Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican stunned by Irish embassy closure
Reuters ^ | November 4, 2011 | Philip Pullella

Posted on 11/04/2011 7:02:26 AM PDT by decimon

Catholic Ireland's stunning decision to close its embassy to the Vatican is a huge blow to the Holy See's prestige and may be followed by other countries which feel the missions are too expensive, diplomatic sources said on Friday.

The closure brought relations between Ireland and the Vatican, once ironclad allies, to an all-time low following the row earlier this year over the Irish Church's handling of sex abuse cases and accusations that the Vatican had encouraged secrecy.

Ireland will now be the only major country of ancient Catholic tradition without an embassy in the Vatican.

"This is really bad for the Vatican because Ireland is the first big Catholic country to do this and because of what Catholicism means in Irish history," said a Vatican diplomatic source who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholic; diplomacy; ireland; romancatholicism; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: MrEdd

Ah, jumping to conclusions again — read the article: it’s about a socialist government trying to divert attention from itself. Now, the “bash-em Caflix” are joining with the socialists and communists — congratulations!


21 posted on 11/04/2011 7:50:02 AM PDT by Cronos (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2787101/posts?page=58#58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Sorry, but you are grossly misinformed.

Their budgets aren’t done for tax purposes, etc etc..

The vatican sits on wealth of generations in terms of its real estate and artifacts, but its budget is hardly large considering the scope and scale of the Church’s works.

I know it won’t stop the catholic bashing that is prevalent here, but facts never matter to the bigot.


22 posted on 11/04/2011 7:50:03 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Let’s not get all semantic, ‘K? Cut the crap. The wealth under the direct control of the catholics is in the hundreds of billions, if not low trillions.


23 posted on 11/04/2011 7:51:16 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick; Romulus
Tick -- just google the budget and you'll see that your statement You and I both know how much wealth is stored up in the catholic church though. To pretend otherwise is highly disingenuous. is incorrect -- firstly the budget is about $200 million odd IIRC. Secondly -- if you are talking about the "wealth" being the art stored there, then that is art that would not be sold but is there for people to visit and see -- would one have the sistine chapel cut into bits and sold?
24 posted on 11/04/2011 7:52:06 AM PDT by Cronos (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2787101/posts?page=58#58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile
Researches have access to the “super-duper secret vault”. All a person needs is to present your academic credentials (Or pursuits in case you are still in higher education) and scholarly thesis for review, then your “in”.
25 posted on 11/04/2011 7:53:20 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick; Romulus; A.A. Cunningham
Tick -- just google the budget and you'll see that your statement You and I both know how much wealth is stored up in the catholic church though. To pretend otherwise is highly disingenuous. is incorrect -- firstly the budget is about $200 million odd IIRC. Secondly -- if you are talking about the "wealth" being the art stored there, then that is art that would not be sold but is there for people to visit and see -- would one have the sistine chapel cut into bits and sold?

Then Tick says The wealth under the direct control of the catholics is in the hundreds of billions, if not low trillions. -- oh, so now you mean all Catholics? First you said the Vatican, then the Catholic Church and now all Catholics -- is that what you mean?

26 posted on 11/04/2011 7:53:40 AM PDT by Cronos (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2787101/posts?page=58#58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

>> facts never matter to the bigot

I’m not a bigot. “Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.” The only thing I’ll say from a Christian perspective is catholics do *not* have a lock on eternal salvation like they think they do. Otherwise, your eternal reward is not for me to judge.

But the Vatican crying “poor us” is laughable. If you consider pointing that out to be bigotry, then I’ll have to call you a naive partisan in reply.


27 posted on 11/04/2011 7:54:38 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

What credentials would such a scholar have?
A recommendation from their local bishop?


28 posted on 11/04/2011 7:54:56 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Convince me that the vatican doesn’t have access to as much of that catholic wealth as they might ever need.


29 posted on 11/04/2011 7:55:48 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
You don't know jack.

