Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court has agreed to hear legal challenges to Obama health care law
MSNBC ^ | Nov 14, 2011

Posted on 11/14/2011 7:15:57 AM PST by Second Amendment First

Headline only

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhohealthcare; healthcare; obamacare; scotus; socialisthealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2011 7:15:58 AM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Thank God. Now do the right thing.


2 posted on 11/14/2011 7:18:44 AM PST by NowApproachingMidnight (“Civilizations die from suicide, not murder.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

3 posted on 11/14/2011 7:18:58 AM PST by TSgt (whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive...it is the Right of the People to abolish it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Supreme Court will hear legal fight over health care overhaul; arguments likely in late March

http://www.nwcn.com/news/national/133804248.html


4 posted on 11/14/2011 7:19:55 AM PST by Second Amendment First ("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First



OBAMACARE ON THE DOCKET

5 posted on 11/14/2011 7:20:11 AM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

IT IS ABOUT TIME!!!!!!


6 posted on 11/14/2011 7:20:49 AM PST by Dem Guard (Obama's 57 States = The Organization of The Islamic Conference (OIC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Should be a slam dunk NO.. it's unconstitutional.
7 posted on 11/14/2011 7:20:53 AM PST by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I hope they broadcast the audio like they did the Second Amendment arguments.


8 posted on 11/14/2011 7:21:14 AM PST by TSgt (whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive...it is the Right of the People to abolish it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FReepers

FReepathon Day 45 ... Please Contribute!

9 posted on 11/14/2011 7:21:31 AM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Thanks onyx: That means arguments could come in March, allowing plenty of time for a decision in late June, just over four months before Election Day.
10 posted on 11/14/2011 7:23:10 AM PST by Second Amendment First ("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

WOO-HOO!


11 posted on 11/14/2011 7:28:43 AM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

I agree with your judgement from a legal point of view, but “Should be” and “gonna happen anyway” sometimes seem to be on different planets, when viewed from inside the Beltway.


12 posted on 11/14/2011 7:31:28 AM PST by Pecos (O.K., joke's over. Time to bring back the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I hope this doesn’t mean they were waiting on that decision from the DC Circuit. I think the solution will lie not within the Supreme Court but rather in the 2012 election and subsequent repeal. And it is time to reign in the Commerce Clause with a limiting amendment.


13 posted on 11/14/2011 7:34:23 AM PST by NonValueAdded (At 4 AM, it is a test; at 2 PM, it is a demonstration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

According to Judge Napolitano on Fox Business just now, the SCOTUS DID NOT AGREE TO HEAR THE OBAMACARE CASE! But rather it has agreed to hear whether or not those bringing the case “HAVE THE STANDING TO DO SO!”
Personally, I think we need to impeach all of these a$$holes! The country is burning and they continue to fiddle! They are a total disgrace to this nation, every last one of them. They all need to be replaced.


14 posted on 11/14/2011 7:35:01 AM PST by vette6387 (Enough Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Mark Levin had comments on the DC appeals court decision last week and how the Reagan-appointed judge agreed with the Rat-appointed judge that the law is constitutional. He said his Landmark Legal Foundation would be filing a brief detailing where the judge got it wrong.

Here is Mark's link to an explanation from the Washington Examiner:
D.C. federal appeals court upholds Obamacare; no impact on SCOTUS case

15 posted on 11/14/2011 7:37:47 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

If the SC rules in favor of obama, it hands him the election. Of course, I’m about 90% convinced it’s all rigged anyway.

And by the way, I don’t hold out much hope with the SC. We the people allowed this all to go too far decades ago when we fell in love with our congressman for bringing home the pork.


16 posted on 11/14/2011 7:43:28 AM PST by Terry Mross (We need an opposition party. I will only vote for a second party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vette6387
"According to Judge Napolitano on Fox Business just now, the SCOTUS DID NOT AGREE TO HEAR THE OBAMACARE CASE! But rather it has agreed to hear whether or not those bringing the case “HAVE THE STANDING TO DO SO!”

This is a really important point. If they rule against standing, then the whole process would have to start over and drag out for more years. Much like the many rulings against Obama's NBC status, this would be a strategy to not rule on the issue.

17 posted on 11/14/2011 7:48:44 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

They need to issue an injunction right now. Damage is being done - right now.


18 posted on 11/14/2011 7:49:59 AM PST by apastron (I miss the good old days - when bankers just jumped out of a window...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Fox News has the ugliest lesbian on TV right now can I sue for emotional distress?


19 posted on 11/14/2011 7:56:33 AM PST by Dengar01 (Dengar01 - "Heartless" since 1983!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

This is incorrect. SCOTUS will decide the constitutionality of the law.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/11/court-sets-5-12-hour-hearing-on-health-care/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+scotusblog%2FpFXs+%28SCOTUSblog%29

This is easily the best website for all things supreme.


20 posted on 11/14/2011 7:57:04 AM PST by Founding Father (The Pedophile moHAMmudd (PBUH---Pigblood be upon him))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson