Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rabscuttle385

No to Newt for President. He is such a hypocrite. I don’t trust this guy at all. Cain, Bachmann or Santorum. THAT IS IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh boy some will say it is a throw away vote to write in my candidate. Why should I have to vote for someone who does not share my principles. This primary is so wrong. I am sick of having to vote for a mediocre Republican with little to zero ethics and principles. This is like some kind of nightmare. Cain, Bachmann and Santorum are principled candidates who SHOULD be respected and supported especially on this site. I am so disappointed with the FREEPERS who are selling their soul just to ensure a liberal Republican gets the nod. Sad. Absolutely Sad. It is so easy for them too.


5 posted on 11/15/2011 9:13:10 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator

Okay, okay, every single Freeper get’s it. You are as pure as the driven snow, always have been and always will be.... and your not going to vote for Newt.

That’s okay, I’ll vote for him and try to get my first two wives to vote for him too.

He has already addressed this... it’s not news and it’s not an issue.... it was legal.


12 posted on 11/15/2011 9:19:18 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~.. Newt/West 2012.“I’ve got a lot swirling around in my head.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

No argument here. I’m now solidly write-in after the Cain debacle on Libya. Newt or Romney? Not just “no” but ... well you get the picture. I will not abandon my conservative principles and go crawling to the altar of some RINO.


55 posted on 11/15/2011 10:00:06 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Your post looks like it was posted by an out of control, ranting moonbat throwing a temper tantrum.


66 posted on 11/15/2011 10:07:15 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Cain/Bachmann/Santorum......are the only people who can be trusted to carry forward conservative agenda.

Romney’s flip-flops are legion.
Newt’s flip flop and associations with Pelosi, Sharpton, Hillary are well documented record.
Perry is soft on illegals, and his tax proposal will exempt 60% of tax payers from paying any taxes.


73 posted on 11/15/2011 10:24:02 PM PST by federal__reserve (Obama Vs Perry presidential debates are my worst nightmare! Those will get huge audiences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator; rabscuttle385; Impy
Napscoordinator gets it. I wish more freepers did.

I just got done exposing the REAL Rick Perry to freepers (who were fooled into thinking he actually believes in the "tea party" show he puts on every election). But great, now the media has a bunch of gullible conservatives fawning over Newt Gingrich. And as much as I think Perry sucks (just look at my tagline), I rank Newt even lower on my list of Presidential candidates -- and I met the guy face-to-face in Iowa! (after that meeting I can safely say I will never vote for Newt Gingrich for dog catcher... he was BY FAR the most narcissistic and arrogant pol I met that day)

This is gonna be a chore, exposing Newtie to freepers until the latest monthly flavor ends up with fellow frauds Trump and Perry landed. It would be so much easier if conservatives didn't suffer from bouts of amnesia. That scumbag RINO Peter King is legendary for betraying conservatives 546,676,231 times and every time they act like its the first time ever he's gone to bat for the Dems and they're "shocked" he'd behave that way. All the conservative bloggers who vowed mere months ago that they would never ever vote for Newt now have collective amnesia.

At least pretty boy McCain pal John Thune didn't run. A bunch of freepers love that pork barrel spending twit. (which is ironic as they can't stand Lindsey Graham whose voting record is almost identical to Thune's) Thank heaven for small favors. We won't have to worry about him until veep selection time.

82 posted on 11/15/2011 10:37:30 PM PST by BillyBoy (Rick Perry, the governor with a heart... for illegal aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator; federal__reserve; FlipWilson
. >> I just knew that when I got back to my computer and checked FR that there would be at least a dozen “Newt is a RINO” postings. It is funny to me that when anyone other than Romney becomes the frontrunner these posting start to pop up, hmmmm. <<

I don't recall anyone accusing Cain of being a RINO when he surged to the top. I think he's a closet libertarian on some issues and needs more experience and better communication skills, but I don't think any rational conservative would call him a RINO. A couple of Perrybots piled on him during the whole sexual harassment "scandal", probably because A) They wanted revenge for Rick Perry's mediocre record being exposed nationally and B) They figured if Cain was damaged, Perry could somehow get back on top.

As you can see (and as I predicted, just as I predicted that Perry would flop and muddy up the field if he entered the race), the only one that benefited from Cain's fallout is Newt. And that's bad news for me, as I rank Newt even worse than Perry on my list.

I've been very consistent on this from the beginning. I think Bachmann, Santorum, and Cain are the decent conservatives. I haven't endorsed anyone because I don't see any clear conservative choice, but if any of those three get the nomination or are still in the race and winning delegates by the time my state votes, I'll be happy. Perry and Romney are meh. I don't want either of 'em as the nominee. (Roemer is OK but non-existent in the race). Newt, Johnson, Paul, and Huntsman are unacceptable. My opinion on this hasn't changed.

If a candidate that is Meh or Unacceptable rises in the polls gets a bunch of gullible conservatives to believe they are the tea party savior, I'm going to go after that candidate and expose the truth about them until conservatives stop backing them and turn towards one of the decent candidates. Hence I went after Trump and Perry when their fanboys were cheerleading for them on this forum, and it looks like I'll have to go after Newt next if he stays at the top of the polls. If a bunch of conservatives decided Gary Johnson was the reincarnation of Reagan next week, I'd have to go after him too. Any of them would be better than Obama, but I don't want to risk having sucky severely flawed candidates as my party's nominee in November. They stand a good chance of losing to Obama and if they somehow won, they’d be unlikely to undo all the damage he’s caused. That's the bottom line.

No doubt Romney's strategy is to "stay above the fray", while all the "conservative alternates" emerge and fade as they take a beating in the national spotlight. That seems to be working pretty well for Romney at this point but the problem is not conservatives beating up conservative candidates (these candidates will get the hell beaten out of them by the media in the general election so they better learn to survive the scrutiny in the primary). The problem is conservative voters wasting precious time and muddying up the field by creating "buzz" for lousy candidates and touting them as the conservative savior. Guys like Trump, Perry, and Newt are a distraction from the real conservative choices and waste precious time and money when they're getting non-stop coverage as THE great conservative hope.

96 posted on 11/15/2011 11:03:00 PM PST by BillyBoy (Rick Perry, the governor with a heart... for illegal aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
Oh boy some will say it is a throw away vote to write in my candidate. Why should I have to vote for someone who does not share my principles

Very nice thinking and just the type of independence that was shown towards McCain in the last presidential election. Such great thinking gave us OBAMA.

We do not need just independents, but citizens who care who will have the finger on the supreme court appointment button. Such selfish thinking will not just result in Obama, but an Obama with 2 maybe 3 SCOTUS appointments during his term as president.

Is that really what you want for your family and relatives?. Is that what you want for your country? Sorry, but how selfish. Especially when you look at who he appointed his first term!
102 posted on 11/15/2011 11:18:07 PM PST by JSteff ((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Those are my three too. Santorum is my personal favorite. I like Bachmann and Cain next. Unfortunately, it’s basically over by the time our primary occurs here.


117 posted on 11/16/2011 12:50:49 AM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson