Fund by the Secretary of Defense in accordance with established procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 of this Act and successor provisions of law. Amounts transferred under this paragraph shall be merged with funds made available under this section and remain available until expended as provided in subsection (i) for the purposes specified in subsection (b).
(2) LIMITATION- The total amount of funds appropriated and transferred to the Fund in any fiscal year shall not exceed $300,000,000. This limitation does not apply to amounts contributed to the Fund under subsection (h)...
(h) Authority To Accept Gifts- The Secretary of State may use money, funds, property, and services accepted pursuant to the authority of section 635(d) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2395(d)) to fulfill the purposes of subsection (b).”


44 posted on 11/25/2011 5:28:06 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Tll that to the two AMericans killed recently by the missle strike.

And I know and agree with what you are saying, but Rush has spoken twice on his show about this panel and that here is NO oversight whatsoever......So if you want to agrue call Rush...


45 posted on 11/25/2011 5:30:44 PM PST by stockpirate (Real hero's don't wear capes, they wear dog tags.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Errant

WAR is “due process of law”. It always was and always will be.


46 posted on 11/25/2011 5:38:43 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Well, dear friends, if a military panel can presently declare the death penalty upon a declared terrorist, does it not stand to reason it would take only one small step to do the same to our citizenry. Actually that step has already been in effect much longer than any of us would like to believe. Perhaps not in a constitutional manner but it has been taken nonetheless. We know that under Obama, in particular, the U.S. Constitution has been dismissed as have the laws and court decisions they wish to disregard. Most any area of laws, regulations and tradition affecting this republic has been violated by the Obama administration. I am no legal or constitutional scholar but common sense and casual observance tell me this.


47 posted on 11/25/2011 5:44:18 PM PST by Jukeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE

You say it’s a low volume ping. I’m surprised really. Didn’t know you had this ping until now, but seems to me there’s one “H” of a lot more involvement with agenda 21 than people think. The UN IS the major tool of the Marxists since its inception, and the Marxists are on the march Worldwide right now, today.

IMO just about everything we suffer today is related to the UN agenda for the 21st Century, or indirectly so. Right down to local community confusion.

Yeah put me on that list please. Appreciate it.


48 posted on 11/25/2011 5:45:34 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanAbroad

No, the bill’s not as described.
Yes.things have gotten worse here. Some government oddicial is involved in more aspects of our life than ever. But viewing it from overseas it must look worse than it is.

Not ironic to me at all. Freedoms are new in the Czech Republic, old in America- and familiarity breeds contempt (sigh...).


49 posted on 11/25/2011 5:47:17 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Drafted in secret.....Carl Levin, and John McCain eh.

Wouldn’t doubt it.


50 posted on 11/25/2011 5:47:52 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jukeman

sfl


51 posted on 11/25/2011 5:52:48 PM PST by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: garybob

Never underestimate the power of stupidity when it comes to holders of political office they are politicians not statesmen. The difference is profound.


52 posted on 11/25/2011 5:57:16 PM PST by Nebr FAL owner (.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Errant

It seems like the Oathkeepers may be America’s last line of defense, refusing to carry out unconstitutional orders against American citizens.

That is, assuming that each and every one of them that signed on isn’t immediately RIF’ed, because of “budget cutbacks”. Makes you wonder how many American soldiers are willing to “obey orders” and fire on American civilians?


53 posted on 11/25/2011 5:58:16 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate; muawiyah
I was just being sarcastic to emphasize the point you were making...

It's astounding to me that so many in Washington, who have sworn to uphold the constitution, can look the other way rather than put up a fuss.

No doubt that these individuals deserved what they got. As citizens according to our law, their faith should have been decided by a court (even if in absence) instead of by some secret panel and current resident of the WH.

The Rubicon crossed, we're marching to Rome with a new set of rules.

54 posted on 11/25/2011 6:05:02 PM PST by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

“Makes you wonder how many American soldiers are willing to “obey orders” and fire on American civilians?”

I can tell you from my perspective - Levin is my senator and I’m a sergeant - that the overwhelming majority of American troops are willing to fire on that traitorous SOB.

Sleep well, FRiend. We got you covered.


55 posted on 11/25/2011 6:18:47 PM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Errant
It's best to just shoot them down on sight in a war. No sense dragging them into court where some judge might just cut them loose.

Then what would you have ~ well, it'd be a combatant running about loose who wanted to kill you.

The Fifth Amendment is for criminals ~ not for enemy combatants.

56 posted on 11/25/2011 6:21:33 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
WAR is “due process of law”. It always was and always will be.

Used to be declared as such. Now we have WOT that allows for considerable mission creep.

Circumventing the supreme law of the land, secret panels and our dear leader are deciding whether citizens are patriots or terrorists and then deciding and applying the penalty.

So here we have Congress considering allowing indefinite detention of those deemed a threat by those in power.

You don't see a problem here?

57 posted on 11/25/2011 6:33:17 PM PST by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Posse Comitatus.

Not that the law means anything to America’s leaders anymore.


58 posted on 11/25/2011 6:46:17 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Errant
And, the correct magic words for DECLARATIONS OF WAR as specified in the Constitution are:__________________________?

And what are the magic words when THEY attack us first?

59 posted on 11/25/2011 6:55:48 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: kalee

Well I’m glad to hear it because it was reported all over the place that the kid was being held incognito for months.

Sounds like he got just about the right punishment for the crime.


60 posted on 11/25/2011 8:47:58 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson