Rush Limbaugh Exposes the Elephant in the Closet

Townhall.com ^ | 11/21/2011 | Michael Brown

[servo1969]

Rush Limbaugh has now confirmed what I wrote last week, explaining to a caller on Friday, November 18th that the elephant in the room in the Penn State scandal was that the alleged pedophile acts committed by Jerry Sandusky were homosexual in nature.

So much for those who scorned the suggestion, and kudos to Rush for speaking his mind.

Here’s the relevant background. On November 15th, two of my articles were posted online, “The Pedophile Elephant in the Gay Activist Closet” and “What Could End Rush Limbaugh’s Career?”

In the first article I stated that, “I personally believe that the great majority of homosexual men also deplore Sandusky’s alleged acts. At the same time, there is a very large pedophile elephant that is hiding in the gay activist closet.” (I was referring to the celebration of pederasty in gay history, along with the fact that a number of 20th century gay icons supported NAMBLA, the notorious North American Man Boy Love Association.)

As for Rush, I drew attention to a statement he made to a caller on November 8th about Penn State, namely, that, “Nobody has the guts to actually give the explanation for what was going on and why there was trepidation in reporting it, and that’s all I’ll say.”

In response to this I asked, “Could it be that the sex abuse scandal involved a man abusing boys, meaning that the acts were homosexual in nature? . . . Of course, the fact that there are homosexual pedophiles does not mean that all (or most) gays are child abusers. Certainly not! And yet even Rush Limbaugh, it appears, would not address this directly.”

[Boogieman]

Reminds me of the old joke websites, Pen Island (penisland.com) and Therapist (therapist.com).

[moehoward]

"There are more hetorosexual molesters then gays one, though the caveat is important......there are more (exponentially more) straights then gays. "

True, in plain numbers. But It's the percentage of offenders in each group that's most telling. It's much high in the gay community. In fact, I'm not at all certain it's even considered abuse unless it's blatant rape.

[Sonny M]

True, in plain numbers. But It's the percentage of offenders in each group that's most telling. It's much high in the gay community. In fact, I'm not at all certain it's even considered abuse unless it's blatant rape.

True, its why percentages are more important. Unfortunately for political reasons, the data is very mukry, and not just due to the pro-gay crowd.

Underage girls who get pregnant often go for abortions, and orgs like planned parenthood will often obscure the relevant info (hiding or blurring many cases, destroying evidence, protecting rapists and those who commit incest, etc.).

I have no doubt that the percentage of molesters is higher on the other side of the line, there is a reason gay rights groups consider lowing the age of consent to be a part of their agenda. That said, the true numbers and percentages will always be a mystery, but heterosexual molestation is not that rare unfortunately, its just very hidden, by the various special left wing orgs to protect an industry that profits from it.