Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/20/2011 5:38:36 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: BarnacleCenturion

Gingrich has been on all sides of all issues.


2 posted on 11/20/2011 5:40:36 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

I agree with her about Gingrich’s failure to provide equal protection for all, as the oath of office requires.

And yet, she too supports legislation that ends with “and then you can kill the baby.”


3 posted on 11/20/2011 5:40:38 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Nutritionally, you are what you eat. Politically, you are what you endorse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

‘We will in fact be responsive to changing circumstances,’ Gingrich said, citing polls that gauge which abortion restrictions are favored by the public.” (Associated Press, 3/9/1990)


4 posted on 11/20/2011 5:45:05 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

I sure hope the people of Iowa vote strongly in support of our Lady in the Race to be President.


5 posted on 11/20/2011 5:45:10 AM PST by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

What makes me think that Bachmann - and Santorum for that matter -are not very smart is how they are running this campaign.

Any dolt can stand back and see that the way to the top is to be the most effective at attacking big government and liberals in general and the media and Obama in specific.

And yet, like desperate little kids not getting love on the playground, Bachmann and Santorum keep attacking other candidates on the notion that they are not socially conservative enough.

Get a clue folks: our problem is Obama and liberal big government. And understanding that is the way to the top of the heap. No one has gained any traction in this whole race by attacking other people in the field.
No one.


6 posted on 11/20/2011 5:48:41 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Forget Gingrich, Cain is my man!


7 posted on 11/20/2011 5:53:29 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Cain 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

I like Bachmann when she’s attacking Obama. Not so much when she’s attacking other Republican candidates who are not Mitt Romney.


13 posted on 11/20/2011 6:04:21 AM PST by Lady Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion
Just to be safe, we need to do everything we can to get as many Tea Partiers elected to Congress as possible as a hedge against a RINO like Romney who won't hesitate for a second to poke us in the eye every chance he gets or a go-along-to-get-along Republican like Newt.

Even if we Bachmann wins, she'll need an army of Tea Partiers to help her pass whatever agenda she has.

What is her agenda, by the way?

This is what bugs me about this race so far. Instead of bashing each other, these people should be advancing their ideas. That's what we're looking for; something to vote for, not someone to vote against.

15 posted on 11/20/2011 6:07:57 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion
Newt makes a living doing what he is paid to do, the man has no morals, and his god is money, with a sprinkle of young women.
21 posted on 11/20/2011 6:12:50 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion
This is what turns me off on Michele. She's like the old media, she'll snap at everyone but Mitt.
23 posted on 11/20/2011 6:17:30 AM PST by Tribune7 (Perry, Cain or Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

I like Michele Bachmann, but her attack on Newt Gingrich on this issue is a bit misleading.

Cutting off funding for Planned Parenthood would have meant an automatic veto by Bill Clinton, even assuming the Dems didn’t block the funding cut-off in the Senate, which they probably would have done. Look what happened when the current Congress tried to cut off Planned Parenthood funding. Are all the Republicans in the House therefore RINOs? No, of course not.

Overall, Newt compiled a solidly pro-life record in Congress. Just look at how pro-life and pro-abortion groups rated him:

1997-1998 National Right to Life Committee - 100%
1997 National Right to Life Committee - 100%
1996 National Right to Life Committee - 100%
1993-1996 Planned Parenthood - 0%
1997 NARAL Pro-Choice America - 0%


24 posted on 11/20/2011 6:18:15 AM PST by bobtaftfan (Pro-Life Groups Gave Newt High Marks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: deoetdoctrinae
FRiends help FRiends

PLEASE GIVE FROM YOUR HEART


Click the Pic
Help close out this FReepathon


Support Free Republic

25 posted on 11/20/2011 6:21:33 AM PST by deoetdoctrinae (Gun-Free zones are playgrounds for felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

I’d be happy if they just stop tax-payer funding of all abortions and stop all late term abortions. That would be progress.

