Posted on 11/09/2011 8:39:51 AM PST by Brookhaven
Edited on 11/09/2011 9:02:30 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Donna Donella, 40, of Arlington, said the USAID paid Cain to deliver a speech to businessmen and women in Egypt in 2002, during which an Egyptian businesswoman in her 30s asked Cain a question.
"And after the seminar was over," Donella told The Washington Examiner, "Cain came over to me and a colleague and said, 'Could you put me in touch with that lovely young lady who asked the question, so I can give her a more thorough answer over dinner?'"
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
The AP is also falsely claiming a 5th woman has accused Cain of sexual harassment.
Being “suspicious of Cain’s motives” in why he wanted to set up a dinner is now harassment?
Joel Bennett slipped up and referred to #2 as "Sharon from Chicago" at some point. When asked, Bialek wouldn't deny contacting Bennett, and her attorney Allred quickly changed the subject.
Well there you go. She's a 2/5ths accuser...
Having dinner I think would be normal for people in the RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION. It doesn’t necessarily mean he was trying to seduce her.
Is Perry still behind all this?
By Jove, I think he's got it!
I had figured that out also, I was going to write a follow up tomorrow “There is No 4th Cain Accusor”.
It seems there are only 3, and at least two of them seem to be bogus.
So let me get this straight, inviting someone to dinner is harassment, but exposing your malformed genitalia to a subordinate is not?
I don’t understand your reference.
bttt
This thing has smelled so coordinated, like it was all ran thru lawyers and strategists to spread the sleeze but not be able to really refute it. At the core there is no ‘there there’. It’s all shadow games.
Two of them won’t give their names or say what he did, one works for the Zero administration and also won’t say what he did, but claims she might and possibly in a joint presser with the other two. Tease and hint, but no presser forthcoming as of yet.
The fourth told the story in such a way as to make sure no one else could possibly confirm or deny. Fortunately she is completely uncredible and it still fell apart.
It’s all too scripted. I think they were hoping it would take off like wildfire and Cain be done before it was refuted.
Welcome to the Internet Age stupid MSM.
Did any of you hear that Obama hack talking to Jenna Lee about Iran a few minutes ago?
He sounds like Elmer Fudd?
He said Iran kind of has a Cain problem, stuff in their past...blah, blah... that takes away credibility...blah
No one on FOX ever stops a person like that and says, why did you bring Cain into this discussion, rather odd..
They are mounting an all out attack on Cain today.
I think they are referring to when Bill Clinton exposed himself to Paula Jones.
Does that matter to the MSM? Of course not. Their only desire is to continue the slow, steady drip of stories with suggestions based on someone's feelings or suppostions, none of which have any evidence behind them. They don't ask questions of any of the accusers, they simply report what they're told. Their intention isn't to completely destroy Herman Cain. They only want to bleed off enough supporters to affect a reduction in his standing in the race for the Republican nomination.
His standing in the polls will only be reduced if folks who had initially supported him fall for the breathless reportage of the MSM, and take these stories at face value without ANY evidence to support them.
This confirms there are only THREE complainants:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2011-11-08/herman-cain-accusers/51129758/1
Bialek - NRA Chicago employee fired - claim of meeting HC in Washington DC. Atty Gloria Allred
Kraushaar - NRA employee severance payment - employed by INS - now with Treasury Dept. Atty Joel Bennett
Anonymous - NRA employee severance payment - no more details.
Clinton is known to be malformed.
There are only TWO accusers...TWO!
any reference to more than TWO is PURE UNPROVEN RUMOR AT THIS MOMENT!
So, there are really three, two of whom we have names for, and both of whom have a history of claiming harassment and/or filing complaints.
There’s no there there.
stuck them with the bill for 2 - 400$ bottles of wine? Ummmmhummmmm.... yeah right. PROVE IT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.