Posted on 11/20/2011 3:59:02 PM PST by FreeKeys
“Workers of the World Unite”
Karl Marx, the infamous German political philosopher had a vision. Marx, together with Joseph Engles predicted and even called for the dismantling of capitalist economic systems worldwide into a socialist and ultimately classless communist World. 24thState will be asking the question of the late Mr. Marx, “How is that working out for you?”
CP USA
In a series of columns, we will expose the 5th column in the United States. We will name names and expose the ties from David Axelrod, who just visited St. Louis referring to some GOP presidential contenders as “nutty folks“, to active Marxists and communist party loyalists in Congress and even the Missouri General Assembly. We will expose their plans and how even their favorite Republican member of Congress (yes, they have one) works to fulfill them.
If we contemplate for a second, whether it is realistic to assume that the marxists quit being marxists, in Russia, China and even the U.S., can we assume that the workers of the world decided to not unite? Did they pack up their tents and go home? Are Russian and Chinese leaders relinquishing power and creating new constitutional republics? Did the Communist Party USA shut their doors or just change their tactics? The answers to these questions are unquestionably obvious but uncomfortable to contemplate.
First published in 1848, the Manifesto had ten very specific goals (briefly examine their progress in the U.S. here). The most alarming tenet however, may be the assertion that communism will never really work until the entire World is communist. In other words, the true believers have a duty to spread it. What then is the duty of those opposed to it? What is IT?
Another alarming tenet of Marxism is the Machiavellian notion that the idea is so important and people so naturally resistant, that deception, propaganda and assorted treachery are not just hallmarks, but mandates. The history of their “class struggle” shows us their conviction that some must die. We wonder if Marx and Engels would have desired that upwards of 100 million should die. When you add up the slaughter of the “less useful” of the “useful idiots” in the lexicon of the Leninists, we have over 35 million human beings “sacrificed” for the cause in Russia alone. Add in Pol Pot, Castro, Chairman Mao and the estimated 3.5 million dead and still dying daily in North Korea, utopia has what most of us would view as one unacceptably high price. Some evidently are so untroubled by that legacy that they seek to spread the ideology of death despite the clear and modern existence of communist regimes like North Korea which kills people daily. Where are the calls of the marxists of the world for North Korea to stop killing people? Where are the calls of the leftists in Congress to China to stop paying bounties on escaped North Koreans who are sent back to die? The deafening silence is the natural sign of an allied relationship. The hard leftists view China as the partner.
If you ask a naval admiral who he or she fears the most, you will here it is China. The backwards Marxist state turned economic super power also has the most treacherous anti-ship missile known to man. Their spies have surpassed the Russians in both U.S. Government and corporate espionage. Worse, China and Russia have formed a military alliance even bringing Pakistan into their military alliance; the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.
So if Russia and China are the first two columns allied against us, East and West, and Cuba and Venezuela make up the third column, certainly radical Islam is the fourth. We know that they work together allying against our interests around the World, against any civil, peaceful nation that is not communist or radicalized Islamist. So could the U.S. suffer a fifth column? Of course we could. Is it radical Islamic terror cells, Marxists, or both? If they are here, what goals would they have? Disarming us, maybe?
So while we bask in the blissful ignorance that the Cold War is over and China is our friendly neighborhood banker ever since Nixon went there, the Islamists, and communists among us are working for “change“. What are they changing? We know that the Democrats had two non-negotiable demands out of the failed budget deal: tax increases and military decreases. Do we have your attention yet?
"It's the enemedia." - Fred Nerks
>>>If obama and the Dems win in 2012, realize that not only will the GOP be extinct, but we will have a guaranteed depression, capital and productive people leaving the US, blood in the streets and secession movements. Obama will usher in a vicious police state and rule as a dictator by executive order/decree. We will never be able to peaceably restore our republic.<<<
Well, I agree with you, except for the last part. Restoration will occur in those parts of the United States where there are still people committed to the ideals of the American experiment. The rest will be left to hang separately, I suppose. I would think that the bloodshed and slaughter will occur in some locations - those places already controlled by the left - and it will be tough for them to work their way outside of those enclaves to the rest of us. Sort of like the Paris Commune, plus the French Revolution, with a little Pol Pot throw in for good measure. I can’t see the military throwing itself in with the left, although some police forces might, and certainly the leftist militias like the Black Panthers. The rest of us will see it and weep. In the end, the areas restored to the Constitutional republic will probably require all sorts of obligations and safeguards for other parts of the old United States to reform the union, and some places will be forever lost. And maybe some places will be gained - it would cool to have Alberta as a new state.
The other sad part of this prophecy is that the world will collectively go to hell with terrifying speed once the Americans are fighting among themselves. After that, I would imagine they’ll beg our return.
The fourth estate IS the fifth column.
I pray there is not a reckoning. If there is, it will be ugly...very ugly.
5.56mm
Any idea on who their “favorite Republican member of Congress” is or do we have to wait on the next column?
The terms Communist, Progressive and Liberal as used by the left, all mean the same thing. Let me explain why. Carl Marx in 1848 finished writing and then published the Communist Manifesto. Over the next 30 to 40 years the book gained some followers, mostly self anointed elites with PHDs. ( Now there is a subject worth some grant money. Why are highly educated people with PHDs so susceptible to such an absurd philosophy.) As people became aware of their agenda, the communists picked the term progressive in an attempt to hide that agenda. Years later, the same problem, too many people have spotted the agenda again so they picked the term liberal. ( Note that the dictionary definitions of progressive and liberal are very far removed from the political definitions.)
One of the goals of their agenda is to infiltrate and take control of both major political parties. The Democrat party is at this time wholly controlled, 90% to 95%. The Republican party is 40% to 45% controlled. This leaves WE THE PEOPLE with very little true representation inside the belt way.
If we want to survive, as a nation, as a republic, we must flush the progressives from both parties, from all government offices, from the media, from positions of instruction, both public schools and universities. The progressive political philosophy must be rendered ineffectual, laughable, an object of ridicule. The progressive must be excoriated and driven out of any position of authority. Any adherent of such an absurd idea should never be paid more than minimum wage.
In a brief spasm of vigilantism, shooting or hanging fifteen too twenty thousand progressives would end their agenda for at least two hundred years.
Thanks for the post; comments. OUTSTANDING! Thanks to every poster. BTTT!
Tell 'em, brother !
media = enemy
I do think agree with your assessment. It may be possible to resurrect some semblance of a Constutional republic in parts of a divided US, but it will never be anything like it was before. If zero is re-elected, the secessionist principle will be the only thing between the individual and the boot of despots. Some sherrifs and governors might stand up to the feds, and this movement could gain momentum, but only the Lord knows how something like this would turn out.
Thanks for the reply... yeah, we’re in for rough times. National collapse has happened many times in history, and it could happen here. God help us.
UN and Obama, Hillary same globalist view
It's simple. The leaders of CP USA managed to install CHILDREN of their own into the executive branch of this government.
Valerie Jarrett (the 'brains' behind the telepromter) is the daughter-in-law of Vernon Jarrett, who was a leader in the CP USA. The elder Jarrett worked with and was close friends of Frank Marshall Davis, another CP USA member; and he was Obama's mentor; the man he referred to as Uncle Frank.
...and possibly Mr. Obama’s real father...
Thanks for the reminder. Thread BUMP!
Then uses its media companies to spread the government's propaganda.
Wonder what technology they have also transferred to China.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