I like Newt’s idea of congress defining “personhood” which would take care of all the legislation, like Roe v Wade.


29 posted on 11/20/2011 6:23:43 AM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

At this point it’s like a mosquito trying to bring down an elephant.


31 posted on 11/20/2011 6:25:46 AM PST by Grunthor (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0heL2Czeraw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

I am FOR Bachmann but she needs not to attack.... BUT INSPIRE..

She “should” lay out a better course to inspire toward a graduated “killing” of the federal “MONSTER”..
She started the “monster hunt” to kill the dragon...
Gingrich, Perry, AND Cain just got on the bandwagon...

These “jackwagons” are just threateners.. SHE is the actual “Grizzly Momma”..
She “should” ATTACK the Federal Beast not the Monte Python Knights in their armour..

If she were “smart” she would use the Monte Python Knights(Newt, Rick and Hermie) as cannon fodder..

Because she is “really” the ONLY conservative in the bunch..
Cain worked for the federal reserve.. an elite position.. for the elite..
And Newt and Rick have proven to get along quite well with democrats..


35 posted on 11/20/2011 6:28:14 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion; mickie
Bachmann is in the death throes of defeat, wildly lashing out at her fellow GOP candidates on her way down.

If she were truly smart, she'd drop out with grace.....and support her favorite primary candidates.....and maybe she'll get an appointment in a future GOP presidency as Ambassador to Upper Snarkovia, or sumpin'.

Leni

38 posted on 11/20/2011 6:35:29 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I’m sorry but it is nonsense to insists on thread after thread you are “vetting” this candidate or that then turn around demand your candidate of choice be immune from the same attention.


43 posted on 11/20/2011 6:43:35 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

I need a truly pro-life candidate this time around. I’m sick of the Pro-life in name only candidates....PLINOS :) How far have we really come by electing pro-life moderates in preventing the murder, or even drastically reducing the murder of a million plus babies EVERY year? It’s done nothing but we still hold up wobbly armed “pro-life” candidates because they are willing to push for less abortions than democrats. I am guilty of falling into that trap of the lesser of two evils voting myself. So, to all you RINO candidates out there...either stand up for our smallest members of society or go take a hike.

As for Gingrich, he did become a Catholic a couple of years ago so maybe he might be 100% pro-life now. I’m willing to give him the chance to make that statement and promise true defense of all in the womb.


45 posted on 11/20/2011 6:52:39 AM PST by MiddleEarth (With hope or without hope we'll follow the trail of our enemies. Woe to them, if we prove the faster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Newt spent a half billion of our dollars assisting in killing babies and we want this turd for President? Really? Some FREEPERS are really becoming liberal.


54 posted on 11/20/2011 7:27:05 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion
and his Republican-dominated House never voted to bar taxpayer funding to this largest U.S. abortion provider.

You know, Bachmann is really starting to annoy me. First she jump on the bandwagon on the lies about Cain's abortion stance, then she throws this crap out there. During the years that she is claiming nothing was done, it was actually known as the most pro-life congress ever. It may be good to remind her that Congress voted on several major pro-life bills that Clinton vetoed. That Congress also voted several times to eliminate Title X- a major controversy at the time. Maybe being a tax lawyer at the time, she wasn't paying attention.

Some sources.

http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=AASB&p_theme=aasb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EA213D497A005D1&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=L1JaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=s0wNAAAAIBAJ&pg=7030,3175475&dq=congress+planned+parenthood&hl=en

http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DP&p_theme=dp&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EAF44426533C958&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=oTpHAAAAIBAJ&sjid=bekMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2788,71406&dq=congress+planned+parenthood+defund&hl=en

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/bostonherald/access/20511262.html?dids=20511262:20511262&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=May+22%2C+1995&author=Don+Feder&pub=Boston+Herald&desc=Social+contract+written+on+wind&pqatl=google

85 posted on 11/20/2011 8:08:09 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson