Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Not Santorum?
National Review Online ^ | November 9, 2011 | Quin Hillyer

Posted on 11/11/2011 5:08:27 PM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands

Mike Pence, Mitch Daniels, Paul Ryan, Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio, Chris Christie, Jeb Bush — conservatives all year long have been wishing, yearning, even begging people who aren’t in the presidential race to enter the fray and save them from what seems like a frighteningly uninspiring field of candidates. Yet could it be that the sharpest, most accomplished, most campaign-savvy, and most full-spectrum conservative in a quarter-century of presidential contests has been in the contest all along, working harder than anybody, making at least as much intellectual sense as anybody, never blowing a debate, and never failing to stand on principle?

The man of the hour could be that perennial underdog, Rick Santorum.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: bobbyjindal; chrischristie; conservative; jebbush; marcorubio; mikepence; mitchdaniels; paulryan; pennsylvania; prolifer; ricksantorum; santorum; ultraconservative
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Java4Jay

“I wanted Mike Pence”

I actually wanted Mike Pence, too. (Well, at least after some more unelectable choices, like Tom Coburn, for example.) But Rick Santorum is my first choice among the current group. I would settle for a good conservative. I would be content with Cain or Bachmann, and maybe with Perry. (But I would give one of my teeth for a Tom Coburn/Jim DeMint administration.)


21 posted on 11/11/2011 5:26:28 PM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Who? Oh, him. NO!


22 posted on 11/11/2011 5:27:17 PM PST by WellyP (REAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

“Really? So voting for Medicare Part D was being a “doctrinaire Conservative”?”

You certainly didn’t mind when the GOP controlled Congress passed the bill and Dubya signed the measure now did you.


23 posted on 11/11/2011 5:27:17 PM PST by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

I think you said it better. “Why not Santorum? Because he’s a snarky sanctimonious corrupt pissant, and a proven loser. Thats why.”


24 posted on 11/11/2011 5:29:07 PM PST by WellyP (REAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands
Why Not Santorum?

Because he's charisma-challenged and a tad too sanctimonious.

I actually liked him ... until I saw his debate performances.

25 posted on 11/11/2011 5:29:13 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Seems to me that there are an awful lot of part time FReepers who show up for campaigns and pimp their RINOs.

You and I spot these things because we don’t have lives. LOL


26 posted on 11/11/2011 5:30:56 PM PST by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a permanent Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Two terms and then he loses by 20 points in his home State. LOSER!


27 posted on 11/11/2011 5:31:49 PM PST by WellyP (REAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Clever but utterly irrelevant.

I'm not the one bragging about being the flawless perfect Conservative Presidential candidate like Santroum

28 posted on 11/11/2011 5:31:56 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Do not underestimate the Mormon machine! They are pros at PR and image making. Mitt hides behind an expensive paper mask! Newt has been a flip flopper forever (catch a few vudeis at today’s thedougurbanskishow.com), and though smart, the smartest among us often have the least common sense. He has proven to be a loose canon in the past.

So let us hope the voting public is not fickle. The leading candidate is Herman Cain, our last chance to reclaim our Constitutional Republic! Mr. Cain is the real deal!


29 posted on 11/11/2011 5:32:27 PM PST by Paperdoll (I like Herman Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke

Since you want to get into history, how did your relentless pimping McCain in 2008 work out for you?


30 posted on 11/11/2011 5:33:35 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, the second to the bottom is I, I, I, I, I, I, I Bachmann and the third is I, I, I, I, I Gingrich....

We already have an I Narcissist in the WH personally don't want another.

31 posted on 11/11/2011 5:35:36 PM PST by not2worry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

And he did endorse Arlen Specter - one I he must have forgotten about!


32 posted on 11/11/2011 5:37:15 PM PST by not2worry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Yes, yes, but of course: a defeated US Senator (of all political offices) now running for our nation’s highest.

Right on! Go, Rick Go!


33 posted on 11/11/2011 5:37:29 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Actually its quite pertinent. Santorum at least had the decency to admit that he was wrong on supporting Medicare Part D:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/24/santorum-admits-medicare-mistake/

You on the other hand had a whale of a time defending Dubya and all the other assorted big govt nonsense that he and the GOP put forth. Its pretty cute that NOW you’re all about purity. Must piss you off that you can’t make your cheerleading posts disappear down the rabbit hole huh?


34 posted on 11/11/2011 5:38:02 PM PST by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Santorum supports ethanol subsidies (this will stop Global Warming) and funding Amtrak projects. He prefers Arlen Specter to Pat Toomey and has supported community block development programs. He has triangulated his position on abortion (in 1990). He is a fraud. He has repeatedly voted to push the country into debt. Thank you, no more RINOs.


35 posted on 11/11/2011 5:39:20 PM PST by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

36 posted on 11/11/2011 5:39:36 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

and a football coach!


37 posted on 11/11/2011 5:40:32 PM PST by RetiredArmy (We Christians should look at this world as being a filthy restroom at a roadside gas station.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

“So let us hope the voting public is not fickle. The leading candidate is Herman Cain, our last chance to reclaim our Constitutional Republic! Mr. Cain is the real deal!”

Amen. Newt is a great debater, and I would certainly nominate him for president of the Debate Society. But as a candidate that can get the Grass Roots out (aka, the Tea Party), I’m not so sure. I still remember 1996. People never really trusted Bob Dole, even though he came through against Clinton during those first two scary years. Dole simply had too much history.

No matter what anyone tells me, I will NEVER forgive Newt for sitting on the couch with Pelosi. He had time to think about it...probably weeks, yet he still chose to do it - that says something about what he might do as president. Even though I HATE my governor (Perry), I’m still less bothered by his debates than by Newt’s stunt. In Perry’s case, he needed to memorize stuff (which he’s not good at, as shown by his college grades) and then think quick. Newt had PLENTY OF TIME to think over this Pelosi stunt and it’s long-term implications...yet he STILL chose to do it. Not good, not good at all.


38 posted on 11/11/2011 5:42:24 PM PST by BobL (Send Rove a Message, VOTE CAIN, no matter what)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Senator’s DeMint and Dr. Coburn are exceptional and both have been in private business. I think both men would make excellent presidents, but neither are running.

Former US Senator Santorum is running as a defeated senator and that doesn’t bode well for his chances.


39 posted on 11/11/2011 5:43:59 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

I am so fresh out of vomit.


40 posted on 11/11/2011 5:49:12 PM PST by gatorhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson