Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; ...
I told-ya this is what Panetta was getting at.

What Democrats are saying is that if we want deficit reduction they will give us the following choices :

1) Raise taxes on ‘the rich’
Note that taxes go up after the election is nothing is done.
2) Cut defense

And a third option being no deficit reduction.

Alternatively a passed and signed budget bill in 2013 could replace the trigger cuts, but we are likely to have the same problem then as we did this year: gridlock. Plus at this point we CAN'T count on Republicans doing especially well in the next election.

24 posted on 11/17/2011 11:49:11 AM PST by sickoflibs (Cain :"My parents didn't raise me to beg the government for other peoples money")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs

RE: “I told-ya this is what Panetta was getting at.” To which I agreed. The goons put Panetta into the position of SoD for a good reason.


42 posted on 11/17/2011 1:22:42 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

IOW, this was the Demwit plan all along — cutting our national defense, which, unlike the money laundering (called ‘stimulus’ by Zero et al), is actually a duty of the federal government according to the Constitution.

Thanks sickoflibs.


44 posted on 11/17/2011 3:59:23 PM PST by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson