[bullypulpit]

It’s sourced here:

http://rickperryreport.com/article/2011-11-01/herman-cain-reckless-and-arrogant

[buccaneer81]

[Pelham]

So you’re citing a Rick Perry webpage that you yourself developed as the source?

Maybe that would work if you actually had some quotes and links to the National Journal that back up your claim that

“I read an article in the National Journal that said the NRA couldn’t get rid of Cain’s womanizing ass soon enough.”

but you don’t. I suppose if you actually had that information you would have linked to it here instead of driving traffic to your Rick Perry Report.

[FredZarguna]

Some of his peers privately said that they were astonished at how he was being portrayed. They said that his less than three-year tenure (rather brief in the Washington trade-association world) was rocky and that the restaurant folks couldn’t get rid of him soon enough—possibly because of sexual-harassment allegations.

Again, an anonymous source privately says something nasty about a former co-worker, and you think this is dispositive? Really? No wonder you think the Politico story was "adequately sourced." This is nothing more than rumor, and more to the point: IT DOES NOT SUPPORT THE CLAIM YOU MADE.

You've turned an unsourced, anonymous, off the record quote, accompanied by an editorial conjecture on the part of the journalist (or editorialist, it's hard to tell which) into a factual statement that the NRA wanted to be rid of Cain for sexual harassment.

Someone here is indeed "reckless and arrogant," and I'll let FReepers judge for themselves who that is based on the thinness of your actual facts and your shameless blog-pimping.

[rintense]

BLOG PIMP!!!