The "Holy See's Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year 2010" reports a total income of 245.2 million Euros and total costs of 235.3 million, resulting in a surplus of almost 10 million Euros. This is a positive result, especially compared to the previous two budgets: in 2009, with a loss of 4.1 million and in 2008, with a loss of 911 thousand Euros.

30 posted on 11/04/2011 7:56:36 AM PDT by Romulus (The Traditional Latin Mass is the real Youth Mass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

>> You don’t know jack.

And you may have fooled yourself, but you aren’t fooling me.


31 posted on 11/04/2011 7:59:22 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

Academic or journalistic credentials — the kind you get from being a scholar at a real institution of higher learning, or a journalist affiliated with any organization anyone’s ever heard of. You don’t need a letter from your bishop any more than you’d need it at the Library of Congress. Do I need to add that you don’t need to be Catholic, Christian, or anything at all? It’s a scholarly institution, friend. Try to understand what that means.

I know know you want to make Secret Archives out to be a private club where inside-connected Catholics get to snoop through the juicy files — for a friendly contribution, of course. You need to get over this ignorant bigotry.


32 posted on 11/04/2011 8:03:22 AM PDT by Romulus (The Traditional Latin Mass is the real Youth Mass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Put up or shut up.


33 posted on 11/04/2011 8:04:06 AM PDT by Romulus (The Traditional Latin Mass is the real Youth Mass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

You are correct. A majority of the Church’s material wealth is the priceless art and artifacts in their possession. The Church is going cash broke just like the rest of us..


34 posted on 11/04/2011 8:04:53 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Pujols/Freese 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

I did. Read for meaning.


35 posted on 11/04/2011 8:07:31 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

I think to burden of proof is on you, as one can not prove a negative. Were the Church, or Pope for that matter, to have access to untold wealth, what have they done with it? Or, what would they do with it?


36 posted on 11/04/2011 8:08:50 AM PDT by SpirituTuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

You know something? The US government has uncounted wealth also. They could sell all that useless junk the Smithsonian is warehousing. The site of the Washington Monument (already damaged) has plenty of space for some nice office buildings (do you know how high class A rents are in the District?). And don’t you think Arlington cemetery could be redeveloped into some first class luxury apartments, retail, and destination restaurants? Tick, your insights have so much potential!


37 posted on 11/04/2011 8:16:06 AM PDT by Romulus (The Traditional Latin Mass is the real Youth Mass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick; Campion; Romulus
Simply put, they don't. Reasons range from the fact that no country is going to allow national treasures like art to be sold out of the country to the plain fact that unfortunately each country's diocese runs itself -- which is why the German one, for example, can regularly defy the Vatican on non-doctrinal issues (as did the Irish).

Your posts was saying that the trillion$$ owned by Catholics across the world like me (ok, I don't have trillions ;-P) would fork over all of that to the Vatican city state for any cause -- and your post is wrong.

I do give some (not enough) to Catholic charities and missions, but no, it doesn't go through the Vatican.

The Vatican doesn't have "access to as much of that wealth as they may ever need", not even wrt to individual dioceses who would baulk at giving all of it to the Vatican as they use it for charities etc.

38 posted on 11/04/2011 8:16:55 AM PDT by Cronos (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2787101/posts?page=58#58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

If I’d known where this thread would go then I wouldn’t have started it


39 posted on 11/04/2011 8:20:10 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SpirituTuo; Nervous Tick
"Untold riches," eh Nervous Tick?

What next, the Whore of Babylon? We're heard it before, so cough it up and show your true colors.

Michelangelo's paintings in the Sistine Chapel, not to mention Bernini's baldacchino in Saint Peter's and other extremely valuable art owned by the Vatican, are not for sale. This artwork will remain for the greater glory of God, and they are available for viewing by every humble man or woman who wishes to view them.

Isn't it tiresome how the Catholic Bashers crawl out every time there is a newsworthy article posted on FR about the Vatican?

40 posted on 11/04/2011 8:21:10 AM PDT by d-back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson