Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Tax her........
1 posted on 11/17/2011 11:20:33 AM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Sub-Driver

pelozi could be prosecuted...NO law exempting!...
http://www.breitbart.tv/law-prof-pelosi-could-be-prosecuted-under-existing-insider-trading-law/


2 posted on 11/17/2011 11:22:20 AM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Hell is TOO GOOD for this Female DOG!


3 posted on 11/17/2011 11:22:34 AM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

How about a 100% tax on the loot Pelosie got from Visa?


4 posted on 11/17/2011 11:23:06 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Pelosi to supercommittee Republicans: Tax the rich or I’ll shoot this kitten!


5 posted on 11/17/2011 11:24:16 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

couldn’t be more predictable. happy boehner?


6 posted on 11/17/2011 11:24:32 AM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

How about Pelosi returning the insider trader money she got per 60 Minutes?

Corruption thy name is DC politician(s).


7 posted on 11/17/2011 11:25:41 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Cut out the f 35 and say your move bitch.


8 posted on 11/17/2011 11:26:07 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Oh, no...

By “the rich”, she doesn’t mean the actual WEALTHY,
she means you amd me... the people who have some savings and property earned from hard work,

and this is the same “the rich” that they will gin up absolute HATRED for when the crash comes, deflecting blame from themselves.


9 posted on 11/17/2011 11:27:52 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

REPUBs to Pelosi,

Close two gov. agencies to keep the country’s integrity?


10 posted on 11/17/2011 11:29:04 AM PST by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I agree, let’s tax the heck out of all rich RATS!


11 posted on 11/17/2011 11:29:35 AM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Republicans made a very bad deal with this super committee and trigger cuts. The idea that defense should take half of the reductions is ridiculous. Defense is the core function of government. I also think that failure to agree involves the expiration of the Bush tax rates although I may be mistaken on this point. Democrats have more bargaining power in the super committee so I expect that Republicans will cave or deal with large reductions in the defense budget.


12 posted on 11/17/2011 11:31:59 AM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I thought the Supercommittee was charged to find cuts in exchange for raising the debt ceiling. Whatever happened to that deal? Where did tax hikes come from?


13 posted on 11/17/2011 11:33:05 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Let’s see the congressional Democrats demonstrate real leadership. Let every demo senator and congressperson who is worth more than $1 million give up one half to the federal treasury, everyone who is worth more than $10 million give up three quarters to the treasury, and everyone who is worth more than $50 million give up 90%. As this is being calculated make sure all spousal assets are included, all overseas assets, and all currently tax-sheltered assets. Eliminate all loopholes to them as they calculate their wealth except those approved by the first hundred people listed in the Topeka, Kansas telephone book. After they have done that, we will pass legislation to tax the rich at a higher degree. And then remind them that they, under Obama’s scheme will still be counted as among the rich.

Let’s see some real patriotic, caring leadership. Nancy, Harry, you first, show us your sincerity.


16 posted on 11/17/2011 11:34:50 AM PST by Belteshazzar (We are not justified by our works but by faith - De Jacob et vita beata 2 +Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Nancy lies...again.


17 posted on 11/17/2011 11:34:50 AM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Pelosi, liquidate all your and your beard husband wealth. Send check to DOD. Set an example, you hypocrite. Go live in your children’s cellar and collect a Social Security crazy check.


19 posted on 11/17/2011 11:37:01 AM PST by dancusa (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Pelosi on Thursday rejected that plan outright.

Pelosi does not have enough votes to accept or reject anything.

20 posted on 11/17/2011 11:37:27 AM PST by oldbrowser (They are Marxists, don't call them democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

There will be no spending cuts, as a matter of fact, the $300B in taxes the GOP will agree to raise, the Democrats want to spend it on stimulus.

really.


22 posted on 11/17/2011 11:39:52 AM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; ...
I told-ya this is what Panetta was getting at.

What Democrats are saying is that if we want deficit reduction they will give us the following choices :

1) Raise taxes on ‘the rich’
Note that taxes go up after the election is nothing is done.
2) Cut defense

And a third option being no deficit reduction.

Alternatively a passed and signed budget bill in 2013 could replace the trigger cuts, but we are likely to have the same problem then as we did this year: gridlock. Plus at this point we CAN'T count on Republicans doing especially well in the next election.

24 posted on 11/17/2011 11:49:11 AM PST by sickoflibs (Cain :"My parents didn't raise me to beg the government for other peoples money")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

RIGHT!!!!

We need a tax code which SPECIFICALLY addresses millionaire CONGRESSMEN at 75% of their assets. After a few years THAT might flush them out of office as they won;t have anything left to run with - cashwise!!!


25 posted on 11/17/2011 11:49:39 AM PST by ZULU (Anybody but Romney or Huntsman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

There is so much waste in the DOD right now that they could suffer some cuts.

If the GOP walks from the tax cut side and triggers the across-the-board cuts, it would be the smartest thing they could do. It would be the first REAL spending cuts they GOP has accomplished in decades.


26 posted on 11/17/2011 11:51:56 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson