Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debate Flashback: When Bachmann Supported A Non-Deportation Approach To Illegal Immigration
Townhall ^ | 11/25/2011 | Greg Hengler

Posted on 11/25/2011 12:41:43 PM PST by TBBT

Congresswoman Bachmann appears to be conveniently forgetting her own views on immigration in order to score political points. During the presidential debate at the Reagan Library on September 7, she said she won't deport all 11 million illegal immigrants here in the United States.

[Full transcript]

HARRIS: A quick 30-second rebuttal on the specific question. The fence is built, the border is under control. What do you do with 11.5 million people who are here without documents and with U.S.- born children?

BACHMANN: Well, that's right. And again, it is sequential, and it depends upon where they live, how long they have been here, if they have a criminal record. All of those things have to be taken into place.

Sounds almost identical to Newt's position that once we secure the border first, we can have a humane enforcement policy vis-a-vis some of those remaining.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bachmann
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last
To: Conservativegreatgrandma

Remember Obama’s Aunt Zetuni, the illegal alien leach poster child. She came here from Kenya, went right to the welfare office and ended up living in a nice subsidized apartment in Boston. Along with the free apartment, there had to have been other freebies such as a welfare check. It was only a fluke that Aunt Zetuni was exposed and that was only because she was Obama’s relative but how many ordinary illegals are doing the same thing? We have been far too naive about illegals even among many Republicans.


101 posted on 11/25/2011 7:30:39 PM PST by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RainMan

FRiend, I’m at a bit of a loss here. Who do you mean by “Your candidate’’ exactly? Do you mean me? If so, I haven’t endorsed anybody yet. I’m not too sure about Newt, he’s hit the right notes on some things but this latest statement about illegals and a kind of amnesty , quite frankly I’m not in favor of it.Nor have I ever said we need new immigration laws, we need to enforce the ones already on the books ILLEGAL is ILLEGAL! What part of that doesn’t anyone, including Newt not understand? Enforce the damn law as it is. And as a point of fact, the president doesn’t enforce the law, Congress does. Read the Constitution.


102 posted on 11/25/2011 7:47:18 PM PST by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Hopefully Americans will start to realize that they have been made irrelevant by the Democrats betrayal and will move sharply to the Republican side in time to save the country. There are still lots of Americans who are foolishly wasting their votes on Democrats. Also, I think that Republicans should make overtures to immigrant groups such as Asians and Indians who share many of our values. If we emphasized the things we share in common such as a strong work ethic, strong family structure and respect for the law, we could make inroads with these groups. We should not concede these groups to the Democrats who have little in common with these traditional people.
103 posted on 11/25/2011 8:05:36 PM PST by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

There is no need to deport the vast majority of illegals. We can establish policies that cause them to self deport.

Alabama did this, and it worked.


104 posted on 11/25/2011 8:26:57 PM PST by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Jmac

I was not addressing you specifically, but the thread in general. Newt is not proposing new immigration laws, he is proposing we enforce what we have.

BTW, how praytel does Congress enforce the law. Last I checked, the Secretarys of the different departments were part of the Presidents Cabinet. They may be confirmed by the Senate but that does not mean that Congress is who enforces the law. Congress has oversight on the purse strings, creation of laws, and of course to prosecute misconduct of these govenrment officials.

The President owns all the enforcement agencies. This includes positions such as Justice (Attorney General of the US), and defense of laws in front of the SC (Solicitor General of the US) as well as the police type agencies such as FBI, CIA, DHS, Customs and Border Patrol, Treasury (Secret Service) and of course, the Military. The branch that makes the law does not enforce the law. This is why the most important title of the President is Commander in Chief. Why/How do you think Congress enforces law?


105 posted on 11/25/2011 10:12:43 PM PST by RainMan (Newt - An actual plan that solves illegals without amnesty, unlike your candidate. Gingrich/Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: South40

I am not pushing amnesty. I don’t believe in open borders. I believe in human respect. Newt Gingrich was not pushing amnesty either just respect for family values which is a conservative value in case you didn’t know. Maybe you belong on a liberal kook site.


106 posted on 11/26/2011 12:28:06 PM PST by Maryhere ("HE comes to rule the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Maryhere
Newt Gingrich was not pushing amnesty either

If it involves allowing ILLEGAL aliens to stay her legally it is amnesty.

It does, it is and you are.

107 posted on 11/26/2011 12:33:39 PM PST by South40 (Just say NO to amnesty. Say NO to Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: EagleInGA
“Newt based his amnesty proposal on some argument that a party that stands for family values should have a “humane” approach to granting certain illegals the right to stay in the states as LEGALS.”

NO, that was in response to Michele Bachmann

108 posted on 11/27/2011 5:22:49 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